The Early Intellectual Orientation of Takahashi Toru: The Pre-Chosŏn Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article explores the historical and educational background of Takahashi Toru (1868–1967), a pioneering scholar in the history of Chosŏn Confucianism. Previous research on Takahashi’s colonial historiography has focused mainly on his personal characteristics, whereas this article looks at the period in his life which most influenced his worldview and subsequent scholarship. To do this, it focuses on two articles he published in the year he graduated from the Department of Chinese Studies at Tokyo Imperial University. By looking at the professors who influenced him and their scholarly orientations, it is possible to identify the origins of his intellectual outlook. Shigeno Yasutsugu, a textual critic, taught him positivistic source critique, while Ludwig Riess, a Rankean, inspired Takahashi’s tendency to view nations as the main actors in history and to describe them in terms of national characteristics. In addition, Inoue Tetsujiro, an Orientalist scholar, implanted in Takahashi his own understanding of the history of Chinese philosophy. This viewpoint prioritizes philosophy over Chineses exegesis, and endorses the superiority of socially engaged Confucianism. This article shows that Takahashi’s later view that “Zhuzixue is monotonous" is a result of his acceptance of Inoue’s Orientalist approach to Chinese philosophy. I argue that the scholarly framework on the history of philosophy presented in the two Takahashi articles was the foundation for this later research on the history of Chosŏn Confucianism. He adopted a positivistic research approach based on the preconception that Zhuzixue was simplistic. At the same time, he endeavored to uncover distinctive national characteristics of the Chosŏn people.
Abstract
This article explores the historical and educational background of Takahashi Toru (1868–1967), a pioneering scholar in the history of Chosŏn Confucianism. Previous research on Takahashi’s colonial historiography has focused mainly on his personal characteristics, whereas this article looks at the period in his life which most influenced his worldview and subsequent scholarship. To do this, it focuses on two articles he published in the year he graduated from the Department of Chinese Studies at Tokyo Imperial University. By looking at the professors who influenced him and their scholarly orientations, it is possible to identify the origins of his intellectual outlook. Shigeno Yasutsugu, a textual critic, taught him positivistic source critique, while Ludwig Riess, a Rankean, inspired Takahashi’s tendency to view nations as the main actors in history and to describe them in terms of national characteristics. In addition, Inoue Tetsujiro, an Orientalist scholar, implanted in Takahashi his own understanding of the history of Chinese philosophy. This viewpoint prioritizes philosophy over Chineses exegesis, and endorses the superiority of socially engaged Confucianism. This article shows that Takahashi’s later view that “Zhuzixue is monotonous" is a result of his acceptance of Inoue’s Orientalist approach to Chinese philosophy. I argue that the scholarly framework on the history of philosophy presented in the two Takahashi articles was the foundation for this later research on the history of Chosŏn Confucianism. He adopted a positivistic research approach based on the preconception that Zhuzixue was simplistic. At the same time, he endeavored to uncover distinctive national characteristics of the Chosŏn people.
