艮齋 田愚(1841~1922) 漢詩의 주석 양상 – 새 자료 『詩稿』를 중심으로

Abstract

Gan-Jae Jeon-u (1841-1922), a scholar and writer active from the late 19th to the early 20th century, is revered as one of the prominent intellectuals of the era, given the extensive volume of his literary works and the significant number of students he mentored. However, despite extensive discussions on Gan-Jae's classical studies and philosophy, his literary research remains relatively scarce. Particularly, there has been little analysis conducted on his Chinese poetry. His poetry not only expresses personal emotions but also encapsulates his thoughts on Daoism and the tumultuous world around him. Thus, his poetry serves as supplementary material that directly reveals his ideologies. Moreover, numerous unpublished drafts of his poetry have been discovered in his collected works, indicating the necessity for more active research in this area. In the Shi-go collection at the KYUJANGGAK INSTITUTE FOR KOREAN STUDIES, there are poems that are not found in the three versions of Gan-Jae's anthologies (the Yongdong version, Jinju version, Hwa-Do Su-Jeong version). Among them, there are also poems that are not present in the separate book, GuSan-SeonSaeng-PungaA(臼山先生風雅). When comparing the poems found in the anthologies with those in GuSan-SeonSaeng-PungaA, Shi-go is considered to be a literary source of GuSan-SeonSaeng-PungaA. Furthermore, a notable characteristic of Shi-go is the abundance of annotated poems. Gan-Jae's utilization of annotation in Chinese poetry can be broadly categorized into two main aspects. Firstly, there are instances where the source of the annotation is explicitly stated, whether it be from another individual's commentary or from a book. Secondly, there are cases where the source of the annotation is not disclosed. In the latter scenario, it can further be divided into cases where the annotation directly utilizes the original source and cases where the annotation modifies the original source. Gan-Jae's poetry, including Shi-go, often uses the annotation to reveal the source of the poem. Despite records in Shi-go indicating certain Chinese poetry should be included, they are absent from currently published anthologies. This raises questions about the criteria Gan-Jae used for including Chinese poetry in his anthologies. Considering Gan-Jae's background as a scholar rather than a poet, it's worth considering whether he intentionally included fewer Chinese poetry than originally intended. Researchers should not overlook the fact that there are more Chinese poetry in the form of separate books of Gan-Jae's anthologies than those found within his collected works.