Understanding the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Why did the ROK–U.S. alliance go through a process of alleviation by finding consensus rather than dividing when facing conflict over missile guidelines? What underlying principles operated between the two countries? This study aims to address these questions. As a result of a literature review, an analysis of the process of moving from conflict to alleviation in the Missile Guidelines along the timeline from the Park Chung-hee administration to the Kim Dae-jung administration, the Lee Myung-bak administration, and finally the Moon Jae-in administration shows that the occurrence of a “policy tradeoff” led to the transition from conflict to deescalation. Here, the author introduces the concept of a “policy tradeoff,” which in this study refers to the exchange of policies to maintain cooperative relations amid conflicting national principles. Through a case analysis, the author finds conflicting principles of “self-defense” in the ROK and “non-proliferation” in the United States. Consequently, the ROK aligned with the non-proliferation principle of the United States by pursuing denuclearization while the United States relaxed missile development restrictions in alignment with the ROK’s self-defense principle. The purpose was to transition the phase of conflict between the two nations regarding the ROK’s missile development to a phase of cooperation. Here, the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines underwent a gradual shift from conflict to cooperation based on the notion of a “policy tradeoff.”
Abstract
Why did the ROK–U.S. alliance go through a process of alleviation by finding consensus rather than dividing when facing conflict over missile guidelines? What underlying principles operated between the two countries? This study aims to address these questions. As a result of a literature review, an analysis of the process of moving from conflict to alleviation in the Missile Guidelines along the timeline from the Park Chung-hee administration to the Kim Dae-jung administration, the Lee Myung-bak administration, and finally the Moon Jae-in administration shows that the occurrence of a “policy tradeoff” led to the transition from conflict to deescalation. Here, the author introduces the concept of a “policy tradeoff,” which in this study refers to the exchange of policies to maintain cooperative relations amid conflicting national principles. Through a case analysis, the author finds conflicting principles of “self-defense” in the ROK and “non-proliferation” in the United States. Consequently, the ROK aligned with the non-proliferation principle of the United States by pursuing denuclearization while the United States relaxed missile development restrictions in alignment with the ROK’s self-defense principle. The purpose was to transition the phase of conflict between the two nations regarding the ROK’s missile development to a phase of cooperation. Here, the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines underwent a gradual shift from conflict to cooperation based on the notion of a “policy tradeoff.”
참고문헌 (55)
- "ROK–U.S. Leaders’ Joint Statement" (2021)[URL]
- "Briefing by Kim Hyun-jong, Second Deputy Director at the Office of National Security, on the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines Revision" (2020)[URL]
- J. D. Morrow, "Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggression Model of Alliances", American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), pp.930~ (1991)
- C. Shoemaker, "Patron–Client State Relationships" (1984), Praeger Publishers
- G. H. Snyder, "The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics", World Politics, 36(4), pp.484~ (1984)
- Park Chang-kwon, "Increasing Ballistic Missile Threats of North Korea and South Korea’s Strategic Responses", The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 28(2), pp.7~48 (2012)
- Kim Yun-tae, "Balanced Capability Planning of ROK Forces for the Next Five Years", The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 29(1), pp.51~85 (2013)
- Park Hwee-rhak, "Options and Preparations for South Korea against the Threat of North Korean Nuclear Missile Attack", Journal of National Defense Studies, 56(1), pp.29~52 (2013)
- Chang Ryong, "A Study on the Military Response against the Build Up of North Korea’s Nuclear and Long–Range Ballistic Missile Capabilities", Journal of Military History Studies, (144), pp.331~352 (2017)
- Hyun In-taek, "The International Politics of THAAD: A Complex Security Dilemma and South Korea’s Strategic Alternatives", New Asia, 24(3), pp.38~71 (2017)
- Kim Kang-nyeong, "The Process, Meaning, and Tasks of Lifting the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines", Korea and Global Affairs, 5(4), pp.57~100 (2021)
- Song Geun-ho, "South Korea–U.S. Space Cooperation: Space Development Cooperation Issues and Suggestions on Ways to Strengthen Cooperation", National Strategy, 27(4), pp.95~126 (2021)
- Kim Ji-il, "Background and Implications of the Development of the Hyunmoo Missile", Strategic Studies, 24(3), pp.85~110 (2017)
- Kim Ji-il, "Cause of the Kim Youngsam Administration’s Failure to Revise the South Korea–U.S. Missile Guidelines", Korean Journal of Political Science, 28(4), pp.1~26 (2020)
- Lee Myung-bak, "The President’s Time 2008–2013", pp.253~ (2015), RH Korea
