The Birth and Revival of North Korea’s Denuclearization Policy for the Korean Peninsula
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To North Korea, the denuclearization plan of the Korean Peninsula is the rst of its reactions to the American nuclear issue, and a regional ban on nuclear weapons that the country concerned can propose in order to deal with the regional nuclear issue. North Korea had already shown an interest in the establishment of a Nuclear- Weapon-Free Zone (NWFZ) in 1954; however, it began to assert the establishment of a NWFZ in the Korean Peninsula by applying the concept to their security environment in 1976, in which it started its activities as a member of the Non- Aligned Movement. The implementation of North Korea’s denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula unfolded in 1986, as North Korea authorized its plan for the denuclearization of the Peninsula as an immediate objective of its diplomatic activities. That is, North Korea pursued the establishment of a denuclearized zone on the Peninsula with the goal of managing its relationship with the Soviet Union and strengthening diplomacy of the Non-Aligned in 1986. Even though North Korea’s traditional claim for denuclearization of the Peninsula no longer served as an immediate task after 1994, when the first North Korean nuclear crisis was resolved, it re-emerged at the policy-level due to the 9.19 Joint Statement in 2005. Such re-authorization as party discourses was inuenced by the engagement of the United States and South Korea, and active persuasion by China. It is noted that the denuclearization policy for the Korean Peninsula was re-authorized as party discourses of North Korea even after their declaration of nuclear–state status. Though this assertion towards denuclearization of the Peninsula remained as party discourses even after the suspension of the Six–Party Talks, it is yet unclear whether their willingness to pursue this policy has once again been reinforced at the higher levels amid the recent situation of the inter–Korean and U.S.–North Korea dialogues. It is inevitable that the diplomatic solution for the North Korean nuclear issue shall begin by reinforcing the denuclearization argument in North Korea. It is time to draw the international community’s coordinated engagement to make North Korea choose denuclearization more clearly.
Abstract
To North Korea, the denuclearization plan of the Korean Peninsula is the rst of its reactions to the American nuclear issue, and a regional ban on nuclear weapons that the country concerned can propose in order to deal with the regional nuclear issue. North Korea had already shown an interest in the establishment of a Nuclear- Weapon-Free Zone (NWFZ) in 1954; however, it began to assert the establishment of a NWFZ in the Korean Peninsula by applying the concept to their security environment in 1976, in which it started its activities as a member of the Non- Aligned Movement. The implementation of North Korea’s denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula unfolded in 1986, as North Korea authorized its plan for the denuclearization of the Peninsula as an immediate objective of its diplomatic activities. That is, North Korea pursued the establishment of a denuclearized zone on the Peninsula with the goal of managing its relationship with the Soviet Union and strengthening diplomacy of the Non-Aligned in 1986. Even though North Korea’s traditional claim for denuclearization of the Peninsula no longer served as an immediate task after 1994, when the first North Korean nuclear crisis was resolved, it re-emerged at the policy-level due to the 9.19 Joint Statement in 2005. Such re-authorization as party discourses was inuenced by the engagement of the United States and South Korea, and active persuasion by China. It is noted that the denuclearization policy for the Korean Peninsula was re-authorized as party discourses of North Korea even after their declaration of nuclear–state status. Though this assertion towards denuclearization of the Peninsula remained as party discourses even after the suspension of the Six–Party Talks, it is yet unclear whether their willingness to pursue this policy has once again been reinforced at the higher levels amid the recent situation of the inter–Korean and U.S.–North Korea dialogues. It is inevitable that the diplomatic solution for the North Korean nuclear issue shall begin by reinforcing the denuclearization argument in North Korea. It is time to draw the international community’s coordinated engagement to make North Korea choose denuclearization more clearly.
