플랫폼전략의 이익과 불이익 및 적용사례에 관한 연구
The Research of Gains and Losses of Platform Strategy and Implications through Case Studies
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 플랫폼전략에 대한 현황과 의의, 이익과 불이익, 적용사례에 따른 명제들을 도출하여 이론적 근거와 학문적 발전의 기초를 마련하고자 실시되었다. 플랫폼이 융합적 기술혁신시스템으로 발전됨으로써 시장규모가 증대되고, 분업이 확대되어 새로운 산업조직과 양면성시장(Two-side market)이 출현하게 된다. 또한 플랫폼은 핵심부품 공유범위 대상과 시점을 기준으로 4가지 유형의 플랫폼전략을 나타났으며, 전략적 유형별 이익과 불이익은 다르게 나타났다. 첫째, 사내 플랫폼전략에서 핵심부품 공유가 증가되면 개발공수가 낮아지게 되고, 개발비용도 낮아지는 반면 시장성과는 높아지게 된다. 반면 핵심부품 공유가 증가되면 차별화가 어렵게 되고, 개발공수가 높아져 시장성과는 낮아진다. 둘째, 사외 플랫폼전략의 공간적 범위에서 판매주체는 규모의 경제, 개발공수·개발비용 절감, 매출증대 효과를 가지는 반면 거래비용 증대에 따른 Hold-Up문제와 이중한계성의 매출감소가 나타났다. 기업경영 생태계에서 플랫폼전략은 디지털 통합현상으로 다양한 산업분야 에서 적용되었다. 인텔과 MS는 가치사슬의 핵심이 된 플랫폼에 의한 시장선점효과를 활용하고, 애플과 구글은 OS의 우수성을 근간으로 소비자가 직접 체험할 수 있는 어플리케이션 활성화에 초점을 두며, 페이스북은 오픈 플랫폼을 근간으로 새로운 응용 프로그램을 개발할 수 있는 지원시스템을 구축하였다. 반면 파나소닉은 제품차별화 추구, 개별용 LSI의 내․외부 판매병행이 특징이다. 이상의 사례를 통해 플랫폼전략의 확산 등을 비롯한 5가지 명제가 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 세계경영을 추구하고 있는 우리나라 기업경영 생태계에서 플랫폼전략의 효과적 수행은 새로운 성장 동력이 될 것임을 확인하였다. 이에 본 연구가 향후 플랫폼전략의 학문적 연구발전에 작은 밑거름이 되길 기대한다.
Abstract
The purposes of this study are to analyze the status and significance, gains and losses of platform strategy and provide the theoretical basis and academic development through the drawing implications on case studies. Platform has been increased the size of market, the expanding a division of labor, the emergence of a new industrial organization and the two-side market because of the development of fusion technology innovation system. Platform also showed four different types of platform strategy based on shared core components and the range of the target point and the gains and losses of these four different types of platform strategies were respectively. First, as the aspect of in-house platform strategy, if the sharing of a key component is increasing, the number of joint-development will be decreasing, lowing the cost of development and improving the market performances. Also, when the sharing of a key component is increasing, the product differentiation is very hard, the number of joint-development is raised and the market performances is lowed. Secondly, as the outside platform strategy in the spatial extent, sold subject takes an economies of scale, reduce the number of joint-development and the costs and the effect of increasing the sales profits, while dual limitation of transaction costs due to the increase of Hold-Up Problems and show a decrease in sales. Corporate management in the ecosystem, the phenomenon of digital integrated platform strategy has been applied in various industries. Intel and MS platform at the core of the value chain in the market by taking advantage of the first-mover advantage, Apple and Google focuses on enabling the application, which can be experienced directly by consumers as the basis for the superiority of the OS, the Facebook open platform support system as the basis to develop new applications that can be built. Panasonic is pursuing a product differentiation of the individual for LSI and internal·external sales in parallel. As seen in the cases, their platform strategies were to take advantage of economies of scale to reduce the cost of platform’s development. In addition, it also showed the effect of increased sales as well as to achieve sustainable revenue by maintaining loyal customers. Nevertheless, the limitations were raised because the losses of these 6 companies can not be evaluated in detail in this study. On the other hand, the five propositions can be evaluated the theoretical support because the business management aspects of technological change in the ecosystem appeared to be. However, the limitations identified because these five propositions could not be verified in detail. Thus, future research is the need to conduct a detailed verification in accordance with the hypothesis raised. Common theme appeared in 6 different cases determines the following that eventually benefit from the fierce competition platform strategy is the responsibility of the user. Excellent services and more integrated platforms are derived from the fierce competition. Global firms to ecosystem are seeking to establish meaningful and effective platform strategy that is possible. In this study, it is identified that an effective platform strategy will be a new growth engine in the Korean ecosystem, pursued global management. Nevertheless the lack of academic research for Korean firm’s cases and the lower practical usefulness of the platform strategy