본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Multilevel Democratic Iterative Coordination: An Entry in the ‘Envisioning Socialism’ Models Competition

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

In recent decades various operational models of a socialist economy have beenput forward in the English-language literature. One of these ― MultilevelDemocratic Iterative Coordination (MDIC) ― attempts a synthesis of central anddecentral forms of organization, and also of quantitative and qualitative/politicalmodes of regulation. The MDIC model proposes an iterative planning system,unique roles for the central level, a sophisticated measure of enterpriseperformance, a reward function that rewards both ambitious planning andrealistic plan fulfillment, and progressive development of democratic andparticipatory qualities at all levels and in all regulation contexts. With an outlineof these features in tow, the model ― when compared to other approaches via a‘model of the models’ ― emerges as the one with the greatest capacity tosynthesize the important insights of the others. It also captures the potential thatwas inherent in the Soviet system, but was thwarted due to authoritarian andrepressive distortions. The MDIC model, then, is also a call for recuperation ofthe positive elements in the Soviet experience; for embodying, critically, theachievements of the socialism of the 20th century in the project of developingvisions of socialism for the 21st.

Abstract

In recent decades various operational models of a socialist economy have beenput forward in the English-language literature. One of these ― MultilevelDemocratic Iterative Coordination (MDIC) ― attempts a synthesis of central anddecentral forms of organization, and also of quantitative and qualitative/politicalmodes of regulation. The MDIC model proposes an iterative planning system,unique roles for the central level, a sophisticated measure of enterpriseperformance, a reward function that rewards both ambitious planning andrealistic plan fulfillment, and progressive development of democratic andparticipatory qualities at all levels and in all regulation contexts. With an outlineof these features in tow, the model ― when compared to other approaches via a‘model of the models’ ― emerges as the one with the greatest capacity tosynthesize the important insights of the others. It also captures the potential thatwas inherent in the Soviet system, but was thwarted due to authoritarian andrepressive distortions. The MDIC model, then, is also a call for recuperation ofthe positive elements in the Soviet experience; for embodying, critically, theachievements of the socialism of the 20th century in the project of developingvisions of socialism for the 21st.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Albert, Michael, "The Political Economy of Participatory Economics" (1991), Princeton University Press
  2. Albert, Michael, "In Defense of Participatory Economics", Science & Society, 66(1), pp.7~21 (2002)
  3. Campbell, Donald, "Incentives: Motivation and the Economics of Information" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  4. Cockshott, Paul, "Towards a New Socialism" (1993), Spokesman Books
  5. Cockshott, Paul, "The Relation Between Economic and Political Instances in the Communist Mode of Production", Science & Society, 66(1), pp.50~64 (2002)
  6. Cockshott, Paul, "Discussion participant, Special Issue, “Designing Socialism: Visions, Projections, Models”", Science & Society, 76(2) (2012)
  7. Devine, Pat, "Democracy and Economic Planning" (1988), Polity Press; Westview Press
  8. Devine, Pat, "Participatory Planning Through Negotiated Coordination", Science & Society, 66(1), pp.72~85 (2002)
  9. Devine, Pat, "Discussion participant, Special Issue, “Designing Socialism: Visions, Projections, Models”", Science & Society, 76(2) (2012)
  10. Ellman, Michael, "Planning Problems in the USSR" (1973), Cambridge University Press
  11. Ellman, Michael, "Socialist Planning" (1979), Cambridge University Press
  12. Hahnel, Robin, "Discussion participant, Special Issue, “Designing Socialism: Visions, Projections, Models”", Science & Society, 76(2) (2012)
  13. Hahnel, Robin, "Of the People, By the People: The Case for a Participatory Economy", pp.2012, Soapbox Press
  14. Hahnel, Robin, "Response to David Laibman’s ‘Appraisal of the Participatory Economy’", Science & Society, 78(3), pp.379~389 (2014)
  15. Hayek, Friedrich A., "The Road to Serfdom" (1944), University of Chicago Press
  16. Hayek, Friedrich A., "The Price System as a Mechanism for Using Knowledge", American Economic Review, 35(4), pp.519~530 (1945)
  17. Hurwicz, Leonid, "Decision and Organization", pp.297~336 (1972), North-Holland
  18. Jablonowski, Mark, "Markets on a (Computer) Chip? New Perspectives on Economic Calculation", Science & Society, 75(3), pp.400~418 (2011)
  19. Kantorovich, L. V., "The Best Use of Economic Resources" (1965), Harvard University Press
  20. Keeran, Roger, "Socialism Betrayed: Behind the Soviet Collapse" (2004), International Publishers
  21. Khudokormov, G. N., "Political Economy of Socialism" (1967), Progress Publishers
  22. Laibman, David, "Value, Technical Change and Crisis: Explorations in Marxist Economic Theory" (1992), M. E. Sharpe
  23. Laibman, David, "Contours of the Maturing Socialist Economy", Historical Materialism, 9, pp.85~110 (2001)
  24. Laibman, David, "Democratic Coordination: Towards a Working Socialism for the New Century", Science & Society, 66(1), pp.116~129 (2002)
  25. Laibman, David, "The Soviet Demise: Revisionist Betrayal, Structural Defect, or Authoritarian Distortion?", Science & Society, 69(4), pp.594~606 (2005)
  26. Laibman, David, "Deep History: A Study in Social Development and Human Potential" (2007), State University of New York Press
  27. Laibman, David, "Incentive Design, Iterative Planning, and Local Knowledge in a Maturing Socialist Economy", International Critical Thought, 1(1), pp.1~22 (2011)
  28. Laibman, David, "Political Economy After Economics: Scientific Method and Radical Imagination" (2012), Routledge
  29. Laibman, David, "Discussion participant, Special Issue, “Designing Socialism: Visions, Projections, Models”", Science & Society, 76(2) (2012)
  30. Laibman, David, "Horizontalism and Idealism in Socialist Imagination: An Appraisal of the Participatory Economy", Science & Society, 78(2), pp.207~234 (2014)
  31. Laibman, David, "The Participatory Economy: A Preliminary Rejoinder", Science & Society, 78(4), pp.513~520 (2014)
  32. Lange, Oscar, "On the Economic Theory of Socialism" (1938), University of Minnesota Press
  33. Lazou, George Yeats, "Wikibudgeting", URPE Newsletter, (Summer), pp.10~13 (2014)
  34. Nove, Alec, "The Economics of Feasible Socialism" (1983), Allen & Unwin
  35. Pickersgill, Gary M., "Contemporary Economic Systems: A Comparative View" (1974), Prentice-Hall
  36. Roemer, John, "A Future for Socialism" (1994), Harvard University Press
  37. Schweickart, David, "Against Capitalism" (1996), Westview Press
  38. Weisskopf, Thomas, "Toward a Socialism for the Future, in the Wake of the Demise of the Socialism of the Past", Review of Radical Political Economics, 24(Fall, pp.Winter) (1992), 1~28
  39. Yang, Jinhai, "The Historical Significance of the Combination of Socialism and the Market Economy", Science & Society, 73(2), pp.170~176 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)