문화의 상호작용에 대한 문화기호학적 접근: 한국 비보이와 러시아 발레 뤼스를 중심으로
Cultural Semiotic Approach to Cultural Interaction: On Korean B-boying Culture and Russian Ballet Russes
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
It has been frequently indicated that the existing model for cultural interaction is not fully appropriate for explaining the (new) situation of cultural encounters and exchanges on the (whole) global level, the new trend usually called by "globalization". Increasingly problematic is the cultural imperialistic model supposing the relation between the West and the Third World as unilateral implantation and reception. The main problem is to devise an alternative model that can accommodate the rapidly changing conditions of cultural interaction, a model which understands the cultural interaction as reciprocity in communication instead of unilateral relationship. In this presentation the author attempts to demonstrate what useful insights we can draw from Yuri Lotman's thoughts on the mechanisms of cultural interaction, particularly his concepts on cultural translation that accompany creative transformation. Using these insights as a theoretical foundation, "B-boy" culture of contemporary Korea will be examined as a case study of intercultural communication, which will be compared with the "Ballet Russes," an international cultural phenomenon that grew out of Russian and French culture a century ago. Lotman's attempt to newly design a framework for the problems of cultural interaction, which can be summarized as "from influence to dialogue" is oriented to the following core question: how does the receiver in the context of cultural interaction internalize the message sent by the sender and become a sender itself? In other words, what enables the periphery to play the role of the center and what is the concrete, specific mechanism of "transformation" that occurs in the process? Lotman's theoretical frame, which emphasizes the interactivity of communication of cultures and the dynamic process of cultural translation, has the potential to become a new model for productive cultural hybridity that will take the place of the prevalent framework of 'cultural imperialism'.
Abstract
It has been frequently indicated that the existing model for cultural interaction is not fully appropriate for explaining the (new) situation of cultural encounters and exchanges on the (whole) global level, the new trend usually called by "globalization". Increasingly problematic is the cultural imperialistic model supposing the relation between the West and the Third World as unilateral implantation and reception. The main problem is to devise an alternative model that can accommodate the rapidly changing conditions of cultural interaction, a model which understands the cultural interaction as reciprocity in communication instead of unilateral relationship. In this presentation the author attempts to demonstrate what useful insights we can draw from Yuri Lotman's thoughts on the mechanisms of cultural interaction, particularly his concepts on cultural translation that accompany creative transformation. Using these insights as a theoretical foundation, "B-boy" culture of contemporary Korea will be examined as a case study of intercultural communication, which will be compared with the "Ballet Russes," an international cultural phenomenon that grew out of Russian and French culture a century ago. Lotman's attempt to newly design a framework for the problems of cultural interaction, which can be summarized as "from influence to dialogue" is oriented to the following core question: how does the receiver in the context of cultural interaction internalize the message sent by the sender and become a sender itself? In other words, what enables the periphery to play the role of the center and what is the concrete, specific mechanism of "transformation" that occurs in the process? Lotman's theoretical frame, which emphasizes the interactivity of communication of cultures and the dynamic process of cultural translation, has the potential to become a new model for productive cultural hybridity that will take the place of the prevalent framework of 'cultural imperialism'.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김수환, "로트만의 문화 기호학: 구조적 ‘대립’에서 비대칭적 ‘대화’로", 기호학 연구, 2(16), pp.101~145 (2004), 한국기호학회
- 김수환, "바흐친과 로트만: <대화>에 관한 대화 in: 기호, 텍스트 그리고 삶" (2005), 월인
- 김수환, "‘경계’ 개념에 대한 문화기호학적 접근 - 구별의 원리에서 교환의 메커니즘으로", 기호학 연구, 23, pp.489~514 (2008), 한국기호학회
- 김효근, "춤으로 세계를 제패하다, 대한민국 B-boy" (2006), 길벗
- 로트만, 유리, "기호계 - 문화연구와 문화기호학" (2008), 문학과지성사
- 바바, 호미, "문화의 위치" (2002), 소명출판
- 서일호, "<비사발: 시즌1>을 계기로 보는 한국 비보이들의 성공요인 그리고 비보잉 공연의 전망", 미르 (2007), 국립극장
- 싱클레어, 존, "문화제국주의를 탈중심화하기: 라틴 세계의 ‘텔레비사’와 ‘TV글로부’ in: 세계화 시대의 문화 논리" (2005), 한울
- 아파두라이, 아르준, "고삐풀린 현대성" (2004), 현실문화연구
- 은혜정, "남미의 드라마: 텔레노벨라의 분석과 전망", KBI 포커스, 7(3)통권 : 23 (2007), 한국방송영상산업 진흥원
- 윤지현, "한국 비보잉의 세계지역화 - '비보이를 사랑한 발레리나’를 중심으로", 대한무용학회 논문집, 48(48), pp.169~190 (2006), 대한무용학회
- 이성훈, "세계화와 텔레노벨라의 변화", 스페인어문학, (36), pp.481~496 (2005), 한국스페인어문학회
- 임지현, "해방에서 동원으로 in: 이념의 속살 - 억압과 해방의 경계에서" (2001), 삼인
- 조한혜정, "동", 서양 정체성의 해체와 재구성: 글로벌 지각 변동의 징후로 읽는 ‘한류열풍’, 2002, pp.35(1), 3~40[DOI]
- 톰린슨, 존, "문화제국주의" (1994), 나남출판
- 톰린슨, 존, "세계화와 문화" (2004), 도서출판 강
- 천 샤오메이, "옥시덴탈리즘" (2001), 도서출판 강
- Babha, Homi, "The Location of Culture" (1994), Routledge
- Banes, Sally, "Firebird and the Idea of Russianness in: The Ballets Russes and Its World" (1999), Yale Univ. Press
- "With Crews and Zoos, a B-Boy World. The New York Times"[URL]
- Figes, Orlando, "Natasha's Dance: A cultural History of Russia" (2003), Penguin Books
- Lotman, Yuri M., "Universe of Mind" (1990), Indiana University Press
- Schönle, Andreas, "The Self, Its Bubbles, and Its Illusions in: Lotman and Cultural Studies - Encounters and Extensions" (2006), The University of Wisconsin Press
- Wollen, Peter, "Reading the Icebox: Reflections on Twentieth-Century Culture" (1993), Verso
- Ким, Су Кван, "Основые аспекты творческой эволюции Ю. М. Лотмана" (2003), Н.Л.О.
- "Внутри мыслящих миров", pp.искусство, Семиосфера
- Лотман, Ю. М., "Проблема византийского влияния на русскую культуру в типологическом освещении in: История и типология русской культуры" (2002), искусство
