본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주관적 사회경제적 지위가 직무성과 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: LMX와 CWX의 매개효과

The Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Job: Performance and Organizational Commitment Mediating Effects of LMX and CWX

심덕섭|양동민
한국기업경영학회 (Korean Corporation Management Association)|2021.06|기업경영연구 (Korean Corporation Management Review)|제28권 제3호|pp. 105-128

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

조직몰입Organizational Commitment직무성과Job PerformanceLMX주관적 사회경제적 지위Subjective Socioeconomic StatusCWX
주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구는 주관적 사회경제적 지위가 직무성과 및 조직몰입에 미치는 직접효과와 함께 주관적 사회경제적지위와 직무성과, 주관적 사회경제적 지위와 조직몰입 간의 관계에서 LMX(Leader-Member Exchange)와CWX(Coworker Exchange)의 매개효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 설정한 가설 검증을 위해 국내 소재기업 303명의 종업원 설문자료를 활용하였다. 실증연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 주관적 사회경제적 지위는직무성과 및 조직몰입에 정(+)의 영향을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, LMX는 사회경제적 지위와 직무성과, 사회경제적 지위와 조직몰입 간의 관계를 완전 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, CWX는 사회경제적지위와 직무성과 간의 관계를 완전 매개하는 한편, 사회경제적 지위와 조직몰입 간의 관계를 부분 매개하는것으로 나타났다. 연구결과를 토대로 연구의 의의 및 시사점, 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.

Abstract

Recently there are conflict among social class due to social injustice and polarization. Though many previous re￾searchers have tried to examine these kinds of phenomenon through socioeconomic status. they have focused on objective socioeconomic status. Unlike objective socioeconomic status, approach of subjective socioeconomic status can explain more fluently employees’ attitude and performance in organization. The purpose of this research is to test the effects of subjective socioeconomic status on job performance and organizational commitment. Also, we attempt to verify the mediating effects of LMX and CWX on the relationships between subjective socioeconomic status and job performance, and between socioeconomic status and organizational commitment. Based on prior research, we derives following hypotheses. H1: Subjective socioeconomic status will be positively related to LMX. H2: Subjective socioeconomic status will be positively related to CWX. H3: LMX will be positively related to job performance. H4: LMX will be positively related to organizational commitment. H5: CWX will be positively related to job performance. H6: CWX will be positively related to organizational commitment. H7: LMX will mediate the relationship between Subjective socioeconomic status and job performance. H8: LMX will mediate the relationship between Subjective socioeconomic status and organizational commitment. H9: CWX will mediate the relationship between Subjective socioeconomic status and job performance. H10: CWX will mediate he relationship between Subjective socioeconomic status and organizational commitment. To examine the proposed hypotheses in this study, we have collected 311 data from employees in eight organizations, after process of excluding unanswered items questionnaires, 303 employees data is used for analysis finally. We examined the H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 through multiple regression analysis. And bootstrapping regression analysis is used to examine the mediating effects of Subjective socioeconomic status(H7, H8, H9, and H10). The major findings are as follows: 1) subjective socioeconomic status is positively associated with LMX. 2) subjective socioeconomic status is positively associated with CWX. 3) LMX is positively associated with job performance. 4) LMX is positively associated with organizational commitment. 5) CWX is positively associated with job performance. 6) CWX is positively associated with organizational commitment. 7) LMX fully mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and job performance. 8) LMX fully mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and organizational commitment. 9) CWX fully mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and job performance. 10) CWX partially mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and organizational commitment. Based on these results, theoretical and practical implications were provided, and direction for future research are discussed.

참고문헌 (85)

