유럽인권재판소의 구제절차와 판결의 국내법적 효력-독일의 사례를 중심으로-
The Effect as the Domestic Law on Remedial Procedure and Judgment in the European Court of Human Rights - Focusing on Germany's Case -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The European Court of Human Rights can be said to be a globally unique court of law, which makes judicial decision on basic rights of being secured in the European Convention on Human Rights. The huge activity in the European Court of Human Rights has jurisdiction over Human Rights Abuse lawsuit that 800 million people received from a country when it comes to population in the whole area of Europe. However, it is a point of being a law-court of handling fundamental rights, which has extensive jurisdiction, given analyzing the most important characteristic in the European Court of Human Rights from the legal perspective. Also, it is a court of justice pertinent to fundamental rights based on international law called the European Convention on Human Rights. However, what enforced the convention with the procedure as saying of making judgment of having legal binding force by which the European Court of Human Rights has a trial of a problem about human rights abuse raised by an individual is from after when No. 11 Protocol took effect in 1998 given examining it objectively. This study aims to analyze the current system and the old system after broadly viewing convention execution system. And, the aim is to mention focusing on a decision case in the Court of Human Rights after discussing and surveying about the nature as the domestic law on the convention of human rights, which becomes a problem in Germany, and about the effect as the domestic law on judgment in the European Court of Human Rights.
Abstract
The European Court of Human Rights can be said to be a globally unique court of law, which makes judicial decision on basic rights of being secured in the European Convention on Human Rights. The huge activity in the European Court of Human Rights has jurisdiction over Human Rights Abuse lawsuit that 800 million people received from a country when it comes to population in the whole area of Europe. However, it is a point of being a law-court of handling fundamental rights, which has extensive jurisdiction, given analyzing the most important characteristic in the European Court of Human Rights from the legal perspective. Also, it is a court of justice pertinent to fundamental rights based on international law called the European Convention on Human Rights. However, what enforced the convention with the procedure as saying of making judgment of having legal binding force by which the European Court of Human Rights has a trial of a problem about human rights abuse raised by an individual is from after when No. 11 Protocol took effect in 1998 given examining it objectively. This study aims to analyze the current system and the old system after broadly viewing convention execution system. And, the aim is to mention focusing on a decision case in the Court of Human Rights after discussing and surveying about the nature as the domestic law on the convention of human rights, which becomes a problem in Germany, and about the effect as the domestic law on judgment in the European Court of Human Rights.
참고문헌 (28)
- 전정환, "독일헌법판례Ⅱ(상)" (2007), 원광헌법학연구회
- 전정환, "독일헌법판례Ⅲ(중)" (2012), 원광헌법학회연구회
- 岡田悅典, "弁護のための国際人権法" (2002), 現代人文会社
- 建石真公子, "ヨーロッパ人権条約" (1997), 有信堂
- 齊藤正彰, "国法体系で憲法と条約" (2002), 信山社
- 建石真公子, "フランスにおけるヨーロッパ人権条約の批准の遲延の理由と国民主権(1) 第4․第5共和制憲法と超国家的性格の人権条約", 名古屋大学法廷論集, (161) (1995)
- 大塚泰寿, "ヨーロッパ人権条約における友好的解決に関する考察", 国際協力研究, (2) (2001)
- 門田孝, "日獨憲法学の創造力下券" (2003), 信山社
- 小畑郁, "第一四議定書によるヨーロッパ人権条約実施規定等の改正", 法廷論集, (205) (2004), 名古大学
- 薬師寺公夫, "人権裁判所に対する個人の訴権(ヨーロッパ人権条約第9議定書)", 立命館法学, (217) (1991)
- 薬師寺公夫, "自由権規約選択議定書5條2項(a)に対する留保", 研究紀要, (8) (2003), 世界人権問題研究センター
- 左藤文夫, "ヨーロッパ人権条約と個人- 公正な満足付与の問題を中心に-", 成城法学, (7) (1980)
- 前田徹生, "男性のみに消防奉仕活動․消防活動負担金を義務づける州法の合憲性", 自治硏究, 73(3) (1997)
- 芹田健太郞, "ヨーロッパ人権委員会の活動とその性格(下)", 法学論叢, 78(2) (1996)
- "Appendix I to: Elisabeth LAMBERT-ABDELGAWAD, The Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights", Coucil of Europe, ~ (2002)
- Bergmann, "Diener dreier Herren? - Der Instanzrichter zwischen BVerfG", EuGH und EGMR, ~ (2006)
- Ekardt, "EuGH, EGMR und BVerfG", KJ (2006)
- European Court on Human Rights, "Survey of Activities", ~ (2006)
- "European Convention on Human Rights-Collected Texts", Council of Europe, ~ (1994)
- FLAUSS, "Jean-François, La Cour européene droits de l'homme est-elle une Cour constitutionnele?", RFDC, (36) (1998)
- Frédéric SUDRE, "La Convention européenne des droit de l'homme" (2004), PUF
- Jaeger, "Menschenrechtsschutz im Herzen Europas", EuGRZ (2005)
- Mückl, "Kooperration lder Konfrontation? - das Verhältnis zwischen BundesVerfassungsrecht und Europäischem Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte", Der Staat, ~ (2005)
- Philip LEACH, "Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights" (2005), Oxford UP
- Ress, "Verfassungsrechtliche Auswirkung der Fortwicklung völkerrechtlicher Verträgejss", FS Zeidler Ⅱ, ~ (1987)
- ROUSSEAU, Dominique, "De la démocratie continue", La démocratie continue, ~ (1995)
- S.K. MARTENS, "The Dynamics of the Protection of Human Rights in Eurpe; Essays in Honour of Henry G, Schermers, Vol. Ⅲ" (1994), Martinus Nijhof
- TRECHSEL, Stefan, "Article 30. PETTITI, Louis-Edmond et autres", La Convention européenne des droit de l'homme, ~ (1999)