New Trends in Commentary on the Confucian Classics: Characteristics, Differences, and Significance of Rhetorically Oriented Exegeses of the Mengzi
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Originally, East Asian intellectuals focused their attention on the philosophy of the Confucian Classics, rarely commenting on their literary aspects. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, however, there were three exegetical works that proposed a different approach to the Mengzi: Maengja ch’aŭi (Notes on the meanings of the Mengzi) written by Wi Paekkyu (1727–1798), a Chosŏn scholar, Mengzi lunwen written by Niu Yunzhen (1706–1758) from China, and Doku Mōshi written by Hirose Tansō (1782–1856) in Japan. These exegeses approached the Mengzi through its literary style, and commented on many literary points: rhetorical strategy, grammar, and wording. In this article, these exegetical works are referred to as “rhetorical commentaries” since they emphasized rhetoric to a much greater extent than previous commentaries. The purpose of this article is to show how the rhetorical commentaries are different from ordinary or standard commentaries, such as the works of Zhu Xi and Jiao Xun, but also to point out some differences among the three rhetorical commentaries. In addition, this study evaluates the significance of the appearance in East Asia of rhetorical commentaries in the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. This will be done by placing them in the context of elevant historical events and changes in literati culture from the middle ages to the early-modern period of East Asia. Thus, this article will be a first step towards an understanding of rhetorically oriented exegeses in East Asia and the relationship between these commentaries, their historical change and their intellectual history.
Abstract
Originally, East Asian intellectuals focused their attention on the philosophy of the Confucian Classics, rarely commenting on their literary aspects. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, however, there were three exegetical works that proposed a different approach to the Mengzi: Maengja ch’aŭi (Notes on the meanings of the Mengzi) written by Wi Paekkyu (1727–1798), a Chosŏn scholar, Mengzi lunwen written by Niu Yunzhen (1706–1758) from China, and Doku Mōshi written by Hirose Tansō (1782–1856) in Japan. These exegeses approached the Mengzi through its literary style, and commented on many literary points: rhetorical strategy, grammar, and wording. In this article, these exegetical works are referred to as “rhetorical commentaries” since they emphasized rhetoric to a much greater extent than previous commentaries. The purpose of this article is to show how the rhetorical commentaries are different from ordinary or standard commentaries, such as the works of Zhu Xi and Jiao Xun, but also to point out some differences among the three rhetorical commentaries. In addition, this study evaluates the significance of the appearance in East Asia of rhetorical commentaries in the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. This will be done by placing them in the context of elevant historical events and changes in literati culture from the middle ages to the early-modern period of East Asia. Thus, this article will be a first step towards an understanding of rhetorically oriented exegeses in East Asia and the relationship between these commentaries, their historical change and their intellectual history.
참고문헌 (56)
- Hirose Tansō, "Hirose zenshū (Completed works of Hirose)" (1927), Hitagun kyōikukai
- Hong Sŏkchu, "Yŏnch’ŏn chŏnsŏ (Completed works of Yŏnch’ŏn)" (1984), Osŏngsa
- Jiao Xun, "Mengzi zhengyi (Correct meaning of the Mengzi), Vols. 1–2" (1996), Zhonghua shuju
- Kim Ch’anghyŏp, "Han’guk munjip ch’onggan (Comprehensive publication of Sino-Korean literary collections in Sino-Korean), Vol. 162" (1996), Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe
- ")"
- Legge, James, "The Chinese Classics, Vol. 2" (1960), Hong Kong University Press
- Legge, James, "The I Ching" (2015), Dover Publications
- Li Zhi, "Sishu ping (Evaluating the Four Books)" (1995), Shanghai guji chubanshe
- Niu Yunzhen, "Mengzi lunwen (A literary analysis of the Mengzi)", Kongsantang wenji (Collected works of Kongsantang), ~ (1803)
- Niu Yunzhen, "Shiji pingzhu (Notes and comments on the Record of the Great Historian)" (2001), Sanqin chubanshe
- Ogyū Sorai, "Rongo chō (Evidence to the Analects)" (1994), Heibonsha
- Wi Paekkyu, "Han’guk munjip ch’onggan (Comprehensive publication of Sino-Korean literary collections), Vol. 243" (2000), Minjok munwa ch’ujinhoe
- Wi Paekkyu, "Chonjae chŏnsŏ (Completed works of Chonjae), Vols. 1–2" (1974), Kyŏngin ch’ulp’ansa
- Yang Qiyuan, "Sishu yan (Looking into the Four Books)", Guoli bianyiguan
- Zhu Xi, "Sishu zhangju jizhu (Interlinear analysis of and collected commentaries on the Four Books)" (1983), Zhonghua shuju