  1. 강영순, "LMX의 질과 조직몰입및 조직시민행동간 리더행동의 조절효과", 조직과인사관리연구, 25, pp.349~374 (2001)
  2. 권오형, "장애인 임금 근로자의 주관적 사회경제적 지위가 일상생활 만족도에 미치는 영향 - 자아존중감의 매개효과와 정규직여부의 조절효과 분석 중심으로-", 장애와 고용, 25(4), pp.297~319 (2015), 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원[DOI]
  3. 김병조, "한국인 주관적 계층의식의 특성과 결정요인", 한국사회학, 34(SUM), pp.241~268 (2000)
  4. 김수린, "청소년의 객관적·주관적 사회경제적 지위와신체건강의 관계", 박사, pp.2017
  5. 김영주, "불평등의 심리적 영향에 관한 경험 연구 개관: 경제적 불평등을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지:일반, 37(3), pp.313~347 (2018), 한국심리학회[DOI]
  6. 김재우, "한국인의 주관적 사회계층, 기회공정성 인식, 그리고 삶의 만족도: 성별･연령집단별 매개과정과 조절작용", 행정논총, 57(4), pp.97~127 (2019), 한국행정연구소[DOI]
  7. 김현아, "LMX의 질, 자아개념, 조직유효성간의 관계 연구", 조직과 인사관리연구, 28(4) (2004), 한국인사관리학회
  8. 박노윤, "사회적 교환과 경제적 교환 - 고용지위, 조직지원인식, 리더-부하직원의 관계, 목표지향성의 영향 -", 기업경영연구, 16(2), pp.79~107 (2009), 한국기업경영학회
  9. 박상언, "감정부조화의 영향과 그 조절요인에 관한 실증연구: 직무자율성과 사회적 지원의 조절효과를 중심으로", 경영학연구, 38(2), pp.379~405 (2009), 한국경영학회
  10. 양동민, "조직공정성 지각이 심리적 계약위반, 조직몰입 및 일탈행동에 미치는 영향 : LMX 및 CWX의 조절효과 검증", 기업경영연구, 27(6), pp.23~53 (2020), 한국기업경영학회
  11. 유계숙, "주관적 사회계층 인식이 상대적 박탈감과 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향: 수저담론 기반 귀속의식의 실증 분석 연구", Human Ecology Research, 57(3), pp.329~340 (2019), 대한가정학회[DOI]
  12. 윤석범, "LMX와 조직시민행동의 관계에서 내재적 동기부여의 매개역할", 기업경영연구, 24(1), pp.1~17 (2017), 한국기업경영학회
  13. 윤인진, "사회경제적 지위와 주관적 계층의식이 생활만족에 미치는 영향 -고급여가활용의 매개효과분석-", 도시행정학보, 21(2), pp.153~185 (2008), 한국도시행정학회
  14. 이상구, "소방공무원의 직무스트레스 유발원인과 결과에 관한 실증적 연구: 직무특성, 역할혼돈, 동료관계와 조직몰입을 중심으로", 한국화재소방학회 논문지, 21(2), pp.74~86 (2007), 한국화재소방학회
  15. 이연경, "사회계층이 행복에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 객관적 계층과 주관적 계층의식을 중심으로", 행정논총, 55(1), pp.1~39 (2017), 한국행정연구소
  16. 이지우, "중소기업의 혁신성에 관한 탐색적 연구", 중소기업연구, 24(2), pp.8~210 (2002), 한국중소기업학회
  17. 조순래, "노인복지시설 리더-구성원 교환관계가 종사자의 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 - 동료관계 질의 매개효과를 중심으로 -", 공공사회연구, 10(2), pp.29~62 (2020), 한국공공사회학회[DOI]
  18. 지평기, "리더-구성원 교환관계(LMX) 이론의 국내 연구 동향과 향후과제 : 최근 10년간 경영학 분야 주요 학술지를 중심으로", 대한경영학회지, 33(2), pp.305~340 (2020), 대한경영학회
  19. 최미경, "중년성인의 우울과 무력감, 사회적 지지 및 사회경제적 상태", 정신간호학회지, 19(2), pp.196~204 (2010), 한국정신간호학회
  20. 최정민, "노인의 사회경제적 지위와 우울감과의 관계: 가족관계의 매개효과를 중심으로", 한국웰니스학회지, 10(4), pp.235~247 (2015), 한국웰니스학회
  21. 호민, "직원의 개인-직무 적합성, 직무열의, 동료교환관계가 동료 직무열의에 미치는 영향", 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지, 30(3), pp.283~305 (2016), 한국생산성학회[DOI]
  22. 황지영, "주관적 계층의식이 음주문제에 미치는 영향: 스트레스의 매개효과", 정신건강과 사회복지, 44(3), pp.238~265 (2016), 한국정신건강사회복지학회
  23. Adler, N. E., "Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning : Preliminary data in healthy white women", Health Psychology, 19, pp.586~592 (2000)
  24. Bauer, T. N., "Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange", pp.3~9 (2015), Oxford University Press
  25. Blanden, J., "Cross-country rankings in intergenerational mobility : A comparison of approaches from economics and sociology", Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(1), pp.38~73 (2013)
  26. Boyce, C. J., "Money and happiness : Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction", Psychological Science, 21(4), pp.471~475 (2010)
  27. Brandt, M. J., "Changes in income predict change in social trust : A longitudinal analysis", Political Psychology, 36(6), pp.761~768 (2015)
  28. Callan, M. J., "The interrelations between social class, personal relative deprivation, and prosociality", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), pp.660~669 (2017)
  29. Callan, M. J., "Predicting self-rated mental and physical health : The contributions of subjective socioeconomic status and personal relative deprivation", Frontiers in Psychology, 6, pp.1~14 (2015)
  30. Campbell, K. E., "Social resources and socioeconomic status", Social Networks, 8(1), pp.97~117 (1986)
  31. Chiaburu, D. S., "Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), pp.1082~1103 (2008)
  32. Cole, M. S., "The workplace social exchange network : A multilevel, conceptual examination", Group &Organization Management, 27(1), pp.142~167 (2002)
  33. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., "The employee–organization relationship : Where do we go from here", Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), pp.166~179 (2007)
  34. Cundiff, J. M., "Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? : A meta-analysis", Health Psychology : Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, 36(12), pp.1109~1125 (2017)
  35. Dollard, M. F., "Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), pp.579~599 (2010)
  36. Falk, A., "A city-wide experiment on trust discrimination", Journal of Public Economics, 100, pp.15~27 (2013)
  37. Graen, G., "Japanese career progress : An empirical examination", Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), pp.148~161 (2006)
  38. Graen, G., "Relationship-based approach to leadership : Development of leader-member exchange(LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years : Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective", The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), pp.219~247 (1995)
  39. Grandey, A. A., "Emotional regulation in the workplace : A new way to conceptualize emotional labor", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), pp.95~110 (2000)
  40. Greitemeyer, T., "Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression : A test of the theory of social deprivation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), pp.178~194 (2016)
  41. Greitemeyer, T., "Increasing wealth inequality may increase interpersonal hostility : The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression", The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(6), pp.766~776 (2017)
  42. Han, J., "Social capital, socioeconomic status and self-efficacy", Applied Economics and Finance, 2(1), pp.1~10 (2015)
  43. Harrison, D. A., "How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences", Academy of Management Journal, 49, pp.305~325 (2006)
  44. Hooker, E. D., "Subjective socioeconomic status matters less when perceived social support is high : A study of cortisol responses to stress", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), pp.981~989 (2018)
  45. Howell, R. T., "The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries : A meta-analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), pp.536~560 (2008)
