서비스 기업의 조직공정성, 사회자본, 지식공유 및 혁신행동의 관계에 관한 연구
The Relationship among Organizational Justice, Social Capital, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Behavior in Service Firms
0
조회
0
다운로드
59
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
서비스 품질이 서비스 접점에서 결정되기 때문에 서비스 접점 종사자들은 기업성과와 고객만족에 중요한 역할을 담당한다. 이러한 이유로 서비스 기업의 종사자들이 고객접점에서 창의적인 서비스를 하는 데 필요한 지식의 공유는 서비스 기업의 주요 관리 대상이지만 어려운 일이다. 따라서 서비스 기업의 종사자들이 필요한 지식을 다른 종사자들과 활발히 공유하기 위한 선행요인이 무엇인지 그리고 지식공유의 성과요인이 무엇인지에 관한 연구의 필요성이 제기된다. 본 연구의 목적은 서비스 기업의 조직공정성, 사회자본, 지식공유 및 혁신행동 간의 구조적 인과관계를 파악하는 것이다. 설문 응답의 신뢰성과 타당성을 제고하기 위해 설문조사원들이 38개의 서비스 기업을 직접 방문하여 회수한 492부의 설문지를 분석에 사용하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 첫째, 분배공정성은 지식의 기여에, 절차공정성은 지식의 습득에만 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 대인공정성과 정보공정성은 지식의 기여와 습득 모두에 영향을 미치는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 둘째, 구조자본과 관계자본은 지식의 기여에만 영향을 미치지만 지식의 습득에는 세 가지 사회자본 모두가 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 셋째, 지식의 기여와 습득 모두 혁신행동에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
Abstract
The members of a service firm play a key role in customer satisfaction and overall performance of the firm because customers assess the image of a service firm through their experiences with members of the firm and the quality of service provided is determined at each moment of truth. Therefore, it is very critical for a service firm to administer knowledge sharing to enable its members to make effective decisions at various moments of truth with customers. However, it is difficult to do so. Then, what makes active knowledge sharing among members enable and what are the outcomes from such activities? These questions raise a necessity of the research in the antecedents and consequences of knowledge sharing. The research used a survey questionnaire to validate the proposed research hypotheses and the questionnaire is structured in a self-report way to investigate the perceptions of the respondents. A total of 492 survey questionnaires from 38 companies were collected. The results of this study can be summarized as follows. Firstly, distributive justice only affects knowledge contribution while procedural justice affects knowledge acquisition. However, interpersonal justice and informational justice which represent interactional justice have positive effects on both knowledge contribution and acquisition. Secondly, structural capital and relationship capital affect knowledge contribution, but all types of social capital influence knowledge acquisition. The analysis has found that the factors of relational, structural and cognitive capital in order have had positive effects on knowledge contribution and acquisition. Lastly, both knowledge contribution and acquisition have positive effects on innovation behavior. The theoretical implications of this study are as follows. First, previous studies have been focused on analyzing knowledge sharing only in terms of either organizational justice or social capital as antecedents. To over come this problem, a comprehensive model has been constructed in this study because both factors, organizational justice and social capital, exist simultaneously in reality. Second, this study proposes a model to identify the structural relationship between antecedent and consequence factors by defining knowledge sharing as knowledge acquisition and knowledge contribution depending on the direction of knowledge exchange. Third, this study has contributed to help expand the research area on consequence factor from knowledge sharing. The model used in this study has been built in a way that identifies what enhances innovation behavior within a firm. Future direction of this study is as follows. Since independent variables and dependent variables are measured based on a self-report survey there might be possibility of common method bias. Therefore, the data needs to be collected from various sources such as colleagues or managers, or from different point of time. Second, the future research should include analysis from various perspectives because it is expected to show differences in social capital or organizational justice depending on types of service firms. Third, future research should investigate the correlation between organizational justice and innovation behavior, and corporate performance from members because improvement in performance and profitability is the ultimate goal of a firm. Fourth, this study has used a subjective indicator such as individual performance within a firm to measure the effects of knowledge acquisition and knowledge contribution. However, the development of the objective indicator that can explain knowledge acquisition and contribution will provide more meaningful explanations in the future.
