본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지방자치단체의 법해석권과 제주특별자치도법

The authority of the local government on statutory interpretation and the special act on the Jeju special self-governing Province

3

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

At the present time, the local autonomy is guaranteed at the constitution. The decentralization becomes the core of the local autonomy as well as the national development. The local government has the right to dispose all affairs in local region on self-responsibility. It can be said the autonomy is exercised through the power of statutory interpretation. Traditionally, the statutory interpretation of the central government has been understood as to has the legal priority, when there is a contradictory in administrative statutory interpretation between central and local government. Nowadays, judged from viewpoint of the constitutional guarantee of Local Autonomy and the principle of subsidiarity, or the vertical separation of powers between the local government and central government, the local government can be said that it has legal priority of statutory interpretation, especially concerning on autonomous affairs of local government. On the study of legal priority of statutory interpretation, Jeju Special Self-governing Province is so special. Because the special act on the Jeju special self-governing Province has the special regulations such as to be organization of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and to delegate most of legal powers of the central government to Jeju Province, to minimize the involvement of the central government and to ensure their autonomous decisions on the future of Jeju. Especially it can be seen through not only allowing Jeju government to directly intervene in the revision process of the special act but also installing of Audit Committee in the Jeju Province to rule out the Audit of the central government. Shortly concluded, local government has the power to interpret on the law of local affairs. In particular, the government of Jeju Special Self-governing Province has the right of more special autonomous statutory interpretation than the other local government.

Abstract

At the present time, the local autonomy is guaranteed at the constitution. The decentralization becomes the core of the local autonomy as well as the national development. The local government has the right to dispose all affairs in local region on self-responsibility. It can be said the autonomy is exercised through the power of statutory interpretation. Traditionally, the statutory interpretation of the central government has been understood as to has the legal priority, when there is a contradictory in administrative statutory interpretation between central and local government. Nowadays, judged from viewpoint of the constitutional guarantee of Local Autonomy and the principle of subsidiarity, or the vertical separation of powers between the local government and central government, the local government can be said that it has legal priority of statutory interpretation, especially concerning on autonomous affairs of local government. On the study of legal priority of statutory interpretation, Jeju Special Self-governing Province is so special. Because the special act on the Jeju special self-governing Province has the special regulations such as to be organization of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and to delegate most of legal powers of the central government to Jeju Province, to minimize the involvement of the central government and to ensure their autonomous decisions on the future of Jeju. Especially it can be seen through not only allowing Jeju government to directly intervene in the revision process of the special act but also installing of Audit Committee in the Jeju Province to rule out the Audit of the central government. Shortly concluded, local government has the power to interpret on the law of local affairs. In particular, the government of Jeju Special Self-governing Province has the right of more special autonomous statutory interpretation than the other local government.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 박균성, "행정법강의 제4판" (2007), 박영사
  2. 양건, "새로운 헌법 필요한가" (2008), 대화문화아카데미
  3. 홍정선, "신지방자치법" (2009), 박영사
  4. 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" (2012), 박영사
  5. 박영욱, "쟁점으로 보는 제주특별자치도법" (2011), 한국학술정보(주)
  6. 구본규, "일본의 국가와 자치단체 간의 소송제도와 지방자치법상 새로운 소송제도의 도입에 관한 검토", 법제 (2012)
  7. 김기진, "행정의 개념에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.87~108 (2008), 법학연구원
  8. 김순은, "지방자치 20년의 성과와 과제", 국회입법조사처보, (여름) (2014)
  9. 김재경, "지방자치 20년을 진단하다", 국회입법조사처보, (여름)
  10. 문상덕, "지방자치단체의 자주적 법해석권", 행정법연구, (5) (1999)
  11. 문상덕, "행정과정론의 의의와 한계", 한림법학 (2001)
  12. 민기, "특별자치도의 지속 가능한 발전을 위한 탐색", 제주특별자치도 출범 8주년 기념 학술세미나자료 (2014)
  13. 서보경, "제주특별자치도 설치 및 국제자유도시 육성을 위한 특별법의 해설 및 주요심사사항", 법제 (2006)
  14. 신봉기, "지방분권특별법의 제정방향", 지방자치법연구, 통권 : 6
  15. 윤명선, "권력분립원리에 관한 재조명", 미국헌법연구, 18(1), pp.1~38 (2007), 미국헌법학회
  16. 이상수, "새로운 정부유권해석제도 해설", 법제 (2005)
  17. 정준현, "법령해석제도의 개선방향에 관한 소고", 법제 (2006)
  18. 조성규, "행정법령의 해석과 지방자치권", 행정법연구, (32), pp.1~29 (2012), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)[DOI]
  19. 표명환, "지방자치법상의 ‘특별자치도’의 의미와 그 문제 - 제주특별자치도법을 중심으로 -", 공법학연구, 10(4), pp.139~168 (2009), 한국비교공법학회
  20. 한귀현, "지방자치법상 보충성의 원칙에 관한 연구", 공법학연구, 13(3), pp.249~278 (2012), 한국비교공법학회[DOI]
  21. 안전행정부, "행정안전백서" (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)