본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Strategic Visions of China and the United States in South Asia and Beyond

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

China and the United States are the greatest strategic powers of the world today, where China is rising but the United States still remains predominant. Both have their grand strategic visions to shape and manage the world or regional political and security architecture. South Asia, being located in a critical and important geographical area,with players such as India, Pakistan, and others, is factored in their visions. It gives rise to a different combination of alignments and orientations of the states of South Asia and beyond. A kind of power game, along with its tangible manifestations, also seems conspicuous. This paper attempts to develop a broad framework of such developments, along with ramifications, both in place and projected, in the political power games of the relevant actors in South Asia.

Abstract

China and the United States are the greatest strategic powers of the world today, where China is rising but the United States still remains predominant. Both have their grand strategic visions to shape and manage the world or regional political and security architecture. South Asia, being located in a critical and important geographical area,with players such as India, Pakistan, and others, is factored in their visions. It gives rise to a different combination of alignments and orientations of the states of South Asia and beyond. A kind of power game, along with its tangible manifestations, also seems conspicuous. This paper attempts to develop a broad framework of such developments, along with ramifications, both in place and projected, in the political power games of the relevant actors in South Asia.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. David C. Kang, "The Security of Northeast Asia", Pacific Focus, 24(1), pp.1~21 (2009), 국제관계연구소
  2. Paul Kennedy, "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers-Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000" (1989), Vintage Books
  3. Zbigniew Brzezinski, "The Grand Chessboard-American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives", pp.40~ (1997), Basic Books
  4. David Scott, "The Great Power ‘'Great Game’' between India and China: ‘'The Logic of Geography", Geopolitics, 13(1), pp.4~ (2008)
  5. David Brewster, "India’'s Strategic Thinking about East Asia", Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(6), pp.827~ (2011)
  6. Kei Koga, "The US and East Asian Regional Security Architecture: Building a Regional Security Nexus on Hub-and-Spoke", Asian Perspective, 35(1), pp.1~36 (2011), 극동문제연구소
  7. "What Should We Expect from India as a Strategic Partner?"[URL]
  8. Stewart M. Patrick, "U S–-India: Strategic Partners with a Limitless Future", The Interventionist, Council on Foreign Relations (2011)
  9. Ashley J. Tellis, "What Should We Expect from India as a Strategic Partner", 243~247
  10. Teresita C. Schaffer, "The United States, India, and Global Governance: Can They Work Together?", The Washington Quarterly (2009)
  11. "The Limits of Indo-U.S. Partnership"[URL]
  12. Stewart M. Patrick, "U.S.-India: Strategic Partners with a Limitless Future", The Internationalist, Council on Foreign Relations (2011)
  13. Future of U.S. Power: Is China Going to Eclipse the United States? Two Possible Scenarios to 2040, "Tuomo Kuoso", Rajaratnam School of International Studies, ~, pp.RSIS Working Paper No. 203 (2010)
  14. Wang Gungwu, "China and the International Order: Some Historical Perspectives, In China and the New International Order" (2008), Routledge
  15. Rosemary Foot, "Chinese Strategies in U.S.–-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodation and Hedging", International Affairs, 82(1), pp.77~94 (2006)
  16. Gregory Chin, "Will China Change the Rules of Global Order", The Washington Quarterly, 33(4), pp.121~ (2010)
  17. Paul J. Smith, "China-Japan Relations and Future Geopolitics of East Asia", Asian Affairs: An American Review, 35(4), pp.245~246 (2009)
  18. Kerry Dumbaugh, "China’'s Foreign Policy: What Does It Mean for U.S. Global Interests?", CRS, pp.2~ (2008), Report for U.S. Congress
  19. Patrick, "U.S.–-India: Strategic Partners", ~
  20. Robert O. Blake, Jr., "Looking Ahead: U.S. - India Strategic Relations and the Transpacific Century", National Bureau of Asian Research (2011), U.S. Department of State–-Diplomacy in Action
  21. Manjeet S Pardesi, "RSIS Commentarie, In RSIS Commentaries" (2011), Nanyang Technological University
  22. "Will India Be a Better Strategic Partner than China?"[URL]
  23. "China’'s Military and Security Relationship with Pakistan"[URL]
  24. Michael G. Gallagher, "Future Indian-South Korean ties: can Seoul use India to balance China?", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 22(1), pp.43~56 (2010), 한국국방연구원
  25. Sajjad Ashraf, "Strains in U.S.–-Pakistan Security Cooperation: Implications for Afghanistan", RSIS Commentaries (2011), Nanyang Technological University
  26. "Indicators"[URL]
  27. Lisa Curtis, "Backgrounder, no. 2583", Heritage Foundation, ~ (2011)
  28. Gallagher, "Future Indian-South Korean Ties", 47~
  29. Dormandy, Xenia, "Indian’'s Foreign Policy", Centre for Science and International Affairs (2007), Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
  30. C. Raja Mohan, "Sino-Indian Relations: Growing Yet Fragile", RSIS Commentaries (2010), Nanyang Technological University
  31. Rajesh Basrur, "India’'s Agni V Missile: Game Changer?", RSIS Commentaries (2012), Nanyang Technological University
  32. Chunlong Lu and Min Xia, "The Interdependence between China and the United States: A Two-Level Analysis", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 22(3), pp.321~339 (2010), 한국국방연구원
  33. "Trade and Human Development in South Asia" (2009), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)