미국헌법상 집회의 자유의 초기형성
The Early Development of Freedom of Assembly in the U.S. Constitution
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study deals with the early development of freedom of assembly in the United States. In keeping with the right of petition as it was guaranteed in the United Kingdom, freedom of assembly was widely permitted in the colonies of the Americas. Then, during the national foundation of the U.S. such freedom was codified into law by the First Amendment. Freedom of assembly primarily originated out of popular sovereignty in relation to the political system of republicanism. This was natural since the U.S. was founded as a nation without a monarch after its independence from the U.K. Because representatives of the people gathered together for the Constitutional Convention, assembly formally associated with popular sovereignty. Therefore, freedom of assembly, linked with the right to petition, had the characteristics of a right claiming to the government while it had the features of political rights, related to popular sovereignty. Freedom of assembly was understood in this manner during the twentieth century. Such freedom of assembly has developed through precedents set by the Supreme Court. The clearest examples are: United States vs. Cruikshank in 1876, where constitutional freedom of assembly was dealt with explicitly for the first time; DeJonge vs. Oregon in 1937, which presented general accounts about constitutional freedom of assembly along with the view that freedom of assembly, freedom of speech and freedom of the press all have common ground; and Hague vs. Committee for Industrial Organization in 1939, which paved the way for the public speech theory. Constitutional freedom of assembly in the U.S. is more than an ornament to the legal provisions for democracy. Rather, it plays a role of claiming freedom of association which heightens the effect of speech or assembly, and from which right to privacy is derived. The provisions on freedom of assembly generate freedom essential to a free and democratic system. In this light, the early development of freedom of assembly in the U.S. does not reflect simply a history of accepting the Constitution as well as a trend of provisions. As with other areas of the U.S. Constitution, by examining freedom of assembly, we can identify the history of constitutionalism of the U.S.
Abstract
This study deals with the early development of freedom of assembly in the United States. In keeping with the right of petition as it was guaranteed in the United Kingdom, freedom of assembly was widely permitted in the colonies of the Americas. Then, during the national foundation of the U.S. such freedom was codified into law by the First Amendment. Freedom of assembly primarily originated out of popular sovereignty in relation to the political system of republicanism. This was natural since the U.S. was founded as a nation without a monarch after its independence from the U.K. Because representatives of the people gathered together for the Constitutional Convention, assembly formally associated with popular sovereignty. Therefore, freedom of assembly, linked with the right to petition, had the characteristics of a right claiming to the government while it had the features of political rights, related to popular sovereignty. Freedom of assembly was understood in this manner during the twentieth century. Such freedom of assembly has developed through precedents set by the Supreme Court. The clearest examples are: United States vs. Cruikshank in 1876, where constitutional freedom of assembly was dealt with explicitly for the first time; DeJonge vs. Oregon in 1937, which presented general accounts about constitutional freedom of assembly along with the view that freedom of assembly, freedom of speech and freedom of the press all have common ground; and Hague vs. Committee for Industrial Organization in 1939, which paved the way for the public speech theory. Constitutional freedom of assembly in the U.S. is more than an ornament to the legal provisions for democracy. Rather, it plays a role of claiming freedom of association which heightens the effect of speech or assembly, and from which right to privacy is derived. The provisions on freedom of assembly generate freedom essential to a free and democratic system. In this light, the early development of freedom of assembly in the U.S. does not reflect simply a history of accepting the Constitution as well as a trend of provisions. As with other areas of the U.S. Constitution, by examining freedom of assembly, we can identify the history of constitutionalism of the U.S.
