Scientific Metaphysics in the Writings of Hu Shih: strengths and limitations
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper intends to become an entry point for analysis and research on Hu Shih’s way of thinking about science and limitations regarding his scientific metaphysics. Hu’s disbelief in ghosts and gods and his advocacy for the abolition of feudal superstition became a theoretical foundation for his atheism, which undergirded both his scientific way of thought and his belief system. This paper highlights Hu’s ideas regarding “science” and “worldview” to discover the meaning behind his perspective on science and specify limitations in this way of thought.
Abstract
This paper intends to become an entry point for analysis and research on Hu Shih’s way of thinking about science and limitations regarding his scientific metaphysics. Hu’s disbelief in ghosts and gods and his advocacy for the abolition of feudal superstition became a theoretical foundation for his atheism, which undergirded both his scientific way of thought and his belief system. This paper highlights Hu’s ideas regarding “science” and “worldview” to discover the meaning behind his perspective on science and specify limitations in this way of thought.
참고문헌 (8)
- Shih, Hu, "The Collection of Hu Shih. Vol. 2" (1998), Peking University Press
- Shih, Hu, "The Complete Collection of Hu Shih. Vol. 29" (2003), Anhui Education Press
- Yadong Library, "Science and Philosophy of Life" (2014), Shanghai Joint Publishing Company
- D. W. Kwok, "Scientism in Modern Chinese Thought" (1998), Jiangsu People's Publishing House
- Zhesheng, Ou, "The burden of liberalism: Modern Interpretation of Hu Shi's Thoughts" (2003), Jiangxi Education Publishing House
- Xiaoyan, Peng, "Dialectics of Emotionalism and Rationality: Anti enlightenment during the May Fourth Movement" (2019), Linking Publishing
- Yingshi, Yu, "Rediscover Hu Shih’s History: Recognition of Hu Shih’s life and Thought" (2014), Lianjing
- Rya Butterfield, "China’s 20th century Sophist: analysis of Hu Shi’s ethics, logic, and pragmatism", Doctor, pp.2012