본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국가중요시설 방호직무 종사자의 법적 지위와 노동기본권 제한

Legal Status and Restriction on Basic Labor Rights of Workers Engaged in the Protective Duties of National Major Facilities

3

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since the protective duties of workers engaged in the protective duties of national majorfacilities, such as a special private security guard pursuant to the Securities ServicesIndustry Act and a private police pursuant to the Police Assigned for Special Guard Act,take the public nature, their working conditions, as provided under the Labor StandardsAct, and their basic labor rights, as secured in Article 33 (1) of the Constitutional law, areseverely restricted in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. Recently, several problems have occurred in respect of the guarantee of social position& the improvement of labor conditions for the special private security guard and privatepolice, which are the workers engaged in the protective duties of national major facilities,and their detailed work scope & limits and the restriction necessity of their basic laborrights and its legal justification for the stable operation and management of national majorfacilities. The special private security guard and private police, which conducts the protectiveduties of national major facilities, have the position of normal workers (private person) inprinciple. However, because of the special position as the workers engaged in theprotective duties of national major facilities and the public nature of the guard businessconducted by them, the special private security guard is burdened with the ‘strike(collective action) injunction’ pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Securities Services IndustryAct and the private police is burdened with the stern obligation such as the ‘restriction ofthe labor’s three primary rights’ pursuant to Article 11 of the Police Assigned for SpecialGuard Act.

Abstract

Since the protective duties of workers engaged in the protective duties of national majorfacilities, such as a special private security guard pursuant to the Securities ServicesIndustry Act and a private police pursuant to the Police Assigned for Special Guard Act,take the public nature, their working conditions, as provided under the Labor StandardsAct, and their basic labor rights, as secured in Article 33 (1) of the Constitutional law, areseverely restricted in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. Recently, several problems have occurred in respect of the guarantee of social position& the improvement of labor conditions for the special private security guard and privatepolice, which are the workers engaged in the protective duties of national major facilities,and their detailed work scope & limits and the restriction necessity of their basic laborrights and its legal justification for the stable operation and management of national majorfacilities. The special private security guard and private police, which conducts the protectiveduties of national major facilities, have the position of normal workers (private person) inprinciple. However, because of the special position as the workers engaged in theprotective duties of national major facilities and the public nature of the guard businessconducted by them, the special private security guard is burdened with the ‘strike(collective action) injunction’ pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Securities Services IndustryAct and the private police is burdened with the stern obligation such as the ‘restriction ofthe labor’s three primary rights’ pursuant to Article 11 of the Police Assigned for SpecialGuard Act.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김동희, "행정법Ⅱ" (2014), 박영사
  2. 김형배, "노동법" (2014), 박영사
  3. 박균성, "행정법론(下)" (2014), 박영사
  4. 임종률, "노동법" (2012), 박영사
  5. 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2014), 박영사
  6. 허 영, "한국헌법론" (2014), 박영사
  7. 홍정선, "경찰행정법" (2013), 박영사
  8. 공배완, "민간경비의 직무에 관한 청원경찰법상 제도와 경비업법상 특수경비제도의 비교 연구", 법학연구, (38), pp.325~347 (2010), 한국법학회
  9. 김성진, "특수경비원제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 경찰연구논집, (7) (2010)
  10. 문무기, "특별한 신분을 가진 근로자의 노동기본권", 노동판례리뷰 (2009)
  11. 이민형, "국가중요시설경비의 제도적 정립을 위한 청원경찰법 개정방안", Crisisonomy, 8(4), pp.231~248 (2012), 위기관리 이론과 실천
  12. 이승길, "특수경비원의 쟁의행위 금지에 관한 연구", 노동법논총, 18, pp.253~295 (2010), 한국비교노동법학회
  13. 정재극, "북한군 특수부대 테러 대비 특수경비원의 방호능력 발전방안", 한국민간경비학회보, 11(3), pp.195~220 (2012), 한국민간경비학회
  14. 최동식, "효율적인 국가기반체계 보호를 위한 법·제도 분석 연구", 한국방재학회논문집, 14(1), pp.233~245 (2014), 한국방재학회
  15. 최병권, "국가중요시설 대테러 업무수행에 관한 발전방안", 한국테러학회보, 2(1), pp.142~168 (2009), 한국테러학회[DOI]
  16. 경찰청, "경찰백서 2011-2014", ~
  17. "국가대테러활동지침(대통령훈령 제309호)", ~
  18. "국가중요시설 지정 및 방호 훈령(국방부훈령 제1057호)", ~
  19. 정인섭, "법률에 의한 쟁의행위금지와 근로삼권의 제한", 제102회 헌법실무연구회, (11) (2010), 헌법실무연구회
  20. 헌법재판연구원, "헌법이론과 실무" (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)