道學과 正學의 관점에서 본 대구권 성리학

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to understand the academic tradition of Neo-Confucianism in the Daegu area from the perspective of Do-hak(道學) and Jeong-hak(正學). In the tradition of Neo- Confucianism, Do-hak and Jeong-hak can be said to be a common concept. However, it reveals a discriminatory aspect in the specific development process. The school of Do-hak refers to a series of scholars who emphasized practice of Do(道) among the groups of the Sarim(士林) faction in the early Joseon Dynasty. For scholars of Do-hak, it is important to go into direct experience and become one with life. In other words, it emphasizes practice as life, not blind belief in teaching. On the other hand, Jeong-hak emphasizes academic legitimacy and purity by being faithful to Zhu Xi's worldview based on Li-hak(理學). From this point of view, an idea that does not conform to Zhu Xi's theoretical system cannot be Jeong-hak. In this article, I interpreted the thoughts of Jo Sik, Lee Hwang, and Jeong Gu and Jang Hyeon-gwang, the central figures of Neo-Confucianism in Daegu, from the perspective of Do-hak and Jeong-hak. In detail, several characteristics were set as ideological symbols of Do-hak, and how these traditions were revealed in the Neo-Confucianism of the Daegu area was specified. And as a request of the times, we examined how the atmosphere of Jeong-hak was formed in the intellectual society of Daegu during the Joseon Dynasty. Finally, the similarities between the academic style of Neo-Confucianism in the Daegu area, the academic style of Seonsan(Gumi) area, and the academic style of Nammyeong were examined. From this hypothetical point of view, the characteristics of Neo-Confucianism in the Daegu area can be found in the coexistence between Do-hak and Jeong-hak. Externally, Toegye's Jeong-hak is the mainstream, but internally, there was a continuous academic tradition of Do-hak.