본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Japan Debates the Korean Peninsula: Implications for Future Policy and U.S.-Japan Relations

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Japan’s debate about South and North Korea grew livelier in 20072008. As the strategic environment changed, right-wing opposition to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda’s supposed ‘‘Asianism’’ and center/left renewed hope for regional reconciliation produced a sharp exchange centering on the Korean peninsula, in which the U.S. figured importantly. Anxieties about national identity deeply rooted in history were compounded by the triple shock of the U.S. delisting the North as a terror-sponsoring state, the U.S.-caused global financial crisis, and Barack Obama’s election victory. Troubled by George W. Bush’s second-term foreign policy shifts, many Japanese people were unprepared for a new president more sympathetic to multilateralism. On North Korea, conservatives warned that U.S. policy was isolating Japan, but instead of refocusing on broad national interests, they pointed to the abductions issue as justification for a more independent foreign policy. On South Korea they welcomed the election of Lee Myung-bak, but that did not stand in the way of renewed stress on the territorial dispute at the expense of strategic thinking. Above all, ultra-conservatives cast doubt on U.S.Japanese relations without adequate resistance from others who articulated the rationale and values behind U.S. policies. As they awaited Obama’s initiatives, the Japanese were alert to Korea’s importance for a region in flux, but they were too absorbed in their own narrow agenda to prepare for a strategic response.

