본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

갑골문 東夷 관련 기록과 先秦 문헌상의 ‘九黎’ 등을 통해 살핀 ‘高句麗’ 명칭의 문화적 내면

A Study on the Cultural Meaning of the Name ‘Koguryo(高句麗)', based on ‘Dongyi(東夷)' in the Oracle-Bone Inscriptions and ‘Kuryo(九黎)' in the Pre-Qin Documents

김경일
한국중국언어문화연구회 (Korean Society of Study on Chinese Languge and Culture)|2009.02|한중언어문화연구 (The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China)|제19호|pp. 1-27|DOI 10.16874/jslckc.2009..19.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

명칭甲骨文Oracle-Bone InscriptionsCultural meaningDongshi-东尸Kuyi-九夷Kuryo-九黎Koguryo-高句麗Pre-Qin Documents'东尸''九夷''九黎''高句麗'文化적 의미
주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Central to this paper is a hypothesis that 'Kuryo(句麗)' the core part of name 'Kokuryo(高句麗)' is derived from the name 'Kuyi(九夷)' which means nine kinds of Yi(夷) tribes. In a previous article 'A Study on the Word 'Dongshi(東尸)', the Origin of the Name 'Dongyi(東夷)' in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions of the Yin Dynasty', I proved that the name 'Dongshi(東尸)' in Yin Oracle Bone Inscriptions was the origin of 'Dongyi(東夷)‘. In another previous article 'A Study on relation of 'JiuWu(九巫)' of the Oracle Bone Inscriptions and 'JiuYi(九夷)' of the "ZhuShuJiNian(竹書紀年)"etc.', I also verified that the 'Dongyi(東夷)' was sometimes called 'Kuyi(九夷)' which meant 'Yi(夷)' consisted of nine kinds of tribes. This record reveals the possibility that the 'Dongyi(東夷)' also consisted of nine tribes. In this context, I argue that 'Kuryo(句麗)', the core part of name 'Kokuryo(高句麗)' was originated from 'Kuyi(九夷)'. To prove the phonetic relationship between 'Kuryo(句麗)' and 'Kuyi(九夷)', this paper conforms that the initial of 'Ku(句)' and the initial of 'Ku(九)' have same reconstructed consonant *k-, so 'Ku(句)' of 'Kuryo(句麗)' and 'Ku(九)' of 'Kuyi(九夷)' can be converted due to the phonetic loan phenomenon 'Jiajie(假借)'. In rhyme field, 'Ku(句)' and 'Ku(九)' also can be exchanged because of same final, same main vowel. As for 'Yi(夷)' and 'Ryo(麗)' two characters also can be exchanged because not only are their initials close but their finals belong to same rhyme group.