  46. Johnson, W., "How money buys happiness : Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), pp.680~691 (2006)
  47. Kozlowski, S. W., "Integration of climate and leadership : Examination of a neglected issue", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), pp.546~553 (1989)
  48. Kraus, M. W., "Handbook of well-being Noba Scholar handbook series, Subjective Well-Being", pp.1~10 (2018)
  49. Kraus, M. W., "A road map for an emerging psychology of social class", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), pp.642~656 (2012)
  50. Leana, C. R., "Perspective-organizational behavior and the working poor", Organization Science, 23(3), pp.888~906 (2012)
  51. Li, J., "How do socioeconomic status relate to social relationships among adolescents : A school-based study in East China", BMC Pediatrics, 20, pp.1~10 (2020)
  52. Liao, F. Y., "Team-member exchange and work engagement : Does personality make a difference", Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(1), pp.63~77 (2013)
  53. McCarthy, J., "Anxiety in the workplace can lead to lower job performance" (2015), American Psychological Association
  54. Meyer, J. P., "Commitment to organizations and occupations : Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), pp.538~551 (1993)
  55. Navarro-Carrillo, G., "Socioeconomic status and psychological well-being : Revisiting the role of subjective socioeconomic status", Frontiers in Psychology, 11, pp.1~15 (2020)
  56. Ng, T. W., "Subjective career success : A meta-analytic review", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(2), pp.169~179 (2014)
  57. Ng, T. W., "Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes : A meta-analysis", Group & Organization Management, 33(3), pp.243~268 (2008)
  58. Oakes, J. M., "The measurement of SES in health research : Current practice and steps toward a new approach", Social Science & Medicine, 56(4), pp.769~784 (2003)
  59. Piff, P. K., "Social class and prosocial behavior : Current evidence, caveats, and questions", Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, pp.6~10 (2017)
  60. Pitesa, M., "Workplace trust as a mechanism of employee(dis)advantage : The case of employee socioeconomic status", Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, pp.83~101 (2017)
  61. Podsakoff, P. M., "Self-reports in organizational research : Problems and prospects", Journal of Management, 12(4), pp.531~544 (1986)
  62. Preacher, K. J., "SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), pp.717~731 (2004)
  63. Price, J. L., "The study of turnover" (1977), Iowa State Press
  64. Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., "High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy", International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), pp.1~11 (2019)
  65. Schaufeli, W. B., "How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), pp.893~917 (2009)
  66. Seers, A., "Team-member exchange quality : A new construct for role-making research", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), pp.118~135 (1989)
  67. Settoon, R. P., "Social exchange in organizations : Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity", Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, pp.219~227 (1996)
  68. Sherony, K. M., "Coworker exchange : Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), pp.542~548 (2002)
  69. Singh-Manoux, A., "Subjective social status : Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study", Social Science & Medicine, 56(6), pp.1321~1333 (2003)
  70. Snibbe, A. C., "You can't always get what you want : Educational attainment, agency, and choice", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), pp.703~720 (2005)
  71. Snyder, C. R., "Hope theory : Rainbows in the mind", Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), pp.249~275 (2002)
  72. Sparrowe, R. T., "Process and structure in leader-member exchange", Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp.522~552 (1997)
  73. Stamos, A., "Investigating the effect of childhood socioeconomic background on interpersonal trust : Lower childhood socioeconomic status predicts lower levels of trust", Personality and Individual Differences, 145, pp.19~25 (2019)
  74. Stephens, N. M., "Social class culture cycles : How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality", Annual Review of Psychology, 65, pp.611~634 (2014)
  75. Turner, R. J., "Social support and social structure : A descriptive epidemiology", Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(3), pp.193~212 (1994)
  76. Van de Ven, A. H., "Measuring and assessing organizations" (1980), Wiley
  77. Vanneman, R., "The American perception of class" (1987), Temple University Press
  78. Vonneilich, N., "The mediating effect of social relationships on the association between socioeconomic status and subjective health-results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall cohort study", BMC Public Health, 12(1), pp.1~11 (2012)
  79. Waters, E., "Double disadvantage : The influence of ethnicity over socioeconomic position on childhood overweight and obesity : Findings from an inner urban population of primary school children", International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 3(4), pp.196~204 (2008)
  80. Werang, B. R., "The effect of teachers’ socioeconomic status on elementary schools’ life in Indonesia : An empirical study in the elementary schools of Merauke district, Papua", International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 6(1), pp.23~37 (2017)
  81. White, K. R., "The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement", Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), pp.461~481 (1982)
  82. Williams, L. J., "Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors", Journal of Management, 17(3), pp.601~617 (1991)
  83. Yammarino, F. J., "Leadership and levels of analysis : A state-of-the-science review", The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6), pp.879~919 (2005)
  84. Yang, Y., "Hope and creative self-efficacy as sequential mediators in the relationship between family socioeconomic status and creativity", Frontiers in Psychology, 11, pp.438~ (2020)
  85. Yilmaz, C., "Salesperson cooperation : The influence of relational, task, organizational, and personal factors", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), pp.335~357 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

