한국어에 나타나는 ‘진실’ 표현 어휘의 담화표지 기능 연구
A Corpus-based Study of the Truth-related Words in Korean Used as Discourse Markers
5
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates how the truth-related words in Korean, which were originally noun or adverb with ‘truth’ related meaning, can be used as discourse markers with the functions such as ‘emphatic marker’, ‘attention getter’, or ‘hesitation marker’, and it argues that such functions of the discourse markers are the result of grammaticalization process. That is to say that the truth-related words have acquired new functions as discourse markers from their corresponding lexical items as a noun or an adverb through grammaticalization process. In this study, we demonstrate that the truth-related words tend to appear sentence-initially or sentence-medially when they are used as discourse markers. We also show that they are most likely to be used as emphatic marker because of the lexical meaning of the truth-related words. Finally, we state that truth-related words differ from one another in where they appear and what function they are used with.
Abstract
This study investigates how the truth-related words in Korean, which were originally noun or adverb with ‘truth’ related meaning, can be used as discourse markers with the functions such as ‘emphatic marker’, ‘attention getter’, or ‘hesitation marker’, and it argues that such functions of the discourse markers are the result of grammaticalization process. That is to say that the truth-related words have acquired new functions as discourse markers from their corresponding lexical items as a noun or an adverb through grammaticalization process. In this study, we demonstrate that the truth-related words tend to appear sentence-initially or sentence-medially when they are used as discourse markers. We also show that they are most likely to be used as emphatic marker because of the lexical meaning of the truth-related words. Finally, we state that truth-related words differ from one another in where they appear and what function they are used with.
참고문헌 (15)
- 강우원, "담화표지 ‘참’과 어찌말 ‘참’의 비교연구", 언어과학, 1, pp.5~26 (2000)
- 김영철, "우리말 담화표지 참 고찰", 국어문학, 43(1), pp.235~254 (2007), 국어문학회
- 김향화, "한국어 담화표지의 기능", 한국학논집, 28, pp.113~140 (2004), 계명대학교 한국학연구소
- 이한규, "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘그래’의 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 3, pp.1~26 (1996)
- 임규홍, "국어 담화 표지 ‘인자’에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 2, pp.1~20 (1996)
- 임규홍, "부사 ‘정말’류의 담화적 의미", 한국어 의미학, 2, pp.237~254 (1998)
- 전영옥, "한국어 담화표지의 특징 연구" (2002), 역락
- Grice, H. Paul, "Logic and conversation, In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Hopper, Paul J., "Traugott. Grammaticalization, 2nd edition" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 김태호, "Negation in Korean: its grammaticalization and lexicalization process", 언어연구, 24(4), pp.685~705 (2009), 한국현대언어학회
- Mey, Jacob L., "Pragmatics: An introduction" (1994), Blackwell
- Schiffrin, Deborah, "Discourse Markers" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998), 두산동아
- 21세기 세종 계획, "국립국어원", ~
- "꼬꼬마 세종말뭉치", 서울대학교[URL]