참고문헌 (44)
- "朝鮮敎化政敎: 高橋亨氏談", 每日申報, ~ (1919)
- Brownlee, John S, "Japanese Historians and the National Myths, 1600-1945 : The Age of the Gods and Emperor Jinmu" (1997), University of British Columbia Press
- 張志淵, (1922), Hoedong Sŏgwan
- 정준영, "국사와 동양학 사이의 좁은 틈: 경성제국 대학과 식민지의 ‘동양문화연구’", 역사문제연구, 41, pp.289~339 (2019)
- 鄭寅普, "陽明學演論", 東亞日報, ~ (1933)
- 兵藤裕己, "歴史研究における近代の成立：文学と史学のあいだ", 成城国文学論集, 25, pp.255~280 (1997)
- 井上哲次郞, "萬國東洋東洋學會景況", 哲学會雑誌, 1(3), pp.120~132 (1887)
- 井上哲次郞, "論說現象即實在論の要領", 哲學雜誌, 13(123), pp.377~396 (1897)
- 井上哲次郞, (1902), Fuzanbō
- 井上哲次郞, (1905), Fuzanbō
- 井上哲次郞, (1900), Fuzanbō
- Ito, Yushi., "Conflicting Views of Japan’s Mission in the World and National Moral Education : Yamaji Aizan and His Opponent Inoue Tetsujiro", Japan Forum, 22(3, pp.4) (2010), 307~330
- 桂島宣弘, (1999), Perikansha
- 김경래, "高橋亨의 ‘조선’ 연구와 사대주의론", 사학연구, 145, pp.295~332 (2022)
- 김태년, "학안에서 철학사로 - 조선유학사 서술의 관점과 방식에 대한 검토", 한국학연구, 23, pp.41~84 (2010)
- 町泉寿郎, "Bakumatsu Meijiki ni okeru gakujutsu kyogaku no keisei to kangaku", ~
- "日本漢文学研究", 2016, 133~154
- マーガレット・メール, "歴史学と史料研究" (2003), Yamakawa Shuppansha
- Mehl, Margaret, "History and the State in Nineteenth-Century Japan" (1998), Macmillan
- 三ツ井崇, "식민주의 역사학과 제국: 탈식민주의 역사학 연구를 위하여", pp.161~187 (2016), Ch’aek kwa Hamkke
- 三浦節夫, "井上哲次郎口述東洋哲学史の翻刻: 井上円了の東京大学文学部二年生の聴講ノート", 井上円了センター年報, 27, pp.127~168 (2019)
- 미야지마 히로시, (2013), Ch’angbi
- 水野博太, "高嶺三吉遺稿’中の井上哲次郎‘東洋哲学史’講義", 東京大学文書舘紀要, 36, pp.20~49 (2018)
- 나가하라 게이지, "20세기 일본의 역사학" (2011), Samch’olli
- 西川洋一, "歴史学と史料研究" (2003), Yamakawa Shuppansha
- Pyle, Kenneth B, "The New Generation in Meiji Japan : Problems of Cultural Identity, 1885-1895" (1969), Stanford University Press
- Riess, Ludwig, "Notes of a Course of Lectures on Universal History, vol. 1" (1892), Seishibunsha
- 桑兵, "近代‘中国哲学’发源", 學術與敎育, 11, pp.1~11 (2010)
- 佐々木人美, "武士学者・根本通明", 秋田県立博物館硏究報告, 34, pp.49~54 (2009)
- 重野安繹, "学問は遂に考証に帰す", 東京學士會院雜誌, 12(5), pp.191~211 (1890)
- 重野安繹, "國史編纂の方法を論ず", 東京學士會院雜誌, 1(8), pp.163~181 (1880)
- 重野安繹, "史学に従事する者は其心至公至平ならざるべからず", 史學會雜誌, 1, pp.1~4 (1889)
- 鈴置拓也, "井上哲次郎「支那哲学史を通してみる夏目漱石『老子の哲学』の特徴〈研究ノート〉", 二松学舎大学東アジア学術総合研究所集刊, 52, pp.43~70 (2022)
- "高橋先生年譜略", 朝鮮學報, 14, pp.1~13 (1959)
- 高橋亨, "朝鮮思想史大系. 第1冊: 李朝佛敎" (1929), 大阪宝文館
- 高橋亨, "漢易を難して根本博士の易説に及ぶ", 哲學雜誌, 189 (1903)
- 高橋亨, "高橋亨 朝鮮儒學論集", pp.175~350 (2011), Chisen Shokan
- 高橋亨, "高瀬文學士著楊墨哲學を評す", 哲學雜誌, 186 (1902)
- 東京帝國大學, "東京帝國大學五十年史・上" (1932), Tokyo Teikoku Daigaku
- 東京帝國大學, (1895), Tōkyō Teikoku Daigaku
- 東京大学百年史編集委員会, (1986), Tōkyō Daigaku
- 宇野哲人, "日本における李退溪研究", 退溪學報, 1, pp.22~27 (1973)
- 이혜경, "주자학이 전근대의 대표이념이 되기까지: 후쿠자와 유키치와 이노우에 데쓰지로의 유학을 둘러싼 공방", 東洋哲學硏究, 108, pp.335~372 (2021)
- 이혜경, "근대 일본의 유학 전유와 중국철학사 서술의 방향 - 다카세 다케지로를 중심으로", 철학사상, 74, pp.29~62 (2019)