朝日 經學界의 風土와 注釋 樣相 比較 - "大學"을 중심으로 -

Abstract

The Sino-centrism that appears in the Chosun and Japanese intelligent system is one of the intellectual efforts to heal and overcome wounds received before the worldview of Ha-i(夏夷). Chosun and Japan each believed that their own country had accumulated a higher level of scholarship than China. The belief is a force that recognizes themselves as the center of the world, and makes their country the master of civilization. The overcoming and dismantling of Sino-centrism was done from within. Under the consciousness of this problem, this study compares the reality of the scholastic achievement on the study of Chinese Classics of Chosun and Japan. As the reality of self - esteem that the two countries have introduced. In that way, this study first looked at the climate and atmosphere of the academic community in the study of Chinese Classics, and compared the annotations to The Great Learning, on the three issues of 'reading', 'author', 'Myeongdeok(明德) and Shinmin(新民)'. In the Chosun, Neo-Confucianismthe was the main subject of the scholarship. It was centered on Seowon(書院). On the other hand, Japan has put forth their academic opinions in a free atmosphere and private school(私塾). The scholars of Chosun analyzed the logic of the Neo-Confucianismthe accurately and precisely. By this way, they have created their own philosophical debate. This enabled us to create a thesis that was not found in other countries and to establish a unique academic system. On the other hand, Japanese scholars first denied all previous achievements. And they built up a new system of their own learning. This could lead to the problem of waste of intelligence. However, the diverse and original achievements built on these critical freedoms were the forces that enriched Japanese academia. In short, the distinctive academic achievements of the Chosun and Japan were sufficient to be the basis of 'overcoming and dissolving Sino-centrism. The concrete progress of the process of 'overcoming and dissolving the Sino-centrism of the two countries based on the achievement is left as a future research task.