Abstract

Japan’s debate about South and North Korea grew livelier in 20072008. As the strategic environment changed, right-wing opposition to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda’s supposed ‘‘Asianism’’ and center/left renewed hope for regional reconciliation produced a sharp exchange centering on the Korean peninsula, in which the U.S. figured importantly. Anxieties about national identity deeply rooted in history were compounded by the triple shock of the U.S. delisting the North as a terror-sponsoring state, the U.S.-caused global financial crisis, and Barack Obama’s election victory. Troubled by George W. Bush’s second-term foreign policy shifts, many Japanese people were unprepared for a new president more sympathetic to multilateralism. On North Korea, conservatives warned that U.S. policy was isolating Japan, but instead of refocusing on broad national interests, they pointed to the abductions issue as justification for a more independent foreign policy. On South Korea they welcomed the election of Lee Myung-bak, but that did not stand in the way of renewed stress on the territorial dispute at the expense of strategic thinking. Above all, ultra-conservatives cast doubt on U.S.Japanese relations without adequate resistance from others who articulated the rationale and values behind U.S. policies. As they awaited Obama’s initiatives, the Japanese were alert to Korea’s importance for a region in flux, but they were too absorbed in their own narrow agenda to prepare for a strategic response.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Gilbert Rozman, "Japan and South Korea: Should the U.S. Be Worried about their New Spat in 2001?", Pacific Review, 15(1), pp.1~28 (2002)
  2. Gilbert Rozman, "Japanese Strategic Thought toward Asia" (2007), Palgrave
  3. Gilbert Rozman, "Internationalism and Asianism in Japanese Strategic Thought from Meiji to Heisei", Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9(2), pp.209~232 (2008)
  4. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, "East Asia’s Haunted Present: Historical Memories and the Resurgence of Nationalism" (2008), Praeger
  5. Gilbert Rozman, "Japan’s Images of China in the 1990s: Are they Ready for China’s ‘Smile Diplomacy’ or Bush’s ‘Strong Diplomacy?", Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2(1), pp.97~125 (2001)
  6. Gilbert Rozman, "A Chance for a Breakthrough in Russo- Japanese Relations: Will the Logic of Great Power Relations Prevail?", Pacific Review, 15(3), pp.325~357 (2002)
  7. Gilbert Rozman, "The United States and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Views from China, Japan, Russia, and South Korea, In Asia Eyes America: Regional Perspectives on U.S.-Asia Pacific Strategy in the 21st Century", pp.63~90 (2007), Naval War College Press
  8. Gilbert Rozman, "Sino-Japanese Competition over the Korean Peninsula: The Nuclear Crisis as a Turning Point, In Korea: The East Asian Pivot", pp.287~306 (2006), Naval War College Press
  9. Gilbert Rozman, "South Korea and the Sino-Japanese Rivalry: A Middle Power’s Options within the East Asian Core Triangle", Pacific Review, 20(2), pp.197~220 (2007)
  10. "Koritsusuru Nihon", Chuo koron, November 2007, 43~ (2007)
  11. "Sankei Shimbun, June 25, 2008", 1~ (2008)
  12. "Yomiuri Shimbun, June 27, 2008", 3~ (2008)
  13. "Yomiuri Shimbun, June 27, 2008", 7~ (2008)
  14. Yoichi Funabashi, "The Peninsula Question: A Chronicle of the Second Korean Nuclear Crisis" (2007), The Brookings Institution
  15. "Tai Kitachosen imakoso taiwa ni ugoku toki", Sekai, (7) (2008)
  16. Tanino Sakutaro, "Fukuda Ajia gaiko’ o kangaeru", Gaiko Forum, (4), pp.86~91 (2008)
  17. "Yomiuri Shimbun, June 27, 2008, 2", ~ (2008)
  18. "Sankei Shimbun, June 26, 2008, 2", ~ (2008)
  19. "Asahi Shimbun, October 1, 2008, 4", ~ (2008)
  20. "Sankei Shimbun, July 24, 2008, 5", ~ (2008)
  21. "Sankei Shimbun, July 19, 2008, 6", ~ (2008)
  22. "Yomiuri Shimbun, July 24, 2008, 3", ~ (2008)
  23. "Mainichi Shimbun, July 24, 2008, 3", ~ (2008)
  24. Yukiko Fukagawa, "Lee Myung-bak wa Kankoku keizai no ‘mujun’ o kaishodekiruka?’", Foresight, pp.68~69 (2008)
  25. "Sankei Shimbun, July 13, 2008, 2", ~ (2008)
  26. "Yomiuri Shimbun, July 15, 2008, 2 and 3", ~ (2008)
  27. "Sankei Shimbun, July 22, 2008, 7", ~ (2008)
  28. "Sankei Shimbun, August 4, 2008, 10", ~ (2008)
  29. "Nihon Keizai Shimbun, July 21, 2008, 17", ~ (2008)
  30. "Asahi Shimbun, July 21, 2008, 7", ~ (2008)
  31. "Nihon keizai Shimbun, August 26, 2008, 3", ~ (2008)
  32. "Sankei Shimbun, August 23, 2008, 5", ~ (2008)
  33. "Asahi Shimbun, October 1, 2008, 6", ~ (2008)
  34. "Asahi Shimbun, August 18, 2008, 7", ~ (2008)
  35. "Asahi Shimbun, July 15, 2008, 3", ~ (2008)
  36. "Asahi Shimbun, August 11, 2008, 3", ~ (2008)
  37. "Sankei Shimbun, July 31, 2008, 7", ~ (2008)
  38. "Sankei Shimbun, August 22, 1008, 7", ~
  39. "Sankei Shimbun, August 1, 2008, 3", ~ (2008)
  40. "Sankei Shimbun, July 7, 2008, 11", ~ (2008)
  41. "Asahi Shimbun, August 23, 2008, 1 and 11", ~ (2008)
  42. "Nihon Keizai Shimbun, August 15, 2008, 23", ~ (2008)
  43. "Nihon keizai Shimbun, August 16, 2008, 2", ~ (2008)
  44. "Asahi Shimbun, September 2, 2008, 2", ~ (2008)
  45. "Sankei Shimbun, September 1, 2008, 12", ~ (2008)
  46. "Sankei Shimbun, July 16, 2008, 5", ~ (2008)
  47. Jonathan D. Pollack, "‘The Korean Peninsula in U.S. Strategy: Policy Issues for the Next President, In Strategic Asia: Challenges and Choices", pp.136~143 (2008), The National Bureau of Asian Research
  48. Jonathan D. Pollack, "The Korean Peninsula in U.S. Strategy: Policy Issues for the Next President, In Strategic Asia: Challenges and Choices", pp.161~ (2008), The National Bureau of Asian Research
  49. Michael J. Green, "Japan’s Reluctant Realism: Foreign Policy Challenges in an Era of Uncertain Power" (2001), Palgrave
  50. Richard J. Samuels, "Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia" (2007), Cornell University Press
  51. T. J. Pempel, "Japan: Divided Government, Diminished Resources, In Strategic Asia: Challenges and Choices", pp.130~133 (2008), The National Bureau of Asian Research

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)