본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Impact of the Reinforced Sanctions on the North Korean Economy: Focused on the Ripple Effects from Trade Shock

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study attempts to examine how reinforced sanctions affected the North Korean economy focusing on the interdependence of industries. North Korea’s trade with China, accounting for more than 90 percent of its total trade, sharply dropped right after the UNSC intensified sanctions. Trade shock affects the domestic economy through a decrease in demand and supply, caused by the reduction of exports and imports, respectively. We estimate the ripple effect from trade shock after the recent sanctions using input–output analysis. According to the estimation results, export shock caused a decrease in value-added by 1.4–1.5 billion USD, which accounts for 8.5–9.0 percent of the North Korean GDP. In addition, import shock was concentrated on the capital goods of final goods, while it rarely affected intermediate imports. For the reinforced sanctions, the dependency of intermediate imports showed an increase in some industries such as agriculture, forestry and fishery and light industry. These results indicate that the economic impact from the recent sanctions could be different from that of the collapse of the former socialist bloc in the early 1990s. In terms of export shock, the sanctions’ negative effect is estimated to be higher. However, the negative effect from import shock is lower than that of the early 1990s, since it is far from reducing the intermediate inputs to the overall industry.

Abstract

This study attempts to examine how reinforced sanctions affected the North Korean economy focusing on the interdependence of industries. North Korea’s trade with China, accounting for more than 90 percent of its total trade, sharply dropped right after the UNSC intensified sanctions. Trade shock affects the domestic economy through a decrease in demand and supply, caused by the reduction of exports and imports, respectively. We estimate the ripple effect from trade shock after the recent sanctions using input–output analysis. According to the estimation results, export shock caused a decrease in value-added by 1.4–1.5 billion USD, which accounts for 8.5–9.0 percent of the North Korean GDP. In addition, import shock was concentrated on the capital goods of final goods, while it rarely affected intermediate imports. For the reinforced sanctions, the dependency of intermediate imports showed an increase in some industries such as agriculture, forestry and fishery and light industry. These results indicate that the economic impact from the recent sanctions could be different from that of the collapse of the former socialist bloc in the early 1990s. In terms of export shock, the sanctions’ negative effect is estimated to be higher. However, the negative effect from import shock is lower than that of the early 1990s, since it is far from reducing the intermediate inputs to the overall industry.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. The Effect of Economic Sanctions on North Korea and Usefulness of the Sanctions, "Byung-Yeon Kim", Institute of International Studies of Seoul National University, 2~, pp.Issue Briefing, no. 22 (2017)
  2. North Korean Economy under the Sanctions, Slide-To-Unlock, "Jong Suk Lee", Sejong Institute, 21~41 (2019)
  3. Suk Lee, "General Introduction, Assessment of North Korea’s Macroeconomy in 2019 and Prospect for 2020", KDI North Korean Economy Review, pp.9~12 (2020)
  4. Trend of North Korea’s Foreign Trade in 2018, "KOTRA", KOTRA, 3~ (2019)
  5. Hong Je Hwan, "North Korean Economy under the Sanctions Based on the Statistics of North Korea–China Trade", KDI North Korean Economy Review, pp.81~ (2019)
  6. Hyung Gon Chung, "Assessment of North Korea’s External Trade in 2019 and Prospect:Focusing on the Effect of the Sanctions on North Korea", KDI North Korean Economy Review, pp.65~67 (2020)
  7. "ECOS (Economic Statistics System)"[URL]
  8. 최지영, "A Study on Estimation of the Input-Output table for the North Korean Economy", 비교경제연구, 21(2), pp.25~43 (2014), 한국비교경제학회[DOI]
  9. "Asian Development Bank"[URL]
  10. Kyung Sul Kim, "Trend and Prospect of Energy Sector of North Korea", KDI North Korean Review, pp.130~140 (2020)
  11. Suk-Jin Kim, "Growth and Crisis of the North Korean Economy: Performance and Prospect", PhD, pp.2002
  12. "ECOS"[URL]
  13. "National Accounts Analysis of Main Aggregates"[URL]
  14. 장형수, "북한의 외화수급 및 외화보유액 추정과 북·미 비핵화 협상에 대한 시사점", 현대북한연구, 22(1), pp.8~43 (2019), 심연북한연구소[DOI]
  15. "USEIA (United States Energy Information Administration)"[URL]
  16. "FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)"[URL]
  17. "UN Trade Statistics"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)