Tactical Changes of the Chosŏn Military in the First Year of the East Asian War
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For the first three months of the East Asian War, Chosŏn commanders learned how fleetly the Japanese armies, equipped with keen swords for close combat and dreadful muskets for long-range shooting, marched due to their adroit maneuvers. This article examines the way the Chosŏn armies made tactical adjustments during the East Asian War, especially from the third quarter of 1592 to the first quarter of 1593, while at the same time avoiding a direct confrontation with the Japanese armies. One focus of this paper is upon how the Chosŏn armies opted for defensive fortifications, depended on infantry-centered operations, and achieved some meaningful victories. The other focus is upon how the tactical changes had a bearing on Sino-Korean military collaboration and the resumption of Sino-Japanese negotiations. This two-tiered approach will place Chosŏn perspectives in line with recent research on the interstate scale of the war, where infantry warfare and firearms became one major strategy of Chosŏn and Ming against “the northern caitiffs (the Mongols/Jurchens) and the southern dwarves (Japan) 北虜南倭” in the sixteenth century and beyond, and illuminate the complex interstate relations among the East Asian countries that couched Ming-centered regional hegemony in terms of their own security
Abstract
For the first three months of the East Asian War, Chosŏn commanders learned how fleetly the Japanese armies, equipped with keen swords for close combat and dreadful muskets for long-range shooting, marched due to their adroit maneuvers. This article examines the way the Chosŏn armies made tactical adjustments during the East Asian War, especially from the third quarter of 1592 to the first quarter of 1593, while at the same time avoiding a direct confrontation with the Japanese armies. One focus of this paper is upon how the Chosŏn armies opted for defensive fortifications, depended on infantry-centered operations, and achieved some meaningful victories. The other focus is upon how the tactical changes had a bearing on Sino-Korean military collaboration and the resumption of Sino-Japanese negotiations. This two-tiered approach will place Chosŏn perspectives in line with recent research on the interstate scale of the war, where infantry warfare and firearms became one major strategy of Chosŏn and Ming against “the northern caitiffs (the Mongols/Jurchens) and the southern dwarves (Japan) 北虜南倭” in the sixteenth century and beyond, and illuminate the complex interstate relations among the East Asian countries that couched Ming-centered regional hegemony in terms of their own security
참고문헌 (38)
- [URL]
- (2002), Asea Munhwasa
- ". In Han’guk munjip ch’onggan 韓國文集叢刊, vol. 72", Han’guk Kojŏn Pŏnyŏgwŏn
- [URL]
- [URL]
- Andrade, Tonio, "A Korean Military Revolution? : Parallel Military Innovations in East Asia and Europe", Journal of World History, 25(1), pp.51~84 (2014)
- Chan, Hok-Lam, "The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part I", pp.182~304 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Chase, Kenneth, "Firearms : A Global History to 1700" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Haboush, JaHyun Kim, "The Great East Asian War and the Birth of the Korean Nation" (2016), Columbia University Press
- 하태규, "진주성전투에 있어서 경상우도관찰사 김성일의 역할", 南冥學硏究, (57), pp.125~158 (2018), 경남문화연구원[DOI]
- Han Myŏnggi(Myung-gi Han)한명기, (1999), Yŏksa Pip’yŏngsa
- 한명기, "임진왜란 직전 동아시아 정세", 한일관계사연구, (43), pp.175~214 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 한명기, "A Study of Research Trends in Korea on the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592(Imjin War)", International Journal of Korean History, 18(2), pp.1~29 (2013), 한국사연구소
- Hasegawa, Masato, "War, Supply Lines, and Society in the Sino-Korean Borderland of the Late Sixteenth Century", Late Imperial China, 37(1), pp.109~152 (2016)
- 허남린, "Works in English on the Imjin War and the Challenge of Research", International Journal of Korean History, 18(2), pp.53~80 (2013), 한국사연구소
- 김경태, "임진전쟁 전반기, 가토 기요마사(加藤淸正)의 동향 - 戰功의 위기와 講和交涉으로의 가능성", 대동문화연구, (77), pp.223~268 (2012), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 김경태, "임진전쟁기 이정암의 활동과 연안성 전투 - 피난민, 전쟁 영웅, ‘주화론자’ 사이에서 -", 한국인물사연구, (24), pp.180~215 (2015), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 김경태, "임진전쟁 초기 이광의 활동과 용인전투에 대한 재고", 史叢(사총), (89), pp.01~32 (2016), 역사연구소[DOI]
- 김문자, "임진왜란기의 강화교섭과 加藤淸正 -조선왕자의 送還문제를 중심으로-", 한일관계사연구, (42), pp.383~416 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 김평원, "행주산성 전투에 사용된 변이중 화차의 복원", 한국과학사학회지, 33(3), pp.83~114 (2011), 한국과학사학회
- Kitajima, Manji, "The East Asian War, 1592-1598: International Relations, Violence, and Memory", pp.73~92 (2015), Routledge
- Lewis, James, "The East Asian War, 1592-1598: International Relations, Violence, and Memory", pp.256~273 (2015), Routledge
- Lorge, Peter A, "The Asian Military Revolution : From Gunpowder to the Bomb" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Nukii, Masayuki, "The East Asian War, 1592- 1598: International Relations, Violence, and Memory", pp.141~162 (2015), Routledge
- Oh, Ki-seung, "Clashes between Liaodong Koreans and the Goryeo Royal House in the 13th to 14th Centuries", The Journal of Northeast Asian History, 16(2), pp.7~34 (2020)
- Rossabi, Morris, "The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part I", pp.221~271 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Sajima, Akiko, "The East Asian War, 1592-1598: International Relations, Violence, and Memory", pp.93~107 (2015), Routledge
- 심승구, "임진왜란 중 독산성 전투와 그 역사적 의의- 전술적․전략적 가치를 중심으로 -", 한국학논총, 37, pp.121~154 (2012), 한국학연구소
- Swope, Kenneth M, "A Dragon’s Head and a Serpent’s Tail : Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, 1592-1598" (2009), University of Oklahoma Press
- 이정일, "15세기 후반 조선의 서북면 방어와 명의 遼東 진출", 역사와 담론, (87), pp.115~158 (2018), 호서사학회
- 이정일, "임진왜란 초기 조명 군사 협력의 양상 －벽제관 전투 전후를 중심으로－", 韓國史學報, (75), pp.85~114 (2019), 고려사학회[DOI]
- 이정일, "임진왜란 전반기 조명 군사 협력의 일단 - 함경도 일본군 퇴각과 관련하여－", 한일관계사연구, (66), pp.129~166 (2019), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
- 이정일, "임진왜란 전반기 조선의 남병(南兵) 인식과 활용 방안", 한국사연구, (189), pp.79~110 (2020), 한국사연구회[DOI]
- 이계황, "임진왜란과 강화교섭 - 쓰시마번과 고니시 유키나가를 중심으로", 동북아 문화연구, 1(34), pp.85~110 (2013), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 이상훈, "신립의 작전지역 선정과 탄금대 전투", 군사, (87), pp.275~302 (2013), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 유연성, "임진왜란기 한성 주변 전투의 전략적 의의", 한일관계사연구, (48), pp.93~130 (2014), 한일관계사학회