본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

<漢書·藝文志> 賦分四種辨

A Discrimination of Four Parts Fu(賦) in Hanshu Yiwen Records(漢書藝文志)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In Hanshu Yiwen Records(漢書·藝文志), What caused Fu(賦) to be divided into four parts, the past researchers had being conjecture the reasons since Zhang Xuecheng(章學誠), the author of JiaoChou‐TongYi(校讎通義). Their studies should be worth to be appreciated, for the textual research on the writers and writing, and the discrimination of the four parts Fu. But there is still being some obvious mistakes too, such as taking a part for the whole and using backward induction’s method. After collected and studied the academic history, I put forward the following list views on the Fu(賦) of Hanshu Yiwen Records(漢書·藝文志). The first part was got more easily at first, since which was gathered from Wu(武帝) to Xuan emperor(宣帝) in advance. Liu Xiang(劉向) collated and recognized them, and his son, Liu Xing(劉歆) added some other authors. The following second part was emended by Liu Xing(劉歆), which contained authors mostly were retinues or courtiers, almost lived the same period with them. The third part was emended by Liu Xiang(劉向) and Liu Xing(劉歆), increased by Ban Gu(班固), the writer of Hanshu(漢書). It was consisted very complex, contained some different styles, maybe collected again on the before. The last part was gained in the last time, which seems to like selected works or some anthology.

Abstract

In Hanshu Yiwen Records(漢書·藝文志), What caused Fu(賦) to be divided into four parts, the past researchers had being conjecture the reasons since Zhang Xuecheng(章學誠), the author of JiaoChou‐TongYi(校讎通義). Their studies should be worth to be appreciated, for the textual research on the writers and writing, and the discrimination of the four parts Fu. But there is still being some obvious mistakes too, such as taking a part for the whole and using backward induction’s method. After collected and studied the academic history, I put forward the following list views on the Fu(賦) of Hanshu Yiwen Records(漢書·藝文志). The first part was got more easily at first, since which was gathered from Wu(武帝) to Xuan emperor(宣帝) in advance. Liu Xiang(劉向) collated and recognized them, and his son, Liu Xing(劉歆) added some other authors. The following second part was emended by Liu Xing(劉歆), which contained authors mostly were retinues or courtiers, almost lived the same period with them. The third part was emended by Liu Xiang(劉向) and Liu Xing(劉歆), increased by Ban Gu(班固), the writer of Hanshu(漢書). It was consisted very complex, contained some different styles, maybe collected again on the before. The last part was gained in the last time, which seems to like selected works or some anthology.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 章學誠, "校讎通義" (1956), 上海古籍出版社
  2. 周壽昌, "漢書注校補", 「續修四庫全書」本, ~
  3. 張惠言, "七十家賦鈔", 光緒23年重刻本, ~ (1897)
  4. 姚振宗, "漢書藝文志條理", 「二十五史補編」本, ~
  5. 孫德謙, "漢書藝文志舉例" (1989), 中華書局
  6. 劉師培, "劉申叔先生遺書" (1997), 江蘇古籍出版社
  7. 劉師培, "論文雜記" (1959), 人民文學出版社
  8. 龐俊, "國故論衡疏證" (2008), 中華書局
  9. 顧實, "漢書藝文志講疏" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
  10. 陳國慶, "漢書藝文志注釋彙編" (1983), 中華書局
  11. 張舜徽, "漢書藝文志通釋" (1990), 湖北教育出版社
  12. 傅榮賢, "「漢書·藝文志」研究源流考" (2007), 黃山書社
  13. 段淩辰, "漢志·詩賦略廣疏", 河南大學學報, 1(1) (1934)
  14. 永瑢等, "四庫全書總目" (1965), 中華書局
  15. 黃汝成, "日知錄集釋(全校本)" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
  16. 程千帆, "程千帆全集 第七卷" (2002), 河北教育出版社
  17. 岡村繁, "岡村繁全集 第一卷" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
  18. 深圳大學國學研究所, "中國文化與中國哲學" (1990), 三聯書店
  19. 湯炳正, "屈賦新探" (1984), 齊魯書社
  20. 馬積高, "歷代辭賦研究史料概述" (2001), 中華書局
  21. 王昆吾, "中國早期藝術與宗教" (1998), 東方出版社
  22. 俞紀東, "漢志·詩賦略 “揚雄賦”繹釋", 復旦大學學報, (3) (2002)
  23. 熊良智, "漢志·詩賦略 分類義例新論", 中州學刊, (3) (2002)
  24. 伏俊璉, "漢志·詩賦略 “賦”分四家說", 中華文史論叢, 76 (2003)
  25. 王連龍, "漢書藝文志古義考", 東北師大學報, (5) (2008)
  26. 吳光興, "關於 漢書·藝文志 “詩賦略”的分類及小序之有無的問題", 文史, 2 (2010)
  27. 喬松林, "30年來 漢書·藝文志 研究綜述", 南都學刊, (2) (2011)
  28. 郭洪濤, "漢書·藝文志 專題研究", 碩士, pp.2005
  29. 王曉慶, "漢書·藝文志 詩賦略文獻研究", 博士, pp.2009

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)