스피노자의 능동 정서로의 이행: 『나를 보내지마』에 나타난 포스트휴먼 윤리학
Revisiting Spinoza’s Affect: the Ethics of Posthuman in Never Let Me Go
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the ethical implications of affect, which is a cultural theory rooted in Spinoza's philosophy. Spinoza argued for a shift from passive to active affect, leading to a life free from bondage. Cultural studies have extensively investigated affect's interaction between body and mind, with Spinoza's affect concept as its foundation. Spinoza's theory of emotions has been revisited by cultural researchers, but its analysis in literary works remains challenging. This study aims to examine emotions through the reading of Never Let Me Go, confirming Spinoza's claim that active affect leads to freedom from bondage and submission. The ethical fulfillment of affect is intertwined with their workings, which cultural theorists view as ideological and political. By analyzing this, the study considers ethical pursuits and critiques the use of cloned humans as a means to human ends. The study is significant as it seeks to approach literary analysis using affect concepts from cultural theory and Spinoza's philosophy.
Abstract
This study explores the ethical implications of affect, which is a cultural theory rooted in Spinoza's philosophy. Spinoza argued for a shift from passive to active affect, leading to a life free from bondage. Cultural studies have extensively investigated affect's interaction between body and mind, with Spinoza's affect concept as its foundation. Spinoza's theory of emotions has been revisited by cultural researchers, but its analysis in literary works remains challenging. This study aims to examine emotions through the reading of Never Let Me Go, confirming Spinoza's claim that active affect leads to freedom from bondage and submission. The ethical fulfillment of affect is intertwined with their workings, which cultural theorists view as ideological and political. By analyzing this, the study considers ethical pursuits and critiques the use of cloned humans as a means to human ends. The study is significant as it seeks to approach literary analysis using affect concepts from cultural theory and Spinoza's philosophy.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김성호, "정동적 미메시스: 정동 순환의 매체로서의 소설", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (48), pp.14~38 (2020), 영미문학연구회[DOI]
- 그레그, 멜리사, "정동이론: 몸과 문화·윤리·정치의 마주침에서 생겨나는 것들에 대한 연구" (2015), 갈무리
- 내들러, 스티븐, "스피노자 : 철학을 도발한 철학자" (2011), 텍스트
- 마모루, 이토, "정동의 힘 : 미디어와 공진하는 신체" (2015), 갈무리
- 마수미, 브라이언, "가상계 : 운동, 정동, 감각의 아쌍블라주" (2011), 갈무리
- 마수미, 브라이언, "정동정치" (2018), 갈무리
- 박기순, "스피노자의 ‘자유로운 인간'—데카르트의 이원론에 대한 비판을 중심으로—", 동서인문학, 12(41), pp.55~72 (2008)
- 박여선, "종말적 정동의 서사를 비틀기: D.H.로런스의 『아포칼립스』", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (48), pp.67~99 (2020), 영미문학연구회[DOI]
- 스피노자, 바루흐, "윤리학"
- 이명호, "문화연구의 감정론적 전환을 위하여: 느낌의 구조와 정동경제론 검토", 비평과이론, 20(1), pp.113~139 (2015), 한국비평이론학회
- 이시구로, 가즈오, "나를 보내지마" (2009), 민음사
- 이종찬, "정동, 마음의 움직임", 문화과학, 86, pp.294~309 (2016)
- 조정환, "들뢰즈의 정동이론: 정동은 무엇을 할 수 있는가", 계간 파란, 3, pp.12~50 (2016)
- 진태원, "스피노자와 푸코: 또는 관계론의 철학(들)", 계간 시작, 13(2), pp.243~287 (2014)
- 함돈균, "한국문학사 또는 한국 현대시와 정동(affect) 담론의 양태들 - 주체화, 운동, 윤리학", 상허학보, 49, pp.71~105 (2017), 상허학회[DOI]
- 황정아, "자유주의의 정동으로서의 감상주의", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (48), pp.100~119 (2020), 영미문학연구회[DOI]
- Ahern, Stephen, "Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice: A Feel for the Text", pp.1~22 (2019), Palgrave
- Anderson, "The Affect Theory Reader", pp.161~185 (2010), Duke UP
- Brown, Steven D., "The Affect Theory Reader", pp.229~249 (2010), Duke UP
- Clough, Patricia T., "The Affect Theory Reader", pp.206~228 (2010), Duke UP
- Cooper, Melinda, "Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era" (2008), U of Washington P
- Figlerowicz, Marta, "Affect Theory Dossier: An Introduction", Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(2), pp.3~18 (2012)[DOI]
- Grossberg, Lawrence, "Emotions: A Cultural Studies Reader", pp.69~83 (2009), Routledge
- Ishiguro, Kazuo, "Never Let Me Go" (2005), Vintage
- Massumi, Brian, "The Politics of Affect" (2015), Polity P
- Shaddox, Karl., "Generic Considerations in Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go", Modern Fiction Studies, 56(4), pp.723~743 (2010)