대중음악 금지곡 중 왜색과 표절의 관계 고찰: 비공개 심의원본자료를 중심으로
Study on the difference between Plagiarism and Japanese style in Popular Music Forbidden Songs : Focusing on the original review data
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since 1965, numerous forbidden songs have been designated. Plagiarism was the most common reason for prohibition. Many of the plagiarism songs were related to Japanese songs. Plagiarism is divided into melody and lyrics. However, this distinction was not made in the past disclosure data. So we did not know how the review of the plagiarism proceeded. The greatest number of forbidden songs were related with japanese style, but most of them were subsequently released. In the previous research, it was not known exactly what part of a song was plagiarized, and what the criteria of the ‘japane tyle’ was. In order to solve the problem, we examined the standard of judgment of plagiarism and japanes style through the investigation of original data. In the review original, the method of comparing the melody and the lyrics of the plagiarism and the original was taken. In the case of certain plagiarism song, it was designated without comparing the score. The Miyako-bushi scales became an important criterion for judging japanese style. In the case of the japanese style singing method(왜색), judges actually heard the music and judged it. All of the forbidden songs specified by subjective judgment were released. However, the adaptations or remade songs of Japanese songs were not. The banned japanese songs were a reflection of social demands at the time, and the designation of plagiarism protected the creators's copyrights in the period
Abstract
Since 1965, numerous forbidden songs have been designated. Plagiarism was the most common reason for prohibition. Many of the plagiarism songs were related to Japanese songs. Plagiarism is divided into melody and lyrics. However, this distinction was not made in the past disclosure data. So we did not know how the review of the plagiarism proceeded. The greatest number of forbidden songs were related with japanese style, but most of them were subsequently released. In the previous research, it was not known exactly what part of a song was plagiarized, and what the criteria of the ‘japane tyle’ was. In order to solve the problem, we examined the standard of judgment of plagiarism and japanes style through the investigation of original data. In the review original, the method of comparing the melody and the lyrics of the plagiarism and the original was taken. In the case of certain plagiarism song, it was designated without comparing the score. The Miyako-bushi scales became an important criterion for judging japanese style. In the case of the japanese style singing method(왜색), judges actually heard the music and judged it. All of the forbidden songs specified by subjective judgment were released. However, the adaptations or remade songs of Japanese songs were not. The banned japanese songs were a reflection of social demands at the time, and the designation of plagiarism protected the creators's copyrights in the period
참고문헌 (24)
- 국가기록원, "방송금지가요 가사철 제1호-450호, 문서철번호 DA0017382, 건번호 1-1", ~ (1987)
- 국가기록원, "방송금지가요 재심의 기획, 문서철번호 DA0017379, 건번호 1-1", ~ (1987)
- 국가기록원, "방송금지가요 재심의 결과, 문서철번호 DA0017379, 건번호 17-1", ~ (1987)
- 국가기록원, "방송금지 해제가요·통보, 문서철번호 DA0017379, 건번호 19-1", ~ (1987)
- 공연윤리위원회, "『공연윤리』, 1988년 1월호-1997년 9월호(제88호-244호)", ~
- 방송윤리위원회, "放送倫理審議便覽", ~ (1975)
- 방송윤리위원회, "『방송윤리』, 1966년 1월호-12월호(10월호는 결호)", ~
- 문옥배, "한국금지곡의 사회사" (2004), 예솔출판사
- 문옥배, "한국 공연예술 통제사" (2013), 예솔출판사
- 김은경, "유신체제의 음악통제양상에 관한 연구: 검열메커니즘과 금지곡을 중심으로", 민주주의와 인권, 11(2), pp.67~96 (2011), 5.18연구소
- 문옥배, "해방 이후 정부의 음악통제 연구", 음악논단, 22(22), pp.25~64 (2008), 음악연구소
- 송현민, "박정희 정권의 금지곡을 둘러싼 감시와 처벌", 문화과학, 73, pp.273~292 (2013), 문화과학사
- 권정구, "1975년 이후 한국대중음악의 규제에 대한 변화 양상", 박사, pp.2015
- 김은경, "박정희체제의 지배양식에 대한 비판적 연구 :음악정책을 중심으로", 박사, 정치외교학, pp.2010
- 박성재, "한국 대중가요의 정치 : 1970∼1990년대 지배와 저항의 동원", 석사, 언론정보학, pp.2005
- 야마모토 이사오, "일본대중문화의 개방정책과 유입실태의 변천에 관한 연구 : 영화·방송·대중 음악과 공연을 중심으로", 석사, 한국학, pp.2004
- 오오모리 타카시, "1960, 70년대 왜색문화 비판담론과 문화통제", 석사, 한국학협동과정, pp.2013
- 금수현, "왜색과 대중가요", 월간음악 (1985)
- 박성서, "마도로스 노래에 살고, 마도로스 노래에 죽다", News Maker (2017)
- 이영미, "뽕짝 시비는 끝나지 않았다", 음악동아 (1985)
- 조양욱, "왜색문화와 일본문화", 일본문화, (봄여름) (1992)
- 한국공연윤리위원회, "공연윤리 심의편람", 공연윤리위원회, ~ (1984)
- 일본대중문화 개방 영향 분석, "한국문화정책개발원", 한국문화정책개발원, ~ (2002)
- 한국방송 70년사 편찬위원회, "한국방송 70년사" (2007), 한국방송공사
