본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Human Security: A Global Responsibility to Protect and Provide

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

For the past 15 years, the concept of human security has been promoted as a significant extension of traditional security studies. However, while human security has been present and visible in academic and practitioner discourse, it is yet truly to capture the imagination of specialists. Partly this is a result of the belligerent direction global politics has taken in the new millennium. Partly, however, it results from conceptual inadequacies internal to the notion itself. This article confronts the latter problem. It first examines the emergence of human security within the wider security studies literature, homes in on debates about human security, and draws important parallels between development and human security. It then builds on this to restate human security as freedom from fear and freedom from want, and to demonstrate how this conceptualization can be understood as a dual responsibility initially to protect and subsequently to provide. It finally considers whether a responsibility to intervene is generated by this approach. The brief conclusion summarizes the argument that this conceptualization generates a fresh way forward for human security studies.

Abstract

For the past 15 years, the concept of human security has been promoted as a significant extension of traditional security studies. However, while human security has been present and visible in academic and practitioner discourse, it is yet truly to capture the imagination of specialists. Partly this is a result of the belligerent direction global politics has taken in the new millennium. Partly, however, it results from conceptual inadequacies internal to the notion itself. This article confronts the latter problem. It first examines the emergence of human security within the wider security studies literature, homes in on debates about human security, and draws important parallels between development and human security. It then builds on this to restate human security as freedom from fear and freedom from want, and to demonstrate how this conceptualization can be understood as a dual responsibility initially to protect and subsequently to provide. It finally considers whether a responsibility to intervene is generated by this approach. The brief conclusion summarizes the argument that this conceptualization generates a fresh way forward for human security studies.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Alan Collins, "Contemporary Security Studies", pp.2~3 (2007), Oxford University Press
  2. Inis L. Claude, "Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization, 3rd ed" (1964), Random House
  3. John Stuart Mill, "On Liberty" (1869), Longman
  4. John A. Vasquez, "The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  5. Nicholas Thomas, "The Utility of Human Security: Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention", Security Dialogue, 33(2), pp.177~192 (2002)
  6. Barry Buzan, "Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis" (1997), Lynne Rienner
  7. Tsuneo Akaha, "Japan’s Comprehensive Security Policy: A New East Asian Environment", Asian Survey, 31(4), pp.324~340 (1991)
  8. Kurt W. Radtke, "Comprehensive Security in Asia: Views from Asia and the West on a Changing Security Environment" (2000), Brill
  9. Ole Waever, "Securitization and Desecuritization, In On Security" (1995), Columbia University Press
  10. Human Security: What Kind for the Asia Pacific?, In The Human Face of Security: Asia-Pacific Perspectives, "Amitav Acharya", Canberra,Australian National University, Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, ~, pp.Canberra Papers in Strategy and Defence, no. 144 (2002)
  11. Alan Rix, "Japan’s Aid Programs: Quantity vs. Quality" (1987), Australian Government Publishing Service
  12. Edward A. Olsen, "Homeland Security: Learning from Japan" (2004), The Independent Institute
  13. North-South: A Program for Survival (The Brandt Report), "Independent Commission on International Development Issues", ~ (1980)
  14. Common Security: A Blueprint for Survival (The Palme Report), "Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues", ~ (1982)
  15. Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report), "World Commission on Environment and Development", ~ (1987)
  16. "United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1994", pp.3~24 (1994), Oxford University Press
  17. We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century (Millennium Report of the UN Secretary-General), "Kofi Annan", ~ (2000)
  18. Commission on Human Security, "Human Security Now" (2003), CHS
  19. Human Security Center, "Human Security Report 2005: War and Peace in the 21st Century" (2005), Oxford University Press
  20. Gary King, "Rethinking Human Security", Political Science Quarterly, 116, pp.585~610 (2001)
  21. "Human Security Report"[URL]
  22. United Nations Development Programme, "United Nations Development Programme, New Dimensions of Human Security" (1994), Oxford University Press
  23. J. Peter Burgess, "What Is ‘Human Security?’", Security Dialogue, 35, pp.345~371 (2004)
  24. Alexandra Amouyel, "What Is Human Security", Human Security Journal, 1, pp.10~23 (2006)
  25. Buzan, "Security", ~
  26. Barry Buzan, "A Reductionist, Idealistic Notion that Adds Little Analytical Value", Security Dialogue, 35, pp.369~370 (2004)
  27. Roland Paris, "Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air", International Security, 26, pp.87~102 (2001)
  28. K. Krause, "The Key to a Powerful Agenda, if Properly Delimited", Security Dialogue, 35, pp.367~368 (2004)
  29. Sabina Alkire, "A Vital Core that Must Be Treated with the Same Gravitas as Traditional Security Threats", Security Dialogue, 35, pp.359~360 (2004)
  30. Edward Newman, "A Normatively Attractive but Analytically Weak Concept", Security Dialogue, 35, pp.358~359 (2004)
  31. S. Neil MacFarlane, "A Useful Concept that Risks Losing Its Political Salience", Security Dialogue, 35, pp.368~369 (2004)
  32. Heather Owens, "The Human Security Paradigm Shift: A New Lens on Canadian Foreign Policy", Canadian Foreign Policy, 7, pp.1~12 (1999)
  33. In Larger Freedom: Toward Development, Security and Human Rights for All (Report of the UN Secretary-General), "Kofi Annan", ~ (2005)
  34. G. Junne, "Postconflict Development; Meeting New Challenges", pp.318~ (2005), Lynne Rienner Publishers
  35. A. M. S. Watson, "An Introduction to International Political Economy", pp.4~ (2004), Continuum
  36. Lao PDR Risk Management and Mitigation Model, "Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining", GICHD, ~ (2007)
  37. "United Nations Development Programme, Mine Action 2009"[URL]
  38. Len Doyal, "A Theory of Human Need", pp.3~4 (1991), Macmillan
  39. David Luban, "Just War and Human Rights, In International Ethics", pp.195~216 (1985), Princeton University Press
  40. Martha Finnemore, "The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force" (2003), Cornell University Press
  41. The Responsibility to Protect, "International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty", International Development Research Centre, ~ (2001)
  42. "2005 World Summit Outcome"[URL]
  43. "United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1674" (2006)[URL]
  44. Gareth Evans, "Time for an Aid Invasion", The Age, ~ (2008)
  45. Sang-ho Song, "Military spy agency believes ship attacked by N.K.: sources", The Korea Herald, ~ (2010)
  46. So-hyun Kim, "What are the motives behind the Cheonan attack", The Korea Herald, ~ (2010)
  47. "United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development" (2009), Palgrave Macmillan
  48. "Lao PDR Human Security Profile" (2008)[URL]
  49. J. L. Holzgrefe, "The Humanitarian Intervention Debate, In Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas", pp.15~52 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  50. Michael Walzer, "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality" (1983), Basic Books
  51. Michael Walzer, "The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics, In International Ethics", pp.217~237 (1985), Princeton University Press
  52. John Rawls, "The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus", Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, VII, pp.1~27 (1987)
  53. Michael Walzer, "On Toleration", pp.21~ (1997), Yale University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)