참고문헌 (45)
- 게오르그 옐리네크, "독일 기본권 이론의 이해" (2004), 법문사
- 김상겸, "미국의 미국헌법상집회의 자유에 관한연구", 미국헌법연구, 15(1), pp.75~96 (2004), 미국헌법학회
- 김승환, "결사의 자유", 헌법학연구 (2000), 한국헌법학회
- 김종서, "집회의 자유를 말한다. in: 씨알의 소리", 함석헌기념사업회, 통권 : 205 (2009)
- 김종철, "영국의 집회 및 시위의 자유 - 야간집회금지와의 관련성을 중심으로", 서강법학연구, 11(1), pp.67~84 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김효전, "헌법" (2009), 소화
- 아렌트, "혁명론" (2004), 한길사
- 안경환, "집회의 자유와 집시법" (2003), 사람생각
- 앙드레 모로아, "미국사" (1991), 기린원
- 앙드레 모로아, "영국사" (1991), 기린원
- 양 건, "집회ㆍ시위의 자유 : 미국ㆍ일본의 판례를 중심으로. in: 월간고시 통권제154호" (1986), 법학사
- 유길준, "서유견문 : 조선 지식인 유길준, 서양을 번역하다" (2004), 서해문집
- 이병규, "영국헌법의 본질과 특색", 동아법학, (48), pp.61~103 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이희훈, "집회의 자유와 집시법" (2009), 경인문화사
- 이희훈, "集會의 槪念에 대한 憲法的 考察", 헌법학연구, 12(5), pp.147~187 (2006), 한국헌법학회
- 장태영, "제21조 집회의 자유", 공익과 인권, 4(1) (2007), 서울대학교 BK21 법학연구단 공익인권법연구센터
- Jennings, Ivor, "마그나 카르타와 그 영향", 저스티스, 27(2) (1994), 한국법학원
- 한동훈, "프랑스법상 집회와 시위에 관한 소고", 법제연구, (35), pp.245~270 (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 韓 秀 雄, "集會의 自由와 ‘集會 및 示威에 관한 法律’ - 集會禁止場所規定에 대한 위헌성 판단을 겸하여 -", 저스티스, (77), pp.5~33 (2004), 한국법학원
- 홍성방, "기본권의 분류", 고시연구, 26(5)통권 : 302 (1999), 고시연구사
- Benedict, Michael Les, "The Blessings of Liberty : Concise History the Constitution of the United States" (1996), D. C. Health and Company
- Churchill, Robert H., "Gun Regulation, the Police Power, and the Right to Keep Arms in Early America: The Legal Context of the Second Amendment", Law & Hist. Rev., 25 (2007)
- Cole, David, "Hanging With the Wrong Crowd: Of Gangs, Terrorists, and the Right of Association", Sup. Ct. Rev. at, 227 (1999)
- Cole, David, "Agon at Agora: Creative Misreadings in the First Amendment Tradition", Yale L. J., 95, pp.857~894 (1986)
- Corwin, Edward S., "The Constitution and What it means" (1978), Princeton Univ Press
- Crawford, Stanley E., "The Erosion of the Noerr Pennington Immunity", Mary’s L.J., 13, pp.291~ (1981)
- Curtis, Michael Kent, "The 1859 Crisis over Hinton Helper’s Book The Impending Crisis: Slavery, Free Speech, and the Meaning of the First Section of the Fourteenth Amendment", Chi. Kent L. Rev., 68, pp.1113~ (1993)
- Eldredge, John, "Detainment of United States Citizens as Enemy Combatants under a Forth Amendment Historial Analysis", J. L. ＆ Soc. Challenge, 6, pp.19~24 (2004)
- Emerson, Thomas I., "Colonial Intentions and Current Realities of the First Amendment", U. Pa. L. Rev., 125, pp.737~ (1976)
- Fallon, Richard H., "The Dynamic Constitution : An Introduction to American Constitutional Law" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Farber, Daniel A., "A History of the American Constitution, West : 2edition" (2005)
- Galston, Miriam, "Taking Aristotle Seriously: Republican-Oriented Legal Theory and the Moral Foundation of Deliberative Democracy", Cal. L. Rev., 82, pp.331~339 (1994)
- Goldberger, David, "A Reconsideration of Cox v. New Hampshire: Can Demonstrators Be Required to Pay the Costs of Using America’s Public Forums?", Texas L. Rev., 62, pp.403~ (1983)
- Hamburger, Philip, "Religious Freedom in Philadelphia", Emory L. J., 54, pp.1603~1632 (2005)
- Howard McIlwain, Charles, "Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern" (1947), Cornell University Press
- Kennedy, Kirk A., "Reaffirming the Natural Law Jurisprudence of Justice Clarence Thomas", Regent U. L. Rev., 9, pp.33~ (1997)
- Kobach, Kris W., "May ‘We the People’ Speak? The Forgotten Role of Constituent Instructions in Amending the Constitution", U. Cal. Davis L. Rev., 33, pp.1~ (1999)
- Locke, John, "시민정부론" (1970), 연세대학교출판부
- McWhirter, Darien A., "Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly" (1994), Oryx Press
- Mazzone, Jason, "Freedom’s Associations", Wash. L. Rev., 77, pp.712~ (2002)
- Montesquieu, "법의 정신" (1963), 을유문화사
- Morris, Jennifer E., "Human Rights Violations during the Tiananmen square and the Precedents Obliging United States Response", Cardozo L. Rev., 13, pp.1375~ (1991)
- Russell, Margaret M., "Freedom of Assembly and Petition: The First Amendment, Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (Bill of Rights)" (2010), Prometheus Books
- Ville, M. J. C., "Constitutionalism and Separation of Powers" (1998), Indianapolis, Liberty Fund
- Worth, Kinvin, "Notes for a Comparative study of the Origins of Federalism in the United Stated and Canada", Ariz. J. Int’l ＆ Comp. L., 15, pp.93~ (1998)