DNA 대량검색의 유용성 및 문제점 고찰
Considering the Forensic Benefits and Legal Problems of DNA Mass Screening Using Drag Net
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Today DNA is one of the most highly regarded tool available to the forensic scientist and the DNA profiles obtained from crime scene material are compared with those of known potential suspect and volunteers(i.e. DNA screening). The scope of the proposed DNA database must be limited to crime investigation. Recent changes in legislation have begun to allow for the possibility to expand the parameters of DNA database searches, taking into account the prediction of surname, racial profiling, familial kinships, and EVCsExternally Visible Characteristics et al. DNA mass screening can be carried out in cases where no DNA profile match is obtained and no other evidence is available. In such DNA dragnets, larger number of volunteers(hundreds to thousands), usually those living in the geographic region where the crime occurred, are invited to voluntarily provide a saliva sample for STR profiling. Using conventional autosomal STR profiling in the DNA dragnet limits the possibilities of another purpose search to close relatives of the unknown, non-participating perpetrator. Since Y-STR profile identifies a man together with all his paternal male relatives, such as surname, and then a Y-STR dragnet is more effective. DNA phenotyping refers to the prediction of appearance traits of unknown sample donors directly from biological samples found at the criminal scene. “Biological witness” outcomes of forensic DNA phenotyping can provide investigative leads to trace unknown persons, who are unidentifiable with current comparative DNA profiling. Because of the Information on the dynamic of the human genome, including its surname, racial profiling, familial kinships, and EVCs, which has several advanced since such laws were made, and should therefore not be use of DNA shall be regulated on the particular forensic purpose but not the type of markers that likely are changing over time with increasing genetic knowledge.
Abstract
Today DNA is one of the most highly regarded tool available to the forensic scientist and the DNA profiles obtained from crime scene material are compared with those of known potential suspect and volunteers(i.e. DNA screening). The scope of the proposed DNA database must be limited to crime investigation. Recent changes in legislation have begun to allow for the possibility to expand the parameters of DNA database searches, taking into account the prediction of surname, racial profiling, familial kinships, and EVCsExternally Visible Characteristics et al. DNA mass screening can be carried out in cases where no DNA profile match is obtained and no other evidence is available. In such DNA dragnets, larger number of volunteers(hundreds to thousands), usually those living in the geographic region where the crime occurred, are invited to voluntarily provide a saliva sample for STR profiling. Using conventional autosomal STR profiling in the DNA dragnet limits the possibilities of another purpose search to close relatives of the unknown, non-participating perpetrator. Since Y-STR profile identifies a man together with all his paternal male relatives, such as surname, and then a Y-STR dragnet is more effective. DNA phenotyping refers to the prediction of appearance traits of unknown sample donors directly from biological samples found at the criminal scene. “Biological witness” outcomes of forensic DNA phenotyping can provide investigative leads to trace unknown persons, who are unidentifiable with current comparative DNA profiling. Because of the Information on the dynamic of the human genome, including its surname, racial profiling, familial kinships, and EVCs, which has several advanced since such laws were made, and should therefore not be use of DNA shall be regulated on the particular forensic purpose but not the type of markers that likely are changing over time with increasing genetic knowledge.
