본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Ars dictaminis como Ars amatoria y su estrategia paródica en las continuaciones de La Celestina

Ars dictaminis as Ars amatoria and its Parodic Strategy in the Continuations of The Celestina

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The aim of this study is to reveal the literary historical background of the inclusion of love letters in the continuations of The Celestina as well as its function in the plot development. In fact, the use of love letters in literary works is not a new one. Before the celestinesque continuations appeared in the first half of the sixteenth century, the authors had used it in their works to attract the reader’s interest from the Heroides of Ovidius to the Spanish Sentimental Romance. Thus, the introduction of love letters in the celestinesque continuations is a reflection of the changing literary taste of the public. The formation of a new class of readers during the Renaissance demanded new types of literary genres, and to this demand the continuators responded with literary works that strengthen the popular aspects like the complicated love affairs between the characters. The inclusion of love letters also contributes to the creation of a dramatic work that is different from The Celestina through the degradation of the role of the matchmaker. Nevertheless, the function of love letters is not the same in the continuations according to the intention of the continuators. The introduction of love letters in the celestinesque continuations is an obvious proof of emulative consciousness of the authors to create a new literary world that is distinguished from the work of Rojas.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the literary historical background of the inclusion of love letters in the continuations of The Celestina as well as its function in the plot development. In fact, the use of love letters in literary works is not a new one. Before the celestinesque continuations appeared in the first half of the sixteenth century, the authors had used it in their works to attract the reader’s interest from the Heroides of Ovidius to the Spanish Sentimental Romance. Thus, the introduction of love letters in the celestinesque continuations is a reflection of the changing literary taste of the public. The formation of a new class of readers during the Renaissance demanded new types of literary genres, and to this demand the continuators responded with literary works that strengthen the popular aspects like the complicated love affairs between the characters. The inclusion of love letters also contributes to the creation of a dramatic work that is different from The Celestina through the degradation of the role of the matchmaker. Nevertheless, the function of love letters is not the same in the continuations according to the intention of the continuators. The introduction of love letters in the celestinesque continuations is an obvious proof of emulative consciousness of the authors to create a new literary world that is distinguished from the work of Rojas.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Aguirre, J. M, "Calisto y Melibea : Amantes Cortesanos" (1962), Almenara
  2. Alatorre, Antonio, "Sobre traducciones castellanas de Las Heroidas", NRFH, 3, pp.162~166 (1949)
  3. Boase, Roger, "The Origin and Meaning of Courtly Love : A Critical Study of European Scholarship" (1977), Manchester University Press
  4. "Introducción" (2003)[URL]
  5. Capellanus, Andreas, "The Art of Courtly Love" (1990), Norton & Company
  6. Chevalier, Maxime, "Lectura y lectores en la España del siglo XVI y XVII" (1976), Turner
  7. Copenhagen, Carol, "Salutations in Fifteenth-Century Spanish Vernacular Letters", La Corónica, 12(2), pp.254~265 (1984)
  8. Córdoba, Ibn Hazm de, "El collar de la paloma" (2005), Alianza
  9. Curtius, Ernst Robert, "Literatura europea y Edad Media Latina" (1999), Fondo de Cultura Económica
  10. Díez Borque, José María, "Biblioteca y novela en el Siglo de Oro", HR, 75(2), pp.181~202 (2007)
  11. 정동희, "Un ejemplo de la emulación literaria: el caso de la Segunda Celestina(1534) de Feliciano de Silva", 스페인어문학, (78), pp.37~65 (2016), 한국스페인어문학회
  12. Eichenbaum, Boris, "Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays", pp.99~140 (1965), University of Nebraska Press
  13. Esteban Martín, "La carta amorosa en la trama de la descendencia directa de Celestina", LEMIR, 7, pp.1~25 (2003)
  14. Frye, Northrop, "Anatomy of Criticism : Four Essays" (1971), Princeton Univ Press
  15. García Mondelo, Nancy, "El género epistolar y Los consejos de Celestina en un pliego suelto del siglo XVI", Cel, 24, pp.29~46 (2000)
  16. Gómez de Toledo, Gaspar, "Tercera parte de la tragicomedia de Celestina" (1973), University of Pennsylvania Press
  17. González, Aurelio, "Edad Media: Marginalidad y oficialidad" (1998), UNAM
  18. Guillén, Claudio, "Renaissance Genres: Essays on Theory, History, and Interpretation", pp.70~104 (1986), Harvard Univ Press
  19. Hutcheon, Linda, "A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieh-Century Art Forms" (1985), Methuen
  20. Jiménez de Urrea, "Penitencia de amor" (1996), Akal
  21. Kany, Charles, "The Beginnings of the Epistolary Novel in France, Italy and Spain" (1937), University of California Press
  22. Lacarra, María Eugenia, "La parodia de la ficción sentimental en la Celestina", Cel, 13(1), pp.11~29 (1989)
  23. Lausberg, Heinrich, "Manuel de retórica literaria" (1990), Gredos
  24. Lawrance, Jeremy, "Academia Literaria Renacentista V: Literatura en la época del Emperador", pp.81~99 (1988), Universidad de Salamanca
  25. Lida de Malkiel, "La originalidad artística de la Celestina" (1970), EUDEBA
  26. López Estrada, Francisco, "Antología de Epistolas" (1960), Labor
  27. Malón de Chaide, Pedro, "La conversión de la Magdalena", Lorenzo Blanco
  28. Martín Baños, Pedro, "El arte epistolar en el Renacimiento europeo : 1400-1600" (2005), Universidad de Deusto
  29. Menéndez Pelayo, Marcelino, "Orígenes de la novela, Vol 4" (1961), CSIC
  30. Muñón, Sancho de, "Tragicomedia de Lisandro y Roselia", pp.2009~ (2009), Cátedra
  31. Navarro Gala, "La parodia de la carta de amores en la Segunda Celestina", Cel, 28, pp.69~99 (2004)
  32. Ovidio, "Cartas de las heroínas" (1994), Gredos
  33. Arte de amor, "Amores", pp.2000, Ovidio
  34. Rojas, Fernando de, "La Celestina" (2000), Crítica
  35. Roubaud, Silvia y Monique Joly, "Cartas son cartas : apuntes sobre la carta fuera del género epistolar", Criticón, 30, pp.103~125 (1985)
  36. Shklovsky, Victor, "Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays", pp.3~57 (1965), University of Nebraska Press
  37. Silva, Feliciano de, "Segunda Celestina" (1988), Cátedra
  38. Stewart, Susan, "Nonsense: Aspects of Intertextuality in Folklore and Literature" (1979), The Johns Hopkins Univ Press
  39. Trueba Lawand, Jamile, "El arte epistolar en el Renacimiento español" (1996), Tamesis
  40. Villegas Selvago, Alonso de, "Comedia llamada Selvagia" (1873), Rivadeneyra
  41. Whinnom, Keith, "Diego de San Pedro, Obras completas II: Cárcel de amor" (1993), Castalia
  42. Yinduráin, Domingo, "Las cartas de Laureola(Beber cenizas)", Edad de Oro, 3, pp.299~309 (1984)
  43. Yinduráin, Domingo, "Academia Literaria Renacentista V: Literatura en la época del Emperador", pp.53~79 (1988), Universidad de Salamanca

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)