진양 『악서』 공후조 도설(圖說)에 나타난 공후 명칭의 혼용 문제 분석
Inquiry into the Mingled Usage of Gonghu’s Name in Explanatory Diagrams of Jinyang's『Akseo』 Gonghu-Article
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Jinyang's 『Akseo 樂書』 is a very important and valuable music book which shows and explains different types of Gonghu through explanatory diagrams. Especially, this book makes a fivefold division of Gonghu into Big-Gohghu (大箜篌), Small-Gonghu (小箜篌), Angular Gonghu (豎箜篌), Recumbent Gonghu (臥箜篌) and Phoenix's head Gonghu (鳳首箜篌) and presents all the fine details each of them concretely through explanatory diagrams. But in Gonghu Article of Jinyang's 『Akseo 樂書』 there is quite a bit of gap between diagram and explanation. And it seems to me that this considerable difference was caused by Jinyang's excessive enthusiasm. That is to say, he wanted to show as many data as possible and collected all existing data indiscriminately. Namely, his explanatory diagrams are a melting pot of the Gonghu-study of ancient sages, in which materials about Zither-like Gonghu and Harp-like Gonghu are jumbled together. Furthermore this considerable gab between diagram and explanation allows one reasoning that Jinyang recognized all Gonghu only as one type of Harp. Eventually, the name of Recumbent Gonghu (臥箜篌) that he had classified caused cognominal confusion between two kinds of Gonghu, and this continues to the present time.
Abstract
Jinyang's 『Akseo 樂書』 is a very important and valuable music book which shows and explains different types of Gonghu through explanatory diagrams. Especially, this book makes a fivefold division of Gonghu into Big-Gohghu (大箜篌), Small-Gonghu (小箜篌), Angular Gonghu (豎箜篌), Recumbent Gonghu (臥箜篌) and Phoenix's head Gonghu (鳳首箜篌) and presents all the fine details each of them concretely through explanatory diagrams. But in Gonghu Article of Jinyang's 『Akseo 樂書』 there is quite a bit of gap between diagram and explanation. And it seems to me that this considerable difference was caused by Jinyang's excessive enthusiasm. That is to say, he wanted to show as many data as possible and collected all existing data indiscriminately. Namely, his explanatory diagrams are a melting pot of the Gonghu-study of ancient sages, in which materials about Zither-like Gonghu and Harp-like Gonghu are jumbled together. Furthermore this considerable gab between diagram and explanation allows one reasoning that Jinyang recognized all Gonghu only as one type of Harp. Eventually, the name of Recumbent Gonghu (臥箜篌) that he had classified caused cognominal confusion between two kinds of Gonghu, and this continues to the present time.
참고문헌 (40)
- 陸楫, "古今說海 卷129", ~
- 劉昫, "『舊唐書』 卷9, 卷29"
- 蔡邕, "後漢『琴操』 卷上12a7", ~
- 徐一夔, "『明集禮』 卷53上", ~
- 馬端臨, "『文獻通考』 卷137. 卷137, 卷146, 卷148,卷310", ~
- 司馬遷, "漢『史記』 卷24, 48b3-50a7", ~
- 劉熙, "後漢『釋名』 卷7.卷7, 2b8-3a2", ~
- 沈約, "478-488 『宋書』 卷19", ~
- 魏徵, , 15~
- 屠喬, "明『十六國春秋』 卷73", ~
- 陳暘, "『樂書』 卷119, 卷123, 卷128 ,卷129, 卷158", ~
- 孔子, "漢『禮記』 8b6-9a2", ~
- 馮惟敏, "『山堂肆考』, 卷162. 49a4", ~
- 歐陽修, "『新唐書』 卷222下", ~
- 顧起元, "說略』 卷11", 11~
- 陳耀文, "明『天中記』 卷43", ~
- 王欽若, "北宋『冊府元龜』 卷570", ~
- 李昉, "『太平廣記』 卷316. 卷205"
- 杜佑, "『通典』 卷144. 卷146"
- 王圻, "續文獻通考』 卷110"
- 應劭, "『風俗通義』 卷6"
- 范曄, "『後漢書』 卷23"
- 何文 煥, "『歷代時話』卷24"
- 岸辺成雄, "唐代の樂器", pp.169~209 (1968), 東洋音樂學會編音樂之友社
- 조석연, "‘공무도하가’ 반주악기 공후(箜篌)의 기원과 형태 연구--사료를 중심으로", 음악과 문화, 0(18), pp.211~234 (2008), 세계음악학회
- 조석연, "진양 『악서』 공후의 세 종류 완목(腕木)에 관한 고찰", 동양예술, (25), pp.381~400 (2014), 한국동양예술학회
- 조석연, "해상 실크로드를 통한 궁형공후(Arched harp)의 전파와 접변", 공연문화연구, (30), pp.529~554 (2015), 한국공연문화학회
- 劉道廣, "中國古代藝術思想史", pp.178~ (1998), 上海人民出版社
- 古事熟語編纂委員會, "古事語源事典", pp.57~ (1977), 國典刊行會
- "국악대사전", pp.125~ (1984), 세광출판사
- "중국대백과전집", pp.347~348 (1989), 중국대백과전집출판
- "中國少數民族藝術詞典", pp.256~ (1991), 민족출판사
- "中國音樂詞典" (1986), 中國音樂書房
- 中國音樂文物大系总編輯部, "中國音樂文物大系 湖北卷", pp.173~ (1996), 大象出版社
- 中國音樂文物大系总編輯部, "中國音樂文物大系 甘肃卷", pp.246~ (1998), 大象出版社
- 大阪外國語大學朝鮮語硏究室, "朝鮮語大辭典 上卷" (1986), 角川書店
- 최남숙, "조선민족악기도감" (2001), 문학예술종합출판사
- "標準音樂事典" (1991), 세광음악출판사 사전편찬위원회
- 장사훈, "한국악기대관", pp.99~101 (1986), 서울대학교출판부
- 함화진, "조선악기이야기", 춘추, 2(6), pp.204~205 (1941), 조선춘추사