LMXSC가 조직몰입 및 일탈행동에 미치는 영향: 지각된 상사 지위의 조절효과 검증박동건, 손은율, 최명옥한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2011 · 제24권 제4호조직구성원의 리더-구성원 교환관계(LMX), 직원몰입, 직무성과 간의 구조적 관계: 심리적 임파워먼트의 조건부 간접효과김미화, 이수진한국실천공학교육학회 · 실천공학교육논문지2024 · 제16권 제5호직무관여와 조직몰입의 관계: 상사-부하 교환관계(LMX)의 질, 조직지원인식의 조절효과김용호, 신강현, 이종현사회과학연구소 · 지역과 세계2016 · 제40권 제2호LMX와 직무성과의 관계: 직원몰입 잠재프로파일을 매개로 한 직·간접효과 분석이수진, 정혜경한국평생교육ㆍHRD연구소 · 평생교육 · HRD연구2025 · 제21권 제4호리더-구성원 교환관계가 심리적 임파워먼트와 조직몰입에 미치는 영향이규만, 최준희대한경영정보학회 · 경영과 정보연구2012 · 제31권 제4호조직공정성 지각이 심리적 계약위반, 조직몰입 및 일탈행동에 미치는 영향 : LMX 및 CWX의 조절효과 검증심덕섭, 양동민한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2020 · 제27권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

소비자 문제해결 창구 인식이 지속가능 소비생활에 미치는 영향: 소비자 권리와 책임 행동과 소비생활 여건 인식의 효과박승배, 홍재원pp. 1-19한·중 상장기업의 유상증자유형선택 결정요인에 관한 비교연구학가흠, 주현태, 이준규pp. 21-34중국 정부의 보조금과 하이테크기업 성과의 관계: 연구개발투자의 매개효과와 합법성의 조절효과를 중심으로류우함, 유재욱pp. 35-57남용적리더십이 구성원의 수동공격성에 미치는 영향: 심리적계약위반과 분노반추의 직렬다중매개를 중심으로신제구, 구자규pp. 59-83수출업자의 공감능력이 문화적 역량 및 문화 간 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향정갑연pp. 85-104
원문 보기