러시아어 소사 “И”에 대해서
On the Russian Particle “И”
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
This paper has two goals. One is to propose an adequate hypothesis of the invariant meaning of the Russian particle “и” which seems to present a great polysemic functional variation. The other is to examine, through such a hypothesis, over-determination mechanisms of the combination between “и” and other particles. As the first goal, I propose the following hypothesis: (P) И Q = ‘a given term P - whether explicit or implicit - and the following Q belong to their common domain R, constituting a whole PQ; and in speaker's mind, if the relatedness of P to R is RP and that of Q to R is RQ, then RP ≥ RQ.’ From this, I can classify various occurrences of the particle “и” into the four types: i) RP = RQ with an explicit P, ii) RP = RQ with an implicit P, iii) RP > RQ with an explicit P, and iv) RP > RQ with an implicit P. As for the second goal of the paper, it reveals an interesting fact: in the process of combination between “и” and other particles, the distinction of RP = RQ and RP > RQ plays the decisive role because it determines the combinatory latitude of “и” toward other particles. The deictic or anaphoric particles can be semantically culminated only by the usage type of “и” within RP = RQ (roughly, “just” in English), but the additive ones only with the usage type of “и” within RP > RQ (roughly, “also, even”). And particles such as “только” can be determined by both the usage types of “и”, in so far as their contextual meanings are compatible with one usage type or with the other respectively.
Abstract
This paper has two goals. One is to propose an adequate hypothesis of the invariant meaning of the Russian particle “и” which seems to present a great polysemic functional variation. The other is to examine, through such a hypothesis, over-determination mechanisms of the combination between “и” and other particles. As the first goal, I propose the following hypothesis: (P) И Q = ‘a given term P - whether explicit or implicit - and the following Q belong to their common domain R, constituting a whole PQ; and in speaker's mind, if the relatedness of P to R is RP and that of Q to R is RQ, then RP ≥ RQ.’ From this, I can classify various occurrences of the particle “и” into the four types: i) RP = RQ with an explicit P, ii) RP = RQ with an implicit P, iii) RP > RQ with an explicit P, and iv) RP > RQ with an implicit P. As for the second goal of the paper, it reveals an interesting fact: in the process of combination between “и” and other particles, the distinction of RP = RQ and RP > RQ plays the decisive role because it determines the combinatory latitude of “и” toward other particles. The deictic or anaphoric particles can be semantically culminated only by the usage type of “и” within RP = RQ (roughly, “just” in English), but the additive ones only with the usage type of “и” within RP > RQ (roughly, “also, even”). And particles such as “только” can be determined by both the usage types of “и”, in so far as their contextual meanings are compatible with one usage type or with the other respectively.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김정일, "러시아어 수용표지 ну에 대하여", 러시아어문학연구논집, (35), pp.147~170 (2010), 한국러시아문학회
- 이기웅, "러시아어에 있어서 부정 생격의 논리-의미적 특성", 언어학, (21), pp.219~240 (1997)
- Апресян Ю. Д., "Типы информации для поверхностно-семантического ком-понента модели «Смысл ⇔ Текст»", Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 1 (1980)
- Битехтин А. Б., "Частицы -ТО, ЖЕ, ВЕДЬ и вводные конструкции ти-па КАК ИЗВЕСТНО как средства указания на известность пропоззицио-нального содержания предложения слушающему" (1994), Диссертация канд. филол. наук, МГУ
- Богуславский И. М., "Исследования по синтаксической семантике" (1985), Наука
- Богуславский И. М., "Сфера действия лексических единиц" (1996), Школа “языки русской культуры.”
- Борисова Е. Г., "Семантический анализ усилительных частиц русского языка" (1982), Наука
- Виноградов В. В., "Русский язык" (1947), Высшая школа
- Виноградов В. В., "Грамматика русского языка" (1952), Наука
- Евгенеьева А. П., "Словарь русского языка I-IV" (1981), Русский язык
- Караулов Ю. Н., "Русский язык ― Энциклопедия" (1997), Дрофа
- Крейдлин Г. Е., "Лексема даже", Семиотика и информатика, 6, pp.102~115 (1975)
- Николаева Т. М., "Семантика служебных слов" (1982), Пермск. ГУ
- Николаева Т. М., "Функции частицы в высказывании" (1985), Наука
- Ожегов С. И., "Словарь русского языка" (1989), Русский язык
- Шахматов А. А., "Синтакстс русского языка" (1941), Уч.-пед. изд
- Шведова Н. Ю., "Грамматика современного русского литератур-ного языка" (1970), Наука
- Шведова Н. Ю., "Русская грамматика" (1980), Наука
- Широкова Е. Г., "Часитца И и некоторые функции усилительных частиц, In Семантика служебных слов", pp.166~176 (1982), Пермск. ГУ
- Bonnot, Ch, "-To particule de rappel et de thématisation, In Les particules énociatives en russe contemporain, 2", pp.113~172 (1987), Institut d'Études Slaves
- de Groot, C., "Minor word class, In Morphologie, Bd.1", pp.820~831 (2000), W. de Gruyter
- Ducrot, O., "Les échelles argumentatives" (1980), Minuit
- Ducrot, O., "Le dire et le dit" (1984), Minuit
- Ducrot O, "Les mots du discours" (1980), Minuit
- König E., "The meaning of focus particles" (1991), Routledge
- Nikolaeva T. M., "Le "sémantisme implicite" des particules, In Les particules énociatives en russe contemporain 2", pp.39~50 (1987), Institut d'Études Slaves
- Padučeva E. V., "La particule že: sémantique, syntaxe, prosodie, In Les particules énociatives en russe contemporain 3", pp.11~44 (1988), Institut d'Études Slaves
- Paillard D., "conjonction et paticule, In Idem, 1", pp.153~195 (1986), Institut d'Études Slaves
- Paillard D, "Le partage du savoir ou l'ignorance n'est pas un argument A propos de la particule ved'", pp.89~123 (1986), Idem
- Paillard D, "Les particules énociatives en russe contemporain 1, 2, 3" (1986), Institut d'Études Slaves
- Parrot L. A., "Discourse organization and inferenece: the usage of the Russian particles že and ved", 박사, pp.1997
- Plungian V. A., "Signification de la particule že et jugement de probabilité, In Les particules énociatives en russe contemporain 3", pp.45~58 (1988), Institut d'Études Slaves
- Rathmayr R., "Die russischen Partikelen als Pragmalexeme" (1985), Otto Sagner
- Robins R. H., "A short history of linguistics" (1979), Longman
- Song E., "Discourse and style in Old Believer Lives: referential strategies and topic marking in the Lives of Avvakum, Epifanij, and Bojarynja Morozova", 박사, pp.1997
- Vasilyeva A. N., "Particles in colloquial Russian" (1993), Russky Yazyk
- Veyrenc J., "L'agrégat tak i en russe contemporain, In Les particules énociatives en russe contemporain 1", pp.13~51 (1986), Institut d'Études Slaves
- Zybatow L., "Was die Partikelen bedeuten" (1990), Otto Sagner