참고문헌 (32)
- Andrew D. Thibedeau, "National Forensic DNA Databases", Council for Responsible Genetics, ~ (2011)
- Douglas H. Ubelaker, "Forensic Science_Current Issue future Direction" (2012), Wiley-Blackwell
- Jaiprakash G. Shewale, "Forensic DNA Analysis_Current Practice and Emerging Technologies" (2014), CRC Press
- John M. Butler, "Advanced Topics in Forensic Science" (2012), AP
- John M. Butler, "Fundamental of Forensic DNA Typing" (2009), AP
- "The blooding"[URL]
- Manfred Kayser, "Encylopedia of Forensic Sci.", pp.369~374 (2013)
- 권창국, "DNA 데이터베이스의 재 고찰 -YSTR 분석 및 가계검색(Familial Search)을 통한 데이터베이스의 우회적 확장문제-", 한국경찰학회보, 15(6), pp.35~58 (2013), 한국경찰학회
- 서승범, "가족관계를 이용한 DNA 데이터베이스 검색", 대한법의학회지, 35(2), pp.92~97 (2011), 대한법의학회
- Bruijning-van Dongen C.J., "Bayesian networks for victim identification on the basis of DNA profiles", Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series, 2, pp.466~468 (2009)
- Cassandra J. Gershaw, "Forensic utilization of familial search in DNA databases", Forensic Science International Genetics, 5, pp.16~20 (2011)
- Claus Borsting, "Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics", Forensic Science International Genetics, 18, pp.78~89 (2015)
- Fan Liu, "Colorful DNA polymorphisms in humans", Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 24, pp.562~575 (2013)
- Farzeen Kader, "DNA methylation and application in forensic science", Forensic Science International, 249, pp.255~265 (2015)
- Koops B.J., "Forensic DNA phenotyping regulatory issues", Columbia Science Technology Law Rev, 9, pp.158~202 (2008)
- Kornkiat Vongpaisamsin, "Ancestry informative markers for distinguishing between Thai population based on genome-wide association datasets", Legal Medicine, 17(4), pp.245~250 (2015)
- Maguire C.N., "Familial searching: A specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the national DNA database to identity unknown offenders via their relatives-The UK experience", Forensic Sci. Int'l Genetics, 8, pp.1~9 (2014)
- Manfred Kayser, "Forensic DNA phenotyping: Prediction human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purpose", Forensic Science International Genetics, 18, pp.33~48 (2015)
- Manfred Kayser, "DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: Motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations", Forensic Science International Genetics, 3, pp.154~161A (2009)
- M’Charek, "Silent witness, articulate collective DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits", Bioethics, 22, pp.519~528 (2008)
- P.N. Ossorio, "About face forensic genetic testing for race and visible traits", J. Law Med. Ethics, 34, pp.277~292 (2006)
- Susan Walsh, "Developmental validation of the HlrisPlex system;DNA-based eye and hair colour prediction for forensic and anthropological usage", Forensic Science International Genetics, 9, pp.150~161 (2014)
- Spinney L, "Eyewitness identification - line-ups on trial", Nature, 453, pp.442~444 (2008)
- Titia Sijen, "Molecular approaches for forensic cell type identification_On mRNA, miRNA, DNA methylation and microbial markers", Forensic Science International Genetics, 18, pp.21~32 (2015)
- Turi E. King, "What's in name? Y-chromosomes, surnames and the genetic genealogy revolution", Trends in Genetics, 25, pp.351~360 (2009)
- Whittall H, "The forensic use of DNA scientific success story ethical minefield", Biotechnol. J, 3, pp.303~305 (2008)
- Yaran Yang, "Application of next-generation sequencing technology in forensic science", Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 12, pp.190~197 (2014)
- "개인정보보호법(법률 제12844호 타법개정 2014.11.19.시행)", ~
- "국립과학수사연구원 감정처리규정 (2014)", ~
- "디엔에이신원확인정보의보호및이용에관한 법률(제12776호 일부개정 2015.04.16.시행) 및 동 시행령(대통령령 제22341호 타법개정 2010.8.13.시행)", ~
- "생명윤리및안전에관한 법률(제12844호 타법개정 2014.11.19.시행), 동 시행령(대통령령 제25840호 타법개정 2015.1.1.시행) 및 동 시행규칙(보건복지부령 제283호타법개정 2015.1.5.시행)", 시행), ~ (2014)
- "실종아동등의보호및지원에관한 법률(제12844호, 타법개정 2014.11.19.시행), 동 시행령(대통령령 제25751호 타법개정 2014.11.19. 시행)및 동 시행규칙(보건복지부령 제220호 일부개정 2013.11.20.시행)", ~