본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

当代中国金融创新中的风险与监管 ——兼谈“影子银行”与“监管沙盒”

Risk and Regulation in Contemporary China's Financial Innovation : Shadow Bank and Regulatory Sandbox

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

中国金融发展已有千年历史,其始终是封建帝国统治赖以维系的支柱之一。当代中国金融体系的恢复与重建始于1978年十一届三中全会,至2018年的四十年时间里,逐渐构建起以中国人民银行(简称“央行”)、证监会、银监会、保监会(简称“一行三会”)为主体的金融分业监管体制。而这一体系,在2018年3月召开的第十三届全国人大一次会议上,被调整为由金融稳定发展委员会、央行、证监会、银保监会(简称“一委+一行+两会”)组成的新框架,并逐步向混业监管体制发展。促成该变革的重要因素之一便是“中国式”影子银行的野蛮生长,其中分业监管弊端以及金融基本立法缺位责无旁贷。目前大量金融创新公司集聚中国,积极借鉴域外金融监管立法经验,则是实现金融创新国际竞争力与国内金融市场稳定的关键。

Abstract

China's financial system has been envolving for thousands of years, providing foundation for the ruling of the feudal empire. The restoration and reconstruction of the contemporary Chinese financial system began in the Chinese Eleventh CPC Central Committee Third Plenary Session, 1978. In the four decades reaching 2018, the financial regulatory framework gradually came into shape, of which the four pillars include the People's Bank of China (hereinafter, PBOC), the China Securities Regulatory Commission (hereinafter, CSRC), the China Banking Regulatory Commission (hereinafter, CBRC) and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission (hereinafter, CIRC) (hereafter together referred to as “One Bank, Three Commissions”). This framework was further adjusted in March 2018 during the First Meeting of The Thirteenth National People's Congress of People's Republic of China. It is now composed of the Financial Stability and Development Committee (hereinafter, FSDC), the PBOC, the CSRC and China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (hereinafter, CBIRC) (hereafter referred to as “One Committee, One Bank, Two Commissions”), gradually developing into an integrated financial supervision network. One of the important factors that contributed to this change was the wild growth of “Chinese-style” shadow banking. The disadvantages of institutional financial regulation and the lack of basic financial legislations must share the blame. At present, a large number of financial innovation companies are striving in China, actively borrowing practical experiences from extraterritorial financial supervision legislations. They are the key in achieving the international competitiveness of financial innovation and the stability of domestic financial markets.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 千家驹, "中国货币史纲要", pp.14~30 (1986), 人民出版社
  2. 樊树志, "国史概要", pp.148~ (2010), 复旦大学出版社
  3. 李飞, "中国金融通史(第1卷)先秦至清鸦片战争时期", pp.587~595 (2002), 中国金融出版社
  4. 桑润生, "简明近代金融史", pp.40~42 (1995), 立信会计出版社
  5. 李玫, "银行法", pp.53~ (2014), 对外经贸大学出版社
  6. 范健, "证券法", pp.47~ (2010), 法律出版社
  7. 吴晓求, "改革开放四十年:中国金融的变革与发展", 经济理论与经济管理, (11), pp.26~38 (2018)
  8. 刘鸿儒, "探索中国资本市场发展之路:理论创新推动制度创新", pp.43~ (2003), 中国金融出版社
  9. 朱伟一, "中国式影子银行的法律定性", 中国政法大学学报, (4), pp.80~ (2014)
  10. 郑惠莲, "论民间借贷的立法规制", 南京社会科学, (08), pp.103~ (2012)
  11. 范健, "民法典编纂背景下商事立法体系与商法通则立法研究", 中国法律评论, (1), pp.87~ (2017)
  12. 王涌, "让资产管理行业回归大信托的格局", 清华金融评论, (1), pp.82~ (2018)
  13. 高圣平, "动产让与担保的立法论", 中外法学, (5), pp.1199~1200 (2017)
  14. 杨光, "融资融券业务担保物法律性质的界定——以账户体系为视角", 证券市场导报, (6), pp.63~65 (2018)
  15. 郭雳, "中国式影子银行的风险溯源与监管创新", 中国法学, (3), pp.212~221 (2018)
  16. 郭雳, "中国式影子银行——缘起、特色与出路", 新常态下的金融法治创新——中国银行法学研究会2015年年会, pp.128~130 (2015)
  17. 楼建波, "法院判决对中国影子银行业务的间接激励——金融商法的视角", 清华法学, (06), pp.60~ (2017)
  18. 沈伟, "中国的影子银行风险及规制工具选择", 中国法学, 4, pp.165~ (2014)
  19. "中国影子银行规模降至61.3万亿 为两年来最低"[URL]
  20. 刘定华, "金融监管的立法原则与模式", 法学研究, (5), pp.108~119 (2002)
  21. "国务院金融稳定发展委员会成立并召开第一次会议"[URL]
  22. 黄辉, "中国金融监管体制改革的逻辑与路径:国际经验与本土选择", 法学家, (03), pp.135~ (2019)
  23. "ICO不等同于区块链 监管沙盒并不适合中国"[URL]
  24. 廖凡, "金融科技背景下监管沙盒的理论与实践评析", 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (2), pp.18~19 (2019)
  25. 张红伟, "我国对FinTech有必要实施沙盒监管吗?", 证券市场导报, (07), pp.13~ (2018)
  26. 威廉, "千年金融史", pp.56~ (2017), 中信出版社
  27. "The Future of Finance is Emerging: New Hubs, New Landscapes (Global Fintech Hub Report)"[URL]
  28. 何力, "大数据已成为多彩贵州亮丽名片", 中国新闻出版广电报,2019年6月3日第003版, ~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)