문화기호학과 폭발 - 로트만(Ю. Лотман)의 『문화와 폭발(Культура и взрыв)』을 중심으로
Cultural Semiotics and Explsion: Analysis of Ju. Lotman’s <Culture and Explosion>
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to analyze new aspects of Ju. Lotman’s late semiotic theory. In his latest work Culture and Explosion, Ju. Lotman introduces such new concepts as ‘explosion’ and ‘unpredictability.’ These new concepts make it possible to try a political interpretation of the theoretical systems of Ju. Lotman, who has generally been regarded apolitical so far. In his earlier works Ju. Lotman defines the structure of Russian culture as a dualism that lacks axiologically neutral spheres. Consequently, according to Ju. Lotman’s definition, Russian culture is likely to show maximalistic and polarized features. The realities of post-perestroika period led Ju. Lotman to think that the changes in Russia may bring forth catastrophic explosions owing to the binary structure of Russian culture. At the same time, however, these changes can also work as a chance for transition from Russian binary structure to Western-style ternary structure. In Culture and Explosion, Ju. Lotman tries to seek for a way to “explosion without catastrophe,” examining the possibility of such transition. This paper tries to concretize Ju. Lotman’s idea of “explosion without catastrophe,” by comparing cultural semiotics of Ju. Lotman with the theory of J. Rancière, which will allow us to reflect upon the theory of Ju. Lotman in the context of ‘liberation theory.’
Abstract
This paper attempts to analyze new aspects of Ju. Lotman’s late semiotic theory. In his latest work Culture and Explosion, Ju. Lotman introduces such new concepts as ‘explosion’ and ‘unpredictability.’ These new concepts make it possible to try a political interpretation of the theoretical systems of Ju. Lotman, who has generally been regarded apolitical so far. In his earlier works Ju. Lotman defines the structure of Russian culture as a dualism that lacks axiologically neutral spheres. Consequently, according to Ju. Lotman’s definition, Russian culture is likely to show maximalistic and polarized features. The realities of post-perestroika period led Ju. Lotman to think that the changes in Russia may bring forth catastrophic explosions owing to the binary structure of Russian culture. At the same time, however, these changes can also work as a chance for transition from Russian binary structure to Western-style ternary structure. In Culture and Explosion, Ju. Lotman tries to seek for a way to “explosion without catastrophe,” examining the possibility of such transition. This paper tries to concretize Ju. Lotman’s idea of “explosion without catastrophe,” by comparing cultural semiotics of Ju. Lotman with the theory of J. Rancière, which will allow us to reflect upon the theory of Ju. Lotman in the context of ‘liberation theory.’
참고문헌 (44)
- 송태욱, "일본정신의 기원- 언어, 국가, 대의제, 그리고 통화" (2003), 이매진
- 박유하, "일본근대문학의 기원" (1997), 민음사
- 고프, J.L., "연옥의 탄생" (2000), 민음사
- 김성호, "문학의 정치와 정치적 보편성", 크리티카, 4, pp.14~29 (2010)
- 김수환, "로트만 문화 기호학에 있어서 러시아역사철학적 전통의 문제", 러시아어문학연구논집, (15), pp.225~253 (2004), 한국러시아문학회
- 김수환, "로트만의 폭발. 사유하는 구조: 유리 로트만의 기호학 연구", pp.391~430 (2011), 문학과 지성사
- 김수환, "책에 따라 살기: 유리 로뜨만의 문화유형론과 ‘러시아’라는 유령에 대하여", 창작과 비평, (163), pp.385~407 (2014)
- 김수환, "문화와 폭발", pp.301~336 (2014), 아카넷
- 김희숙, "러시아 기호학의 이해", pp.97~105 (1993), 민음사
- 랑시에르, J., "감성의 분할" (2008), 도서출판b
- 랑시에르, J., "정치적인 것의 가장자리" (2008), 길
- 김수환, "기호계" (2008), 문학과지성사
- 김수환, "문화와 폭발" (2014), 아카넷
- 로트만, Ю., "러시아 기호학의 이해" (1993), 민음사
- 무페, C., "정치적인 것의 귀환" (2007), 후마니타스
- 변현태, "중세적 웃음의 이중적 의미론과 주점에의 예배의 희극성", 러시아 연구, 10(2), pp.107~132 (2000)
- 변현태, "아방가르드와 정치", 크리티카, 6, pp.74~103 (2013)
- 박진우, "호모 사케르 : 주권 권력과 벌거벗은 생명" (2008), 새물결
- Амелин, Г., "Школа ‘Языки русской культуры’", pp.45~53 (1998), Школа ‘Языки русской культуры’. С
- Бердяев, Н., "Судьба России" (1990), Философское общество СССР
- Бердяев, Н., "Русская идея" (2013), Berdjaev
- Гаспаров, Б., "Тартуская школа 1960-х годов. Московско-Тартускаясемиотическая школа", pp.57~69 (1998), Школа ‘Языки русской культуры’. С
- Гуревич, А., "Проблема средневековой народной культуры" (1981), Искусство
- Зарецкий, А., "Имя мифа", НЛО, 32(С), pp.367~390 (1998)
- Зенкин, С., "Бой с тенью Лотмана: Заметки о теории, 1", НЛО, 53(С), pp.340~347 (2002)
- Живов, В., "Разыскания в области истории и предыстории русскойкультуры" (2002), Языки славянской культуры
- "Московско-тартуская семиотика: ее достижения и ееограничения. НЛО. №. 98" (2009)[URL]
- Живов, В., "Метаморфозы античного язычества в истории русской культуры ХVII—ХVIII вв", pp.461~531 (2002), Языки славянской культуры. С
- "Тартуско-московская семиотическая школа: семиотическаямодель культуры / культурная модель семиотики. НЛО. №. 98" (2009)[URL]
- "К вопросу о приципе действия культурной периферии. НЛО. №. 115" (2012)[URL]
- "Один невозможный диалог вокруг семиотики: ЮлияКристева-Юрий Лотман. НЛО. №. 109" (2011)[URL]
- Лотман, Ю., "Культура как субъект и сама-себе объект. Семиосфера", pp.639~647 (2000), Искусство-СПБ. С
- Лотман, Ю., "История и типология русской культуры. СПб" (2002), Искусство-СПБ
- Лотман, Ю., "Культура и взрыв" (2012), Искусство-СПБ
- "Самоописание, диалог и периферия у позднегоЛотмана: некоторые основы для сопоставления с современнымполитическим мышлением. НЛО. № 115" (2012)[URL]
- Пятигорский, А., "Заметки из 90-х о семиотике 60-х годов. Московско-Тартуская семиотическая школа", pp.152~156 (1998), Школа ‘Языки русской культуры’. С
- Рансьер, Ж., "Разделляя чувственное" (2007), Издательство Европейского университета
- Смирнов, И., "О Древнерусской культуре, русской национальнойспецифике и логике истории" (1991), Wiener Slawistischer Almanach
- "Лотман и структурализм: опыт невозвращения. Вопросы литературы. № 3" (2008)[URL]
- Успенский, Б., "Крест и круг" (2006), Языки славянских культура
- "Взрывы непредсказуемы" (2007)[URL]
- "Взрыв как метафора культурного семиозиса. НЛО. № 115" (2012)[URL]
- Фокина, О., "Литературная история <Повести о бражнике> ипроблема народной книги" (1995), Новосиб. гос. ун-т
- Эберт, К., "Семиотика на распутье. Достижения и пределыдуалистической модели культуры Лотмана — Успенского" (2009), РОССПЭН