- "President’s Report, Private Meeting at Panmunjom", Presidential Archives of Korea under the National Archives of Korea, EA0002560, ~ (1968)
- "President’s Report, Recent Negotiations on Current Issues between the ROK and the United States", Presidential Archives of Korea under the National Archives of Korea, EA0002607, ~ (1968)
- "North Korea Places Soviet Frog Missiles to the DMZ, within Seoul’s range", The Dong-a Ilbo, ~ (1975)
- "North Korea moves Missiles within Range of Seoul and Establishes New Airfield Near DMZ", Maeil Business Newspaper, ~ (1975)
- "“Informal Remarks in Guam with Newsmen,” Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley" (1969)[URL]
- , Box H-139, Folder: NSDM 48, Box H-215, NSC H-files, NPM, "1970", ~
- "Memorandum for the President from Kissinger, “U.S. Programs in Korea”", National Archives and Records Administration Ⅱ, March 14, 1970, Folder: NSDM 48, Box H-215, NSC H-files, NPM, ~ (1970)
- "U.S. Programs in Korea", National Archives and Records Administration Ⅱ, March 20, 1970, Folder: NSDM 48, Box H-215, NSC H-files, NPM, ~ (1970)
- Kim Ji-il, "Rational Inference of Nuclear Missile Development during Park Jung-Hee’s Administration and Study of the Process of Conflict and Alleviation within the South Korea–U.S. Alliance", The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 33(1) (2017)
- Gu Sang-hoe, "30 Years in Weapons Systems Research and Development", Defense & Technology, 228 (1998)
- Ahn Dong-man, "Baekgom, Record of Taking on a Challenge and of Victory", pp.123~ (2016), Planet Media
- "Memorandum for Scowcroft, “Sale of Rocket Propulsion Technology to South Korea”", Ford Presidential Library, February 4, 1975, E.O. 12958, SEC. 3.3, ~ (1975)
- "Telegram from Kissinger, “ROK Plans to Develop Nuclear Weapons and Missiles”", Ford Presidential Library, March 4, 1975, E.O. 12958, SEC.3.4, ~ (1975)
- National Archives of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, Compilation and Cultural Affairs Division, "Translation of Foreign Records, Compilation II: 1970s South Korea–U.S. Relations (Part A)", National Archives of Korea, 144~147 (2008)
- "President’s Report, “Content of the Meeting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State ‘Gerhelen’”", Presidential Archives of Korea under the National Archives of Korea, June 25, 1975, EA0003517, ~ (1975)
- CIA, "South Korea: Nuclear Developments and Strategic Decisionmaking", National Foreign Assessment Center, ~ (1978)
- "Telegram to SECSTATE from Amembassy Seoul, “ROK Nuclear Reprocessing”", National Security Agency, Ford Presidential Library, October 31, 1975, Box 11, ~ (1975)
- "Telegram to SECSTATE from Amembassy Seoul, “ROK Nuclear Reprocessing Plant: Canadian Approach”", National Security Agency, Ford Presidential Library, December 16, 1975, Box 11, ~ (1975)
- "Telegram to Amembassy Seoul from SECSTATE, “Korean Reprocessing”", National Security Agency, Ford Presidential Library, December 12, 1975, Box 11, ~ (1975)
- "Telegram to SECSTATE from Ambassador, “Locked Proposal for ROK”", Ford Presidential Library, ~ (1974)
- Kim Ji-il, "Beyond ‘Abandonment’ and ‘Entrapment’: The Dilemma of Missile Development of Korea and the Korea–U.S. Alliance", PhD, pp.2016
- Lim Soo-ho, "Existential Deterrence and Proliferation through Negotiation: North Korea’s Nuclear Policy and Crisis Diplomacy (1989–2006)", PhD, pp.2007
- "South Korea Is Developing a Long–Range Cruise Missile", The Hankyoreh, ~ (1996)
- "Will Not Produce∙Possess∙Use Nuclear Weapons", The Dong-a Ilbo, ~ (1991)
- "Government Announces ‘Absence of Nuclear Weapons’", The Dong-a Ilbo, ~ (1991)
- "North Korea Announces Successful Satellite Launch...Enters Expected Orbit", Yonhap News Agency, ~ (2012)
- Republic of Korea National Assembly, "Minutes of the 284th Inspection Session of the National Defense Committee Meeting, 18th Congressional Record", 18~19 (2009)
- Republic of Korea National Assembly, "Minutes of the 284th Inspection Session of the National Defense Committee Meeting, 18th Congressional Record", 49~ (2009)
- Republic of Korea National Assembly, "Minutes of the 282nd Plenary Session, 3rd Session of the 18th Congressional Record", 10~18 (2009)
- Republic of Korea National Assembly, "Minutes of the 282nd Plenary Session of the 18th Congressional Record", 18~72 (2009)
- Republic of Korea National Assembly, "Minutes of the 311th Inspection Session of the Foreign Affairs, Trade and Unification Committee Meeting, 19th Congressional Record", 37~ (2012)
- "Joint Statement of the 41st ROK–U.S. Security Consultative Meeting", ~ (2009)
- "Sharp Says “Review of Missile Guidelines Unnecessary at the Moment”", Hankook Ilbo, ~ (2009)
- "Meaning of the Four Principles for Peaceful Nuclear Utilization", Yonhap News Agency, ~ (2004)
- "IAEA Officially Acknowledges Korea’s Nuclear Transparency" (2008)[URL]
- Kim Ji-il, "The New Missile Guideline Amendment: A Case Study", National Strategy, 24(4) (2018)
- "North Korea’s 6th Nuclear Test; Explosion Power, Several Times That of the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb... Estimated to Be over 50 to 70 kt", Yonhap News Agency, ~ (2017)
- "Written Briefing by Spokesperson Park Soo-hyun Regarding the Results of the Phone Call between the South Korean and U.S. Presidents" (2017)[URL]
- "No Nuclear Weapons in South Korea, Says President Moon" (2017)[URL]
- "National Assembly Address at the 2018 Cheongwadae Yearly Budget Proposal and Fund Management Plan Submissions" (2017)[URL]