참고문헌 (73)
- 강소라, "나와 우리를 위한 지식이전 이론:지식을 이전(Knowledge Transfer)하는 조직구성원의심리적 상태에 관한 근거이론적 접근", 경영학연구, 34(3), pp.739~781 (2005), 한국경영학회
- 김경재, "사회자본과 지식공유 관계에서 정보시스템 특성의 조절효과", 인적자원관리연구, 15(3), pp.1~18 (2008), 한국인적자원관리학회
- 김구, "공무원들의 성공적 지식이전의 영향요인에 관한 실증적 분석", 한국행정학보, 38(1), pp.45~68 (2004), 한국행정학회
- 김동주, "공정성 인식이 조직구성원들의 혁신적 행동에 미치는 영향 -지식공유의 매개효과를 중심으로-", 기업경영연구, 19(2), pp.237~258 (2012), 한국기업경영학회[DOI]
- 김문식, "자기주도학습능력과 지식공유의 관계에 대한개인의 목표지향성과 조직 특성의 조절 효과", 기업경영연구, 20(4), pp.249~271 (2013), 한국기업경영학회
- 김미숙, "서비스기업의 지식공유와 조직공정성, 사회자본 및 조직유효성 간의 관계", 박사, 경영학과, pp.2013
- 김미숙, "조직공정성이 사회적 자본과 지식공유에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 26(5), pp.1123~1148 (2013), 대한경영학회
- 김영목, "조직공정성이 구성원의 혁신적 행동과 직무성과에 미치는 영향 : 지식공유와 조직·상사지원인식의 매개효과", 박사, 경영학과, pp.2012
- 김태구, "호텔의 서비스 혁신성 및 경영성과 선행요인으로서사회자본과 지식공유- 기업의 자원기반관점 -", 관광학연구, 34(7), pp.13~36 (2010), 한국관광학회
- 김혁동, "학교조직의 공정성과 구성원간의 신뢰가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 한국교육논단, 9(2), pp.155~178 (2010), 한국교육포럼(아시아태평양교육학회)
- 문인오, "간호사의 지식공유가 혁신행동과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 간호행정학회지, 11(2), pp.173~183 (2005), 간호행정학회
- 박문수, "집단간 지식공유의 영향요인에 관한 연구", 지식경영연구, 5(2), pp.1~23 (2004), 한국지식경영학회
- 박희태, "조직 공정성이 구성원의 지식공유에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 40(2), pp.485~521 (2011), 한국경영학회
- 배병렬, "Amos 17.0 구조방정식모델링-원리와 실제" (2009), 도서출판 청람
- 성기문, "지식교환 웹사이트에서 개인특성과 사용자 관여가 지식공유행위에 미치는 영향", 한국전자거래학회지, 14(4), pp.229~253 (2009), 한국전자거래학회
- 손슬옹, "비정규직의 직무불안이 정보공유와 ORB의 미치는 영향", 석사, 경영학, pp.2012
- 이도열, "지식자산, 지식공유, 조직유효성의 관계에 관한 연구", 박사, 경영학, pp.2007
- 이영현, "기업의 사회적 자본이 지식활동에 미치는 영향", 고용직업능력개발연구, 11(1), pp.119~141 (2008), 한국직업능력개발원
- 이홍재, "공공부문에서의 지식기여 영향요인에 관한 연구", 정보관리학회지, 27(3), pp.169~187 (2010), 한국정보관리학회
- 장용선, "사회적 자본의 지각이 지식활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 금융기관을 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 30(1), pp.59~91 (2006), 한국인사관리학회
- 정갑연, "한국 내 해외자회사 시장지향성이 현지시장 지식획득 및 성과에 미치는 영향: 흡수능력의 역할을 중심으로", 기업경영연구, 20(6), pp.323~352 (2013), 한국기업경영학회
- 정재훤, "온라인 지식네트워크 내에서의 지식기여 및 지식활용 활동에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국경영과학회지, 34(3), pp.1~27 (2009), 한국경영과학회
- 조순옥, "공과대학 재학생들의 사회적 자본이 지식공유에 미치는 영향에 관한 분석", 직업교육연구, 30(3), pp.147~173 (2011), 한국직업교육학회
- 허문구, "사회적 자본이 지식창출과 혁신에 미치는 영향", 인사조직연구, 19(1), pp.41~73 (2011), 한국인사조직학회
- 홍기환, "인사고과에 대한 수용도가 조직학습에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 석사, 인력관리학, pp.2011
- Ambrose. M., "Organization Structure as a Moderator of the Relationship between Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice, Perceived Organizational Support, and Supervisory Trust", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), pp.295~305 (2003)
- Barney, J., "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99~120 (1991)
- Bell, G. G., "Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow", Organization Science, 18(6), pp.955~972 (2007)
- Bock, G. W., "Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing : Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate", MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.87~111 (2005)
- Cabrera, A., "Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas", Organization Studies, 23(5), pp.687~710 (2002)
- Calantone, R. J., "Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance", Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), pp.515~524 (2002)
- Chia, H. B., "Governing and Managing Knowledge in Asia", pp.305~347 (2005), World Scientific
- Chiu, C. M., "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities : An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories", Decision Support Systems, 42(3), pp.1872~1888 (2006)
- Chow, W. S., "Social Network, Social Trust and Shared Goals in Organizational Knowledge Sharing", Information & Management, 45(7), pp.458~465 (2008)
- Colquitt, J. A., "Justice at the Millennium : A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), pp.425~445 (2001)
- Cope III, R. F., "Effective Project Management : A Knowledge Management and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Approach", Journal of Business & Economics Research, 5(9), pp.53~62 (2007)
- Cropanzano, R., "Social Exchange Theory : An Interdisciplinary Review", Journal of Management, 31(6), pp.874~900 (2005)
- Cropanzano, R., "Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice", Group and Organizational Management, 27(3), pp.324~351 (2002)
- Dyer, J. H., "Creating and Managing High Performance Knowledge Sharing Networks : The Toyota Case", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.345~368 (2000)
- Fang, Y. H., "In Justice We Trust : Exploring Knowledge-Sharing Continuance Intentions in Virtual Communities of Practice", Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), pp.235~246 (2010)
- Fassina, N. E., "Meta-Analytic tests of Relationships between Organizational Justice and Citizenship Behavior : Testing Agent-System and Shared-Variance Models", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(6), pp.805~828 (2008)
