본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韓・中 소비자법제 기본법의 비교

A Comparative Study on Fundamental Law of Consumer Legal System between Korea and China

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Differences exist between the formation of consumer legal system and the regulations under fundamental consumer protection laws in Korea and China. Nevertheless, the trend in both countries are similar in that consumers' sovereignty has been emphasized and that reliefs for consumers have been strengthened. Moreover, consumers' rights have been strengthened, while the state executives' responsibilities towards consumers have also been strengthened. There are following differences in the consumer legal systems as well as their respective fundamental laws between Korea and China: With respect to legislation, the legislative backgrounds and mechanisms as well as the main norms are different. China is strengthening the consumer protection by prescribing detailed legal liabilities of business operators who infringe consumers' rights and interests, whereas Korea emphasizes on security issues of consumers and thus strengthened consumers' safety through series of amendments. With respect to consumer obligations, Korean law emphasizes on such issue more than China. The Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interest provides the obligation of the state and business operators, but there are no provision on the obligations or responsibilities of consumers. In contrast, Korea's Consumer Fundamental Act in force prescribes the "responsibilities of consumers," thereby emphasizing the obligation of consumer. With respect to obligations of the state and local governments, the Korean law tends to emphasize this issue as well. Consumers must be educated in order to make them being responsible for their own consumer life. Moreover, it is also responsibilities of the state and local governments to enhance consumers' ability as the economy and society develops. Compared with other Asian countries, China have enacted the consumer rights law only in recent years and no amendments have been made yet. But it is expected that the consumer rights law will be amended in the near future with the distinctive Chinese features.

Abstract

Differences exist between the formation of consumer legal system and the regulations under fundamental consumer protection laws in Korea and China. Nevertheless, the trend in both countries are similar in that consumers' sovereignty has been emphasized and that reliefs for consumers have been strengthened. Moreover, consumers' rights have been strengthened, while the state executives' responsibilities towards consumers have also been strengthened. There are following differences in the consumer legal systems as well as their respective fundamental laws between Korea and China: With respect to legislation, the legislative backgrounds and mechanisms as well as the main norms are different. China is strengthening the consumer protection by prescribing detailed legal liabilities of business operators who infringe consumers' rights and interests, whereas Korea emphasizes on security issues of consumers and thus strengthened consumers' safety through series of amendments. With respect to consumer obligations, Korean law emphasizes on such issue more than China. The Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interest provides the obligation of the state and business operators, but there are no provision on the obligations or responsibilities of consumers. In contrast, Korea's Consumer Fundamental Act in force prescribes the "responsibilities of consumers," thereby emphasizing the obligation of consumer. With respect to obligations of the state and local governments, the Korean law tends to emphasize this issue as well. Consumers must be educated in order to make them being responsible for their own consumer life. Moreover, it is also responsibilities of the state and local governments to enhance consumers' ability as the economy and society develops. Compared with other Asian countries, China have enacted the consumer rights law only in recent years and no amendments have been made yet. But it is expected that the consumer rights law will be amended in the near future with the distinctive Chinese features.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 신현윤, "경제법(제2판)" (2007), 법문사
  2. 김원기, "소비자보호법" (2007), 대명출판사
  3. 이기수, "경제법(제7판)" (2006), 세창출판사
  4. 양명조, "경제법강의" (2006), 신조사
  5. 박상룡, "경제법원론" (2006), 박영사
  6. 권오승, "소비자보호법(제5판)" (2005), 법문사
  7. 강창경, "개정 소비자보호법 해설" (1996), 한국소비자보호원
  8. 소비자보호부문계획위원회, "제7차 경제사회개발5개년계획 소비자보호부문계획(안)" (1991)
  9. 박수혁, "우리나라 소비자보호법제의 개선방향", 헌법학연구, 3 (1997)
  10. 송보경, "소비자운동 -저항인가 협력인가" (1988), 소비자문제를 연구하는 모임
  11. 한상돈, "중국 반독점법의 시행과 유념해야 할 점", 법률신문 (2007)
  12. 김성천, "소비자보호형법에 관한 소고" (1997)
  13. "한국소비자원"[URL]
  14. , 법제처[URL]
  15. 吳景明, "消費者權益保護法" (2007), 中國政法大學出版社
  16. 董朝陽, "經濟法" (2007), 淸華大學出版社
  17. 楊紫, "經濟法" (2005), 北京大學出版社
  18. 回?明, "消費者權益保護法及配套規定新釋新解" (2004), 人民法院出版社
  19. 馬 原, "消費者權益保護法分解適用集成" (2004), 人民法院出版社
  20. 盛杰民, "經濟法槪論" (2003), 人民法院出版社
  21. "淺談消費者權益保護法"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)