피의자신문조서의 왜곡 유형과 정도에 관한 연구 - 조서와 영상녹화물의 비교를 통한 사례연구 -
The Extent and Types of Distortions in the Examination Record - A Comparison of Paper and Video Records -
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There has been a lot of criticism on the use of examination record in Korean criminal justice system due to its questionable validity. Since the majority of previous research on this issue was carried out from legal perspective and there is little empirical evidence to point out the problems of examination record. In this study a new empirical method was applied to analyze the discrepancies between paper examination records and video records. The types of distortions were categorized by their influence and pattern. Three different types of influence were identified (influence on verdict, influence on sentencing, and procedural defect) and seven distortion patterns (two omissions and five commissions) were operationally defined. Ten criminal case records were coded according to the influence and pattern criteria. The results showed discrepancy ratio between the paper and the video records in the sample was approximately 80%, and there were around 4.2 distortions per page in the paper records. Although this study is the first attempt to empirically analyze the discrepancies between paper and video records, there should be a caution before generalizing the results of this study due to its methodological limitations. Replication of this study is needed with a larger sample.
Abstract
There has been a lot of criticism on the use of examination record in Korean criminal justice system due to its questionable validity. Since the majority of previous research on this issue was carried out from legal perspective and there is little empirical evidence to point out the problems of examination record. In this study a new empirical method was applied to analyze the discrepancies between paper examination records and video records. The types of distortions were categorized by their influence and pattern. Three different types of influence were identified (influence on verdict, influence on sentencing, and procedural defect) and seven distortion patterns (two omissions and five commissions) were operationally defined. Ten criminal case records were coded according to the influence and pattern criteria. The results showed discrepancy ratio between the paper and the video records in the sample was approximately 80%, and there were around 4.2 distortions per page in the paper records. Although this study is the first attempt to empirically analyze the discrepancies between paper and video records, there should be a caution before generalizing the results of this study due to its methodological limitations. Replication of this study is needed with a larger sample.
참고문헌 (28)
- 권영법, "현행 조서관련 규정에 관한 비판적인 고찰 - 비교법적인 고찰을 통한 현행 규정의 검토와 대안의 모색을 중심으로 -", 저스티스, (131), pp.202~242 (2012), 한국법학원[DOI]
- 김성룡, "형사절차상 신문방법과 진술의 왜곡가능성에 관한 소고", 법학논고, 25 (2006), 경북대학교 법학연구소
- 김청택, "법정의사결정에서의 판사들의 인지편향", 서울대학교 법학, 51(4), pp.317~345 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김희균, "크로포드 사건 : 형사피고인의 대질심문권의 재발견", 법조, 54(7), pp.145~170 (2005), 법조협회
- 박노섭, "형사소송법상 참고인 진술의 문제점", 경찰학연구, (6), pp.46~70 (2004), 경찰대학
- 박노섭, "수사절차상의 신문과 비디오 녹화제도", 형사정책, 16(1), pp.103~144 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
- 박노섭, "개정형사소송법에 의한 조서재판위험성에 대한 소고", 경찰학연구, 7(2), pp.9~30 (2007), 경찰대학
- 安 晟 秀, "미국 증거법상 전문법칙 및 수사단계에서의 진술 내지 조서의 증거능력", 저스티스, (84), pp.191~220 (2005), 한국법학원
- 사법경찰관리의 진술증거수집 효율화 방안: 진술녹화제도 도입에 대한 사법경찰관리와 피의자의 태도조사, "엄명용", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구총서 2004년 41호 (2004)
- 이성기, "당사자주의 원칙에 입각한 피의자 대면권의 헌법적 권리와 조서의 증거능력에 관한 논의", 성신법학, (12) (2013)
- 이종엽, "법심리학적 관점에서 본 진술증거의 평가방법", 저스티스, (120), pp.172~222 (2010), 한국법학원
- 조정래, "수사과정상 피의자진술을 현출하는 방법의 한계와 보완 - 영상녹화물의 활용을 중심으로 -", 법학논고, (36), pp.329~360 (2011), 법학연구원
- 황정인, "수사절차에서의 진술내용에 관한 증거방법 - 전문법칙상 수사기관이 작성한 조서의 증거능력을 중심으로 -", 경찰학연구, 11(2), pp.47~72 (2011), 경찰대학
- 송희식, "증거법이론에 있어서 인식과 진술* - 증거법 일반이론의 모색 -", 형사법의 신동향, (39), pp.33~72 (2013), 대검찰청
- Drizin, S., "The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world", North Carolina Law Review, 82, pp.891~1007 (2004)
- Findley, K., "The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases", Wisconsin Law Review, pp.291~398 (2006)
- Kassin, S., "On the psychology of confessions: Dose Innocence put innocents at risk?", American Psychologist, 60, pp.215~228 (2005)
- Kassin, S., "The psychology of confessions", Annual Review of Law and Social Science, pp.193~217 (2008)
- Kassin, S., "“I’m innocent!” Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room", Law and Human Behavior, 23, pp.499~516 (1999)
- Kassin, S., "Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt", Law and Human Behavior, 27, pp.187~203 (2003)
- Law and Human Behavior, "Special issue: Emotion in legal judgment and decision making", 30(2) (2006)
- Leo, R. A., "Inside the interrogation room", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, pp.266~303 (1996)
- Leo, R. A., "The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, pp.429~296 (1998)
- Leo, R. A., "Bringing reliability back in: False confessions and legal safeguards in the twenty-first century", Wisconsin Law Review, pp.479~539 (2006)
- Leo, R. A., "From false confession to wrongful conviction: Seven psychological precesses", The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38, pp.9~54 (2010)
- Meissner, C., "“He’s guilty!” Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception", Law and Human Behavior, 26, pp.469~480 (2002)
- Meissner, C. A., "Interrogations, confessions and entrapment", pp.85~106 (2004), Kluwer Academic
- "수상한 조서 – 309동 성폭행 사건의 진실" (2013)[URL]