『주역(周易)』 금고문(今古文) 연구 서설

Abstract

This study is meaningful in that it presents a research methodology and research task for the study of the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文), which has not yet been studied in our academic world. This study presented the double evidence method of Unearthed literature and ground literature as a research methodology. Research through this double evidence method is expected to contribute to the scientific methodology in the study of Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文) in the future. In addition, this paper is meaningful in that it presented the following important tasks in the study of the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文). First of all, the significance of this paper can be found in that there have been no prior studies dealing with the issue of the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文) through the Unearthed literature in our academic world. There is no prior research on the issue of the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文) of chinese history of Yixue(易學) in our academic world, and furthermore, there seems to be no further research on the issue of the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文) through the Unearthed literature. Second, until now, there seems to be no prior research on the Feishiguyidingwen(費氏古易訂文) written by Wang Shunan(王樹枏) of the Qing Dynasty as well as in Chinese academia. The cause of this can be found because interest in the BC station is still almost insignificant, but in fact, this paper is thought to have presented a very important task in that the most important problem in the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文) is Feishiyi(費氏易). In addition, the significance of this paper can be found in that it suggested the necessity of research on the Feishiguyidingwen(費氏古易訂文) of Wang Shunan(王樹枏). Third, in the study of Zhouyi’s variant text, this paper is considered to be significant in that there have been few studies on the Yijingyiwenshi(易經異文釋) written by Li Fusun(李富孫) of the Qing Dynasty, a representative work of the study of Zhouyi’s variant text. Furthermore, this paper is considered to have presented a new task in the study of Zhouyi’s variant text, one of the most difficult fields in the study of Zhouyi, in that it presented the task of an integrated approach to ground and underground literature by studying the Zhouyi’s variant text based on the Unearthed literature. Fourth, in relation to the study of the Qing Dynasty’s Jinwen-Jingxue(今文經學), another important field in the issue of the Zhouyi’s Jinguwen(今古文), it proposes the necessity of studying Yijingjinwenkao(易經今文考) written by Lee ByungHun(李炳憲). In particular, it was suggested that it is necessary to critically review Lee ByungHun(李炳憲)’s Yijingjinwenkao(易經今文考) through the Unearthed literature.