Abstract

Central to this paper is a hypothesis that 'Kuryo(句麗)' the core part of name 'Kokuryo(高句麗)' is derived from the name 'Kuyi(九夷)' which means nine kinds of Yi(夷) tribes. In a previous article 'A Study on the Word 'Dongshi(東尸)', the Origin of the Name 'Dongyi(東夷)' in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions of the Yin Dynasty', I proved that the name 'Dongshi(東尸)' in Yin Oracle Bone Inscriptions was the origin of 'Dongyi(東夷)‘. In another previous article 'A Study on relation of 'JiuWu(九巫)' of the Oracle Bone Inscriptions and 'JiuYi(九夷)' of the "ZhuShuJiNian(竹書紀年)"etc.', I also verified that the 'Dongyi(東夷)' was sometimes called 'Kuyi(九夷)' which meant 'Yi(夷)' consisted of nine kinds of tribes. This record reveals the possibility that the 'Dongyi(東夷)' also consisted of nine tribes. In this context, I argue that 'Kuryo(句麗)', the core part of name 'Kokuryo(高句麗)' was originated from 'Kuyi(九夷)'. To prove the phonetic relationship between 'Kuryo(句麗)' and 'Kuyi(九夷)', this paper conforms that the initial of 'Ku(句)' and the initial of 'Ku(九)' have same reconstructed consonant *k-, so 'Ku(句)' of 'Kuryo(句麗)' and 'Ku(九)' of 'Kuyi(九夷)' can be converted due to the phonetic loan phenomenon 'Jiajie(假借)'. In rhyme field, 'Ku(句)' and 'Ku(九)' also can be exchanged because of same final, same main vowel. As for 'Yi(夷)' and 'Ryo(麗)' two characters also can be exchanged because not only are their initials close but their finals belong to same rhyme group.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 本书编写组, "金文今译类检" (2003), 广西教育出版社
  2. 陳彭年, "廣韻" (1981), 黎明文化事業公司
  3. 郭沫若, "两周金文辞大系图录考释" (1999), 上海书店
  4. 郭沫若, "殷周青铜铭文研究" (1954), 人民出版社
  5. 郭沫若, "金文丛考" (1952), 人民出版社
  6. 何林仪, "战国文字通论" (1989), 中华书局
  7. 胡厚宣, "甲骨學商史論叢初集:上․下" (2002), 河北敎育出版社
  8. 黃天樹, "殷虛王卜辭的分類與斷代", 박사, pp.1991
  9. 劉堯漢, "中國文明源頭新探" (1993), 雲南人民出版社
  10. 李方桂, "上古音硏究" (1980), 商務印書館
  11. 李孝定, "甲骨文字集釋" (1982), 中央硏究院 歷史語言硏究所
  12. 李珍華, "漢字古今音表" (1993), 中華書局
  13. 马承源, "商周青铜器铭文选" (1988), 文物出版社
  14. 饒宗頤, "甲骨文通檢" (1995), 中文大學
  15. 容庚, "金文编" (1999), 中华书局
  16. 唐兰, "西周青铜器铭文分代史徵" (1986), 人民出版社
  17. 王力, "漢語語音史" (1985), 社會科學院出版社
  18. 王力, "上古音 in: 王力文集" (1989), 山東敎育出版社
  19. 夏商周斷代工程專家組, "夏商周斷代工程1996-2000年階段成果報告" (2000), 世界圖書出版
  20. 姚孝遂, "小屯南地甲骨考釋" (1985), 中華書局
  21. 姚孝遂, "殷墟甲骨刻辭類纂" (1989), 中華書局
  22. 姚孝遂, "殷虛甲骨刻辭摹釋總集" (1988), 吉林大學古籍硏究所叢刊之五
  23. 于省吾, "甲骨文字詁林" (1996), 中華書局
  24. 张世超, "金文形义通解" (1996), 中文出版社
  25. 周法高, "金文诂林" (1974), 香港中文大学
  26. 中國社會科學院 考古硏究所, "殷周金文集成" (1995), 中華書局
  27. 中國社會科學院 考古硏究所, "小屯南地甲骨" (1983), 中華書局
  28. 강선, "高句麗와 北方民族의 관계 연구", 박사, 사학과, pp.2003
  29. 김유철, "中國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 國家的 正體性", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.13~56 (2004), 고구려발해학회
  30. 박경철, "濊貊夫餘와 高句麗의 正體性에 關한 硏究", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.497~532 (2004), 고구려발해학회
  31. 박성봉, "韓國의 硏究史를 通해서 본 高句麗 正體性 問題", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.193~226 (2004), 고구려발해학회
  32. 박원길, "高句麗와 柔然·突厥의 관계", 고구려발해연구, 14 (2002), 고구려발해학회
  33. 박준호, "『三國史記』 러시아어 飜譯本과 高句麗 整體性", 고구려연구, 18, pp.183~191 (2004)
  34. 서영대, "韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의正體性", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.85~100 (2004), 고구려발해학회
  35. 孫進己, "高句麗考古硏究綜述", 고구려연구, 12, pp.111~193 (2001)
  36. 윤명철, "고구려의 고조선 계승성에 관한 연구 1", 고구려발해연구, 13, pp.4~ (2002), 고구려발해학회
  37. 이성제, "北韓의 高句麗史 硏究와 歷史 認識", 고구려연구, 18, pp.227~247 (2004)
  38. 이원배, "高句麗 ‘東明’ 王號의 成立過程과 性格", 석사, 사학과, pp.2006
  39. 이인영, "고구려지명 지명어미에 대하여", 일본연구, (27), pp.163~181 (2006), 일본연구소
  40. 임기환, "고구려본기 전거 자료의 계통과 성격", 한국고대사연구, (42), pp.21~78 (2006), 한국고대사학회
  41. 최남희, "고구려 지명에 반영된 고구려 한자음과 어휘 고찰", 새얼 語文論集, 16, pp.207~238 (2004)
  42. 최중호, "고구려말의 어음", 어, 동남어문논집, pp.2006, 21[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

商代 갑골문에 보이는 ‘東+某’ 어휘 연구 - 東夷 관련 고문자 텍스트 DB 구축 과정의 일환 -김경일한국중국언어문화연구회 · 한중언어문화연구2012 · 제28호高句麗 王稱語 小考김상윤어문연구학회 · 어문연구2009 · 제59권 高句麗의 種族 起源에 대한 일고찰 ― 夫餘別種說과 貊族說의 정합적 이해를 중심으로 ―여호규수선사학회 · 사림2011 · 제38호國號 ‘高句麗’의 語義에 대한 일고찰金相潤한국어문교육연구회 · 어문연구(語文硏究)2007 · 제35권 제1호‘高句麗’와 ‘高麗’의 소릿값(音價)에 관한 연구서길수고구려발해학회 · 고구려발해연구2007 · 제27권 商代 東夷 열국과 문화김연주고조선단군학회 · 고조선단군학2012 · 제26권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)

语言变异的本土化 ——以包头昆都仑区鼻韵尾变异为例서대명, 류영pp. 28-39韓國略字與簡化字的對比硏究試探 --以形成規律與字形爲中心류동춘pp. 40-54汉韩‘给予’类双宾相关的句式对比김종호pp. 55-67韩汉熟语对比研究小考김명화pp. 55-65韩国语“좀(jom)” 和汉语“一下（儿）、一点（儿）、有点儿” -句法、语义、语用对比이은경pp. 68-82
원문 보기