본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

王安石의 「明妃曲」과 歐陽脩의 和答詩 考察

The study on Wanganshi’s 「Mingfeiqu」and Ouyangxiu’s responding poetry

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Mingfeiqu of Wanganshi is the most marvelous, emotionally nurtured and fully imaginative poetry that is about Wangzhaojun. Among the past ancient Chinese poet’s works, Wangzhaojun is mostly described as a tragic character. And Han Yuandi is described as a kind emperor who is missing Sogun after being deceived but later realizing it. On the other hand, Moyanshou is described as the one who makes Sogun turn out to be the tragic character. Wanganshi’s poetry, therefore, is not following the original standard, but recreating Wangsogun by using the whole new concept and structure. That’s why he’d rather set Han Yuandi as the one who makes Sogun a tragic character. In contrast, Sogun’s Character is changed as a strong and powerful woman. The core of Qyanxiwu’s poetry that is to reply Mingfeiqu has got much deeper depth than Wanganshi’s. As he perceives, Han Yuandi causes himself misery that even makes his love in the palace fall down. And this is all because he has been cheated by an artist. Moreover, he claims that Han Yuandi is not capable of handling his own responsibilities, which leads the failure in protecting his people from being conquered by foreign power. Thus, he strongly criticizes Beisong-government by revealing Han Yuandi’s lame personality and incompetency.

Abstract

Mingfeiqu of Wanganshi is the most marvelous, emotionally nurtured and fully imaginative poetry that is about Wangzhaojun. Among the past ancient Chinese poet’s works, Wangzhaojun is mostly described as a tragic character. And Han Yuandi is described as a kind emperor who is missing Sogun after being deceived but later realizing it. On the other hand, Moyanshou is described as the one who makes Sogun turn out to be the tragic character. Wanganshi’s poetry, therefore, is not following the original standard, but recreating Wangsogun by using the whole new concept and structure. That’s why he’d rather set Han Yuandi as the one who makes Sogun a tragic character. In contrast, Sogun’s Character is changed as a strong and powerful woman. The core of Qyanxiwu’s poetry that is to reply Mingfeiqu has got much deeper depth than Wanganshi’s. As he perceives, Han Yuandi causes himself misery that even makes his love in the palace fall down. And this is all because he has been cheated by an artist. Moreover, he claims that Han Yuandi is not capable of handling his own responsibilities, which leads the failure in protecting his people from being conquered by foreign power. Thus, he strongly criticizes Beisong-government by revealing Han Yuandi’s lame personality and incompetency.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 류영표, "王安石詩選" (2003), 문이재
  2. 권호종, "歐陽脩詩選" (2002), 문이재
  3. 김원중, "宋詩鑑賞大觀" (1995), 까치
  4. 신영복, "中國歷代詩歌選集" (1994), 뿌리
  5. 정유선, "王安石 詠史詩" (2013), 學古房
  6. 翦伯贊, "中國全史" (1993), 학민사
  7. 權鎬鐘, "歐陽修詩硏究", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.1992
  8. 이근명, "新法 시행 이전의 王安石과 그 행적", 역사문화연구, (34), pp.311~338 (2009), 역사문화연구소
  9. 전지연, "왕안석의 정치사상 연구 : 문학작품을 중심으로", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2006
  10. 김장미, "왕안석 시의 내용 연구", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2006
  11. 오헌필, "王安石의 詩文에 나타난 出仕와 隱逸", 중국학논총, (19) (2005), 한국중국문화학회
  12. 이승신, "歐陽修의 史家的 면모", 중국어문논역총간, 12(12), pp.85~119 (2004), 중국어문논역학회
  13. 송용준, "歐陽脩의 詩論과 詩", 중국어문학, 32
  14. 歐陽脩, "歐陽脩全集" (2001), 中華書局
  15. 北京大學古文獻硏究所, "全宋詩" (1992), 北京大學出版社
  16. 解永會, "唐宋八大家詩文集 2" (1999), 天津古籍出版社
  17. 武建宇, "唐宋八大家詩文集 3" (1999), 天津古籍出版社
  18. 曹礎基, "中國古代文學 第三冊" (2000), 廣東高等敎育出版社
  19. 刘咏涛, "也谈王安石明妃曲", 成都大学学报(社会科学版) (2007)
  20. 周 玲, "明妃曲文化意蕴解读", 抚州师专学报 (2001)
  21. 易淑琼, "阅读视野嬗变中的王安石明妃曲", 寧夏大学学报(人文社会科学版) (2005)
  22. 马 冀, "围绕王安石明妃曲的争论及其价值", 内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (2009)
  23. 汪国林, "「论北宋文人雅集唱和诗作的议论性與闲適性」 ― 以 「明妃曲」唱和與重阳之会为考察中心", 毕节学院学报 (2009)
  24. 过元琛, "中国文学中王昭君形象的古今演变", 박사, pp.2010
  25. 张文德, "王昭君故事传承與嬗变", 박사, pp.2004
  26. 王抚超, "欧阳修诗歌研究", 석사, pp.2007
  27. 赵丽梅, "昭君诗文與昭君戏研究", 석사, pp.2010

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)