Homogeneity of Sŏktok kugyŏl 釋讀口訣 and Hyangch’al 鄕札 and Principle of Hyangch’al Composition
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study compares the hyangch’al 鄕札 of the Silla 新羅 Kingdom (57 BCE–935 CE) and the sŏktok kugyŏl 釋讀口訣 of the Koryŏ 高麗 (918–1392) dynasty. Both hyangch’al and kugyŏl incorporated borrowed characters (ch’aja 借字) from Chinese to phrase the Korean vernacular. Although hyangch’al is older than kugyŏl, materials written in hyangch’al demonstrate a similar usage of borrowed sinographs and analogous syntactic structures. This affinity between the two systems implies they were created in similar cultural contexts by a similar social class. Based on this, the paper reexamines a well-known principle of hyangch’al, called hunju ŭmjong 訓主音從, wherein word segments in hyangch’al consist of hunch’a 訓借 (sinographs borrowed as semantograms) and ŭmch’a 音借 (sinographs borrowed for their sound), which together comprise ch’aja 借字 or borrowed sinographs. However, the complications inherent to the differentiation of hunch’a and ŭmch’a have led to another crucial division between ch’aja and normal Sinitic being neglected, resulting in a misleading interpretation of hyangch’al. In kugyŏl, a word segment comprises normal Sinitic first followed by sinographs, a rule that also applies to hyangch’al. We call this hanju ch’ajong 漢主借從 (Sinitic leads, borrowed usage follows). This paper reclassifies the four categories of hyangch’al characters and applies this reclassification to the reading of hyangga 鄕歌 songs recorded in hyangch’al. This approach to utilizing findings from research into kugyŏl allows for a more accurate translation of hyangga songs.
Abstract
This study compares the hyangch’al 鄕札 of the Silla 新羅 Kingdom (57 BCE–935 CE) and the sŏktok kugyŏl 釋讀口訣 of the Koryŏ 高麗 (918–1392) dynasty. Both hyangch’al and kugyŏl incorporated borrowed characters (ch’aja 借字) from Chinese to phrase the Korean vernacular. Although hyangch’al is older than kugyŏl, materials written in hyangch’al demonstrate a similar usage of borrowed sinographs and analogous syntactic structures. This affinity between the two systems implies they were created in similar cultural contexts by a similar social class. Based on this, the paper reexamines a well-known principle of hyangch’al, called hunju ŭmjong 訓主音從, wherein word segments in hyangch’al consist of hunch’a 訓借 (sinographs borrowed as semantograms) and ŭmch’a 音借 (sinographs borrowed for their sound), which together comprise ch’aja 借字 or borrowed sinographs. However, the complications inherent to the differentiation of hunch’a and ŭmch’a have led to another crucial division between ch’aja and normal Sinitic being neglected, resulting in a misleading interpretation of hyangch’al. In kugyŏl, a word segment comprises normal Sinitic first followed by sinographs, a rule that also applies to hyangch’al. We call this hanju ch’ajong 漢主借從 (Sinitic leads, borrowed usage follows). This paper reclassifies the four categories of hyangch’al characters and applies this reclassification to the reading of hyangga 鄕歌 songs recorded in hyangch’al. This approach to utilizing findings from research into kugyŏl allows for a more accurate translation of hyangga songs.
참고문헌 (33)
- "."
- Hyŏngnyŏn Chŏng 赫連挺, (1986), Saemunsa
- [URL]
- ". Vol. 46. 1145"[URL]
- ". Vol. 3. 1251"[URL]
- ". Vols. 51, 59"[URL]
- ". Vol. 36"[URL]
- "Kugyŏl yŏn’gu 口訣硏究", 1996, 403~465
- "Kugŏhak 國語學", 1987, 41~54
- 장윤희, "鄕札 硏究의 回顧와 展望", 구결연구, (21), pp.203~230 (2008), 구결학회[DOI]
- "Sae kugŏsaenghwal 새국어생활", 1997, 31~59
- Cleary, Thomas, "The Flower Ornament Script : A Translation of the Avatamsaka Sutra" (1993), Shambhala
- Handel, Zev, "Sinography : The Borrowing and Adaptation of the Chinese Script" (2019), Brill
- "Chōsen ihō朝鮮彙報", 1918, 71~99
- Kim Kichung, "An Introduction to Classical Korean Literature : From Hyangga to P’ansori" (1996), M. E. Sharpe
- Kim Wanjin 金完鎭, (1980), Sŏul Taehakkyo Ch’ulp’anbu
- "Kugyŏl yŏn’gu 口訣硏究", 1997, 1~25
- Kin Bunkyō, "Literary Sinitic and East Asia: A Cultural Sphere of Vernacular Reading" (2021), Brill
- Lee, Peter H., "The Columbia Anthology of Traditional Korean Poetry" (2002), Columbia University Press
- Lee, Peter H., "A History of Korean Literature" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Lee, Peter H., "Studies in the Saenaennorae : Old Korean Poetry" (1959), Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente
- Nam Kwŏnhŭi 南權熙, (2002), Ch’ŏngju Koinswae Pangmulgwan
- 남풍현, "<怨歌>의 解讀", 國語學, (83), pp.3~34 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- "Tongyanghak", 1976, 1~67
- "Kugyŏl yŏn’gu", 1998, 195~251
- 박재민, "향가 해독 100년의 연구사 및 전망 -향찰 체계의 인식과 古語의 발굴 정도를 중심으로-", 한국시가연구, 45, pp.49~113 (2018), 한국시가학회[DOI]
- Rutt, Richard, "Flower Boys of Shilla(Hwarang) : Notes on the Sources", Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 38, pp.1~66 (1961)
- "Misul charyo 美術資料", 1975, 19~40
- Sŏ Chaegŭk 서재극, (1975), Kyemyŏng Taehakkyo Ch’ulp’anbu
- Yang Chudong 梁柱東, (1942), Pangmun Sŏgwan
- Yi Iksŏp 李翊燮, (1986), Hagyŏnsa
- Yu Ch’anggyun 兪昌均, (1994), Hyŏngsŏl Ch’ulp’ansa