한주 이진상과 화서 이항로 사단칠정론의 대비적 고찰

Abstract

his thesis is aimed at revealing their theoretical differences, which is Hanju Lee, Jin-sang(1818-1886) and Hwaseo Lee, hang-lo(1792~1868) sadanchiljunglon of contrast study. Both Hanju and Hwaseo are a Confucian scholar who represents the Toegye School and Yulgok School in the late 19th century. In view of this, the contrasting study of Hanju and Hwaseo are the theoretical differences between Toegye and the Yulgok sadanchiljunglon. Because, as you can see in the text of the text, they all interpretation based on the Toegye and the Yulgokhe theory. In the text of the text, we clearly examine the theoretical differences by Hanju and Hwaseo sadanchiljunglon of contrast study. At the same time, I would like to see how the theory of Toegye and Yulgok was deployed in the nineteenth century. To sum up, based on the thesis(性發爲情), even though interpret sadan and chiljung as Libal, on the other hand, according to Juli and Juki division, interpreted as an opposing concept. The former corresponds to a representative incident of Yulgok and the latter corresponds to the positive thinking of Toegye. It is also a feature of Hanju and Hwaseo sadanchiljunglon, which distinguishes between Toegye and Yulgok. Because of this, it also called for the combined of Toegye and Yulgok.