참고문헌 (44)
- Choongkoo Lee, "The Authorization Processes and the Intensification Dynamics of the North Korean Nuclear Discourses in the Party Discourses of the Worker’s Party of Korea", PhD, pp.2016
- "DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Statement", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2013)
- "Rodong Sinmun", ~
- "North Korean Delegation in Swedish Forum Denies the Chance of Denuclearization Negotiation", Voice of America, ~ (2017)
- "Conversation with James Clapper" (2016)[URL]
- Lee Ho-jae, "Disarmament of the Korean Peninsula" (1989), Beopmunsa
- Yoo Jong-youl, "The Impact of North Korea’s Denuclearization", Peace Zone Movement Strategy, 1987, pp.82, 85~94
- Park Hee-kwon, "Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" (1992), Kyung Se-won
- Kim Jin-cheol, "Study on North Korea’s Denuclearized Zone Argument", Security Studies, 17, pp.144~146 (1987)
- Young C. Kim, "The Politics of Arms Control in Korea", Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 1(1), pp.119~123 (1989)
- 구갑우, "북한 '핵 담론'의 원형과 마음체계, 1947~1964년", 현대북한연구, 17(1), pp.197~250 (2014), 심연북한연구소[DOI]
- "Joint Declaration Regarding the Establishment of Denuclearized, Peace Zones in North Asian Region between the Workers’ Party and the Japan Socialist Party", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1981)
- "DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Statement", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2010)
- "Asia Should be Turned into a Zone of Peace without Nuclear and Rocket Weapons", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1958)
- "The Korean Peninsula and Nuclear Weapons—DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Memorandum", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2010)
- "Party History Material, No. 2", 45~ (2006)
- 劉性玉, "北韓의 核政策 動學에 관한 理論的 考察", 박사, 정치외교학, pp.1996
- Kim Il Sung, "“Response to a Question by the Chief Editor of Indian Weekly Newspaper Blitz,” August 6, 1975, vol. 30 Writings by Kim Il Sung", the Workers’ Party Publication, 420~421 (1985)
- "Workers’ Party the 6th Convention Central Committee Report–General Secretary Kim Il Sung", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1980)
- "Let Us Destroy the Nuclear Provocations by the American Imperials and Its Dogs and Fight in Unison to Turn the Korean Peninsula into a Zone of Denuclearized Peace—Dialogue by Democratic National Unification Front Central Committee Secretary Ryeo Yon-goo", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1984)
- Oh Jin-yong, "China–Soviet and South–North Koreas of Kim Il Sung Period" (2004), Nanam
- "Dong-a Ilbo", 50~ (1991)
- Dae-Sook Suh, "North Korea in 1986: Strengthening the Soviet Connection", Asian Survey, 27(1), pp.60~ (1987)
- "DPRK Government Statement", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1986)
- "Wholehearted Support and the Voice of Coalition", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1986)
- Joel S. Wit, "Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis", pp.446~ (2005), Moeum Books
- Ko Jung-woong, "Experience of Anti-Revisionist Fight of the Workers’ Party" (1995), Social Science Publications
- "The Red Flag is the Banner of Victories of Korean Revolution", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1996)
- "Let Us Not Be Fooled by the Deceitful Imperialists", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1996)
- "Bourgeois Democracy is Inhuman ‘Democracy’", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1996)
- "Fantasizing Capitalism Undermines Socialism", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (1996)
- Hubanashi Yoichi, "Kim Jong Il: The Last Bet", pp.518~ (2007), JoongAng Ilbo News Media
- Meredith Jung-en Woo, "North Korea in 2005: Maximizing Profit to Save Socialism", Asian Survey, 46(1), pp.51~53 (2006)
- Charles L. Pritchard, "Failed Diplomacy: The Tragic Story of How North Korea Got the Bomb", pp.108~ (2007), Brookings Institution Press
- "Joint Statement of the 4th Six–Party Talks", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2005)
- "DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Dialogue", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2005)
- "Monthly International Panorama—Anti-Historical Treason Going Against the Mainstream", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2007)
- "Monthly International Panorama—We Must Destroy the Domination Scheme of Reactionaries of History", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2007)
- "Ever More Fervent Self-Strength, Deepening Isolation", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2008)
- "Monthly International Panorama—The Risk of a New Cold War Increasing Day by Day", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2008)
- "DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs Statement", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2009)
- "Monthly International Panorama—The History Advances Along the Path of Self-Strength and Peace", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2013)
- "Monthly International Panorama—Today's World without peace and stability", Rodong Sinmun, ~ (2018)
- Vipin Narang, "Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict" (2014), Princeton University Press