still remain a challenge. Therefore, the implications can be summarized as follows. First, it was predicted that the success of a platform to build influences corporate performance because of the spread of the IT platform competition. Weak corporate platform is die out from the competition or is more likely to be dependent on a leaded platform. Therefore, differentiation secures platform for the development and will need to be prepared for competition. Second, it evolves as a platform to build a competitive advantage based on the existing business, you will need to create new business opportunities. In other words, there is a need to find and nurture existing business activities, manufacturing, sales, service, and re-check the area of the platform painter. Inclined to minimize development costs and securing it through a variety of products that a lot of effort will need. Third, that will last as a suitable platform for the situation in the external environment and corporate strategy. If SMEs which lack the capacity to develop proprietary platforms by herself, there is a need to actively pursue the internal capabilities that can be integrated into one common platform business. In order to cope with that, the need for government and industry jointly a common platform, and SME development projects have been proposed. Detailed verifications, gains and losses of relationship and five propositions, are derived from this study unlike previous studies, but some limitations are also raised. Therefore, the need for future research to validate them. Nonetheless, this study is expected to be a small foundation for future research of platform strategy.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김창욱, "기업생태계와 플랫폼전략", SERI 연구보고서(삼성경제연구소), ~ (2012)
- 김창욱, "플랫폼전략의 이론과 실제, 성공사례 분석을 중심으로", SERI 이슈페이퍼(삼성경제연구소), ~ (2012)
- 류한석, "플랫폼 비즈니스와 소셜 플랫폼", 이슈와 트렌트(LG경제연구소), ~ (2011)
- 손상영, "플랫폼 경쟁이론의 정책적 시사점", KISDI 이슈리포트(정보통신정책연구원), ~ (2008)
- 송병선, "전략경영" (2010), 청람
- 윤상진, "플랫폼으로 진화중인 SNS, 소셜 플랫폼의 확대 전망", DigiEco Focus(KT 경제경영연구소), 1~21 (2011)
- 장재현, "플랫폼 천하평정을 향한 구글․애플․MS의 야망", LG Business Insight(LG 경제연구소), 2~15 (2010)
- 최병삼, "비즈니스 플랫폼의 부상과 시사점", CEO Information(삼성경제연구소), ~ (2011)
- "페이스북 마케팅-페이스북 플랫폼 커뮤니케이션 플로우" (2012), 한다은[URL]
- 한순구, "대한민국이 묻고 노벨경제학자가 답하다" (2012), 교보문고
- "네이버 지식사전"[URL]
- "위키백과"[URL]
- 今井賢一, "創造的破壊とは何か, 日本産業の再挑戦" (2008), 東洋經濟新報社
- 延岡健太郞, "マルチプロジェクト戰略" (1996), 有斐閣
- 三浦紗綾子, "ブラットフォ-ム戰略の論点", 一橋硏究(一橋大學), 36(4), pp.17~44 (2012)
- Barnett, M. L., "The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation., & Sustainability", Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), pp.88~90 (2006)
- Bendasat, I., "The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems", MIS Quarterly, pp.369~386 (1987)
- Cusumano, M. A., "Microsoft secret: How the World's Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets., & Manages People" (1995), Harvard Business School Press Books
- Desai, P., "Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design : Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers", Management Science, 47(1), pp.37~51 (2001)
- The Industrial Organization of Markets with Two- Sided Platforms, "Evans, D. S.", NBER, 56~58 (2005)
- Fransman, M., "The New ICT Ecosystem: Implication for Europe" (2007), Kokoro
- Gawer, A., "Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft., & Cisco Drive Industry Innovation" (2002), Harvard Business School Press Books
- Iansiti, M., "The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation., & Substantiality" (2004), Harvard Business School Press Books
- Meyer, M. H., "The Power of Product Platform: Building Value Cast Leadership" (1997), Free Press
- Milgrom, K., "Economics, Organization and Management" (1992), Prentice Hall
- Muffatto, M., "Introducing A Platform Strategy in Product Development", International Journal of Production Economics, special, 60, pp.61(3) (1999), 145~153
- Moore, J. F., "Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition", Harvard Business Review, 71(3), pp.75~86 (1993)
- Moore, J. F., "The Death of Competition" (1996), Haper Business
- Quatraro, F., "Martin Fransman: The New ICT Ecosystem. Implication for Europe", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(2), pp.321~328 (2010)
- Robertson, D., "Planning of Product Platforms", Sloan Management Review, (summer), pp.19~31 (1998)
- Sanderson, S., "Managing Product Families: The Case of the Sony Walkman", Research Policy, 24(5), pp.761~782 (1994)
- Yin, R. K., "Case Study Research: Design and Methods" (2009), Prentice Hall