- Bol, Peter K., "This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T’ang and Sung China" (1994), Stanford University Press
- Chang Kangisun, "The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, vol. 2" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Chow, Kaiwing, "The Rise of Confucian Ritualism in Late Imperial China: Ethics, Classics, and Lineage Discourse" (1994), Stanford University Press
- Chow, Kaiwing, "Writing for Success: Printing, Examinations, and Intellectual Change in Late Ming China", Late Imperial China, 17, pp.120~157 (1996)
- 정우봉, "한국 수사학사에 있어 ‘修辭’ 담론과 그 맥락", 민족문화연구, (45), pp.109~132 (2006), 민족문화연구원
- Denecke, Wiebke, "The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought from Confucius to Han Feizi" (2010), Harvard University Press
- Dong Hongli, "Mengzi yanjiu (Studies of the Mengzi)" (1997), Jiangsu guji chubanshe
- Elman, Benjamin A., "From Philosophy to Philology" (2001), UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series
- Elman, Benjamin A., "Political, Social, and Cultural Reproduction via Civil Service Examinations in Late Imperial China", Journal of Asian Studies, 50, pp.7~28 (1991)
- Guo Xiliang, "Hanzi guyin shouce (Handbook of ancient pronunciations of Chinese characters)" (2010), Beijing daxue chubanshe
- Hou Jiangbo, "Niu Yunzhen xueshu yuanyuan kaoshu (An analytical description of Niu Yunzhen’s academic origin)", Dezhou xueyan xuebao, 30, pp.7~9 (2014)
- Im Chong’uk, "Chungguk yŏktae inmyŏng sajŏn (Biographical dictionary of China through the ages)" (2010), Ihoe munwasa
- Indraccolo, Lisa, "What is Rhetoric Anyway? Briared in Words in Early China", Asiatische Studien, 68(1), pp.331~341 (2014)
- Jing Dongyan, "Niu Yunzhen zhuanlue (A biographical sketch of Niu Yunzhen)", Master, pp.2007
- Kim Sŏkhoe, "Chonjae Wi Paekkyu munhak yŏn’gu (A study of Chonjae Wi Paekkyu’s literary works)" (1995), Ihoe munwasa
- ")."
- "Reto’rik’e nŭn susahak in’ga? (Is the concept of rhêtorikê same with the concept of susahak?)", Han’guk susa hakhoe haksul taehoe, 5, pp.1~11 (2004)
- Koyasu Nobukuni, "Nihon shisōshi jiten (Dictionary of Japanese intellectual history)" (2001), Perikansha
- Li Changran, "Qingdai Mengzi xueshi dagang (Outline of the history of Mengzi studies in the Qing dynasty)" (2011), Beijing daxue chubanshe
- Li, Waiyee, "The Readability of the Past in Early Chinese Historiography" (2007), Harvard University Press
- Lipson, Carol S., "Rhetoric Before and Beyond the Greeks" (2004), SUNY Press
- Lu, Xing, "Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century, B.C.E.: A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric" (1998), University of South Carolina Press
- Mair, Victor H., "The Columbia History of Chinese Literature" (2012), Columbia University Press
- Maruyama Masao, "Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (Studies in the intellectual history of Tokugawa Japan)" (1958), Tōkyō daigaku shuppankai
- ), "Kokushigaku", 1986, 26~51
- ), "Master", Guangxi shifan daxue, 2002
- Sejong taewang kinyŏ m saŏ phoe, "Han’guk kojŏn yongŏ sajŏn (Dictionary of terms in Korean classics)", Sejong taewang kinyŏ m saŏ phoe, ~ (2001)
- Seki Kiyichirō, "Sisho chūsaku zensho (Collections of commentaries by Japanese scholars on the Four Books). Vol. 8" (1925), Bunken shokyoku
- Song Hyŏkki, "Chosŏn hugi hanmun sanmun ŭi iron kwa pip’yŏng (Theory and criticism of late–Chosŏn sinographic prose)" (2007), Wŏrin
- Tanaka Kayo, "Hirose Tansō no kenkyū(A biographical study of Hirose Tansō)" (1993), Perikansha
- Usui Katsumi, "Nihon kingendai jinmei jiten (Biographical dictionary of modern and contemporary Japanese)" (2001), Yoshikawa kōbunkan
- Van Zoeren, Steven, "Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China" (2007), Stanford University Press
- Wang Jianjun, "Niu Yunzhen Mengzi lunwen tanxi (In-depth analysis of Niu Yunzhen’s A literary analysis of the Mengzi)", Yangzhou daxue xuebao, 18, pp.73~81 (2014)
- Wang Li, "Hanyu shiluxue (Prosody of Chinese)" (2002), Shanghai shiji chuban jituan
- Weber, Ralph, "On Comparative Approaches to Rhetoric in Ancient China", Asiatische Studien, 68(4), pp.925~935 (2014)
- Xinzhong, Yao, "RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedia of Confucianism. Vol. 2" (2003), Routledge Curzon
- Yan Shiju, "Niu Yunzhen he tade xuexu sixiang ji chubanye (Niu Yunzhen’s academic thought and his contribution to the publishing business)", Sandong tushuguan jikan, 3, pp.53~54 (2000)
- Yi Haejun, "Chonjae Wi Paekkyu ŭi sahoe kaesŏllon (Chonjae Wi Paekkyu’s meliorism)", Master, pp.1979
- 이영호, "이탁오의 논어학과 명말 새로운 경학의 등장", 한국학, 31(4), pp.301~326 (2008), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- Yoshikawa Kōjirō, "Jinsai, Sorai, Norinaga (Three classical philologists of mid-Tokugawa Japan)" (2001), Iwanami shoten
- 유민정, "위백규의 수사학적 경전해석 - 孟子箚義를 중심으로", 퇴계학보, (143), pp.137~174 (2018), 퇴계학연구원[DOI]