『한비자(韓非子)』의 법철학 - 도(道)와 법(法)의 관계를 중심으로
Philosophy of Law in the Hanfeizi -Focusing on the relationship between Dao and Fa
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Han Feizi’s thought, fa (法), one of the critical ruling tools, refers to a “standard (laws)” by which a ruler governs his people and an “administrative method” by which he controls ministers. There are two opposing arguments with regard to the source of law in Han Feizi’s view. The first group regard Han Feizi as a natural legal theorist because the law is founded on Dao (道); the second group state that Han Feizi’s theory of law is positive because the ultimate source of law comes from orders of a sovereignty. The second position, in particular, holds that Han Feizi’s theory of law is similar to that expressed in Huang di si jing while categorizing Han Fei as a Huang-Laoist or Dao-Faist. For the beginning of “Jing fa” of the Huang di si jing records that Dao gives birth to fa. This article will examine Han Feizi’s theory of law by analyzing chapters of “Zhu dao,” “Yang quan,” “Jie lao” and “Da ti” of his work with emphasis on the relationship between Dao and fa. In addition, it will also discuss whether it is convincing to consider Han Feizi as a Huang-Laoist.
Abstract
In Han Feizi’s thought, fa (法), one of the critical ruling tools, refers to a “standard (laws)” by which a ruler governs his people and an “administrative method” by which he controls ministers. There are two opposing arguments with regard to the source of law in Han Feizi’s view. The first group regard Han Feizi as a natural legal theorist because the law is founded on Dao (道); the second group state that Han Feizi’s theory of law is positive because the ultimate source of law comes from orders of a sovereignty. The second position, in particular, holds that Han Feizi’s theory of law is similar to that expressed in Huang di si jing while categorizing Han Fei as a Huang-Laoist or Dao-Faist. For the beginning of “Jing fa” of the Huang di si jing records that Dao gives birth to fa. This article will examine Han Feizi’s theory of law by analyzing chapters of “Zhu dao,” “Yang quan,” “Jie lao” and “Da ti” of his work with emphasis on the relationship between Dao and fa. In addition, it will also discuss whether it is convincing to consider Han Feizi as a Huang-Laoist.
참고문헌 (36)
- "郭店楚墓竹簡" (1998), 文物出版社
- "馬王堆漢墓帛書" (1974), 文物出版社
- "史記" (1982), 中華書局
- "藝文類聚" (1983), 臺灣商務印書館
- 陳奇猷, "韓非子新校注" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
- 이운구, "한비" (2002), 한길사
- 김갑수, "황로학에 대한 오해와 진실", 시대와 철학, 18 (1999), 철학사상연구회
- 김경수, "출토 문헌을 통해서 본 중국 고대 사상 - 마왕퇴 한묘 백서와 곽점 초묘 죽간을 중심으로 -" (2008), 심산출판사
- 김선민, "『黃帝四經』에 나타난 天道-人事 演繹의 특징", 중국고중세사연구, (19), pp.61~101 (2008), 중국고중세사학회
- 김성환, "黃老道探源" (2008), 中國社會科學
- 소공권, "중국고대정치사상사" (1998), 서울대학교출판부
- 이석명, "？해로(解老)？·？유로(喩老)？의 황로학적 성격과 그 사상사적 의미", 동양철학, 23(23), pp.151~174 (2005), 한국동양철학회
- 이석명, "黃老帛書의 刑名無爲정치론", 인문과학연구, 13 (2005), 강원대학교 인문과학연구소
- 이승환, "사회규범의 공공성에 관한 법가의 인식(2): 한비자(韓非子)의 ‘인·의’(仁·義) 비판에 대한 유가의 응답", 시대와 철학, 14(1), pp.46~67 (2003), 한국철학사상연구회
- 이춘식, "춘추전국시대의 법치사상과 세ㆍ술" (2002), 아카넷
- 정세근, "한비자의 노자 이해", 동서철학연구, (56), pp.195~214 (2010), 한국동서철학회
- 江龍海, "到應是黃老思想家", 北京大学学报, 1 (1989)
- 唐蘭, "馬王堆出土老子乙本卷前古佚書的研究", 考古学报, 1 (1975)
- 容肇祖, "韓非子考證" (1936), 商務印書館
- 鄭良樹, "韓非之著述及思想" (1993), 臺灣學生書局
- 丁原明, "黄老学論綱" (1997), 山东大学出版社
- 陳麗桂, "戰國時期的黄老思想" (1991), 聯經出版事業公司
- 木村英一, "法家思想の硏究" (1944), 弘文堂書房
- A. C. Graham, "도의 논쟁자들: 고대 중국 철학 논쟁" (1989), 새물결출판사
- Benjamin Schwartz, "중국고대사상의 세계" (1984), 살림
- Bertil Lundahl, "Han Fei Zi: The Man and the Work", Stockholm University, ~ (1992)
- Burton Watson, "Basic writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu" (1967), Columbia University Press
- H.L.A.Hart,The Concept of Law, "The Concept of Law" (1961), Oxford University Press
- Hsiao-po Wang, "The philosophical foundations of Han Fei’s political theory" (1986), University of Hawaii Press
- James B. Murphy, "The philosophy of positive law: foundations of jurisprudence" (2005), Yale University Press
- Jeffrie G. Murphy, "Philosophy of law: an introduction to jurisprudence" (1990), Westview Press
- Joseph Raz, "Authority, Law and Morality", The Monist, 68(3) (1985)
- Paul R. Goldin, "After Confucius: studies in early Chinese philosophy" (2005), University of Hawaii Press
- R. P. Peerenboom, "Law and Morality in Ancient China: the silk manuscripts of Huang-Lao" (1993), State University of New York Press
- Yuri Pines, "Lexical Changes in Zhanguo Texts", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 122(4) (2002)
- W. K. Liao, "The complete works of Han Fei tzŭ: a classic of Chinese legalism", London, A. Probsthain, ~ (1960)