- Folger, R., "Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management" (1998), Sage
- Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
- Greenberg, J., "Stealing in the Name of Justice : Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(1), pp.81~103 (1993)
- Homans, G. C., "Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms" (1961), Harcourt, Brace & World
- Hu, M. M., "Hospitality Teams: Knowledge Sharing and Service Innovation Performance", Tourism Management, 30(1), pp.41~50 (2009)
- Janssen, O., "Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), pp.287~302 (2000)
- Kang, K., "An Empirical Study of the Effects of Social Capital on Inter-Firm Knowledge Transfer and Innovation Performance, Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering", 2009 International Conference on IEEE, 2, pp.414~417 (2009)
- Kogut, B., "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology", Organization Science, 3(3), pp.383~397 (1992)
- Kostova, T., "Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practice : A Contextual Perspective", Academy of Management Review, 24(2), pp.308~324 (1999)
- Liao, H., "The Impact of Justice Climate and Justice Orientation on Work Outcomes : A Cross-Level Multifoci Framework", Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), pp.242~256 (2005)
- Lin, C. P., "To Share or Not to Share : Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents", Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), pp.411~428 (2007)
- Lind, E. A., "The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice" (1988), Plenum Press
- McEvily, B., "Trust as an Organizing Principle", Organization Science, 14(1), pp.91~103 (2003)
- Nahapiet, J., "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242~266 (1998)
- Nonaka, I., "The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Nonaka, I., "The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.3~54 (1998)
- Portes, A., "Social capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Society", Annual Reviews of Sociology, 24(1), pp.1~24 (1998)
- Quinetta, M., "Understanding the Motivational Effects of Procedural and Informational Justice in Feedback Processes", British Journal of Psychology, 97, pp.281~298 (2006)
- Roch, S. G., "Organizational Justice in an Exchange Framework : Clarifying Organizational Justice Distinctions", Journal of Management, 32(2), pp.299~322 (2006)
- Schepers, P., "Social Factors of Work-Environment Creativity", Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), pp.407~428 (2007)
- Scott, G. G., "Determinants of Innovative Behavior : A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace", Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.580~607 (1994)
- Skarlicki, D. P., "When Explanations for Layoffs Are Not Enough : Employer's Integrity as a Moderator of the Relationship between Informational Justice and Retaliation", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(1), pp.123~146 (2008)
- Srivastava, A., "Empowering Leadership in Management Teams : Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, and Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), pp.1239~1251 (2006)
- Tsai, W., "Social Capital and Value Creation : The Role of Intrafirm Networks", Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), pp.464~476 (1998)
- van den Hooff, B., "Knowledge Sharing in Context : The Influence of Organizational Commitment, Communication Climate and CMC Use on Knowledge Sharing", Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), pp.117~130 (2004)
- van den Hooff, B., "Managing Knowledge Sharing : Emergent and Engineering Approaches", Information & Management, 46(1), pp.1~8 (2009)
- Wasko, M. M., "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice", MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.35~57 (2005)
- Watson, S., "A Multi-Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations : Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse", Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), pp.141~173 (2006)
- Wright, C, W., "Procedural Justice, Mood, and Prosocial Personality Influence on Organizational Citizenship Behavior", North American Journal of Psychology, 10(2), pp.397~412 (2008)
- Yang, S. B., "Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer in the Buyer-Supplier Relationship: A Buyer’s Perspective", System Sciences 2007HICSS 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE, pp.188~188 (2007)
- Zheng, W., "A Social Capital Perspective of Innovation from Individuals to Nations:Where Is Empirical Literature Directing Us?", aInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), pp.151~183 (2010)
- Zolfagharian, M. A., "Consumer Perceptions of Service Innovativeness and Personal Control", Services Marketing Quarterly, 31(1), pp.89~105 (2009)
