창의적 리더십이 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무만족 및 구성원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 -서비스기업을 중심으로-
Effects of Creative Leadership and Psychological Empowerment, Job Satisfaction and Innovative Behavior in Service Firms
0
조회
0
다운로드
80
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 최근 급변하는 경영환경에서 기업이 지속적인 경쟁우위를 달성하는데 있어 중요한 개념인 혁신에 관한 연구로 리더십의 관점에서 접근하였다. 따라서 연구의 목적은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 창의적 리더십에 대해 고찰하고 창의적 리더십과 혁신행동과의 관계를 검정한다. 둘째, 창의적 리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트 및 직무만족과의 관계를 검정한다. 셋째, 심리적 임파워먼트 및 직무만족과 구성원의 혁신행동간의 관계에 대해 고찰한다. 이상의 연구목적을 통해 기업이 지속적인 경쟁우위를 달성하기 위한 전략적 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 이러한 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 서울 경기에 위치한 서비스기업의 임직원 259명의 표본을 대상으로 SPSS 12.0과 AMOS 5.0을 통하여 신뢰성분석, 요인분석, 상관분석, 경로분석 등을 통해 본 연구에서 설정한 연구가설을 검정하였다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 학문적 시사점을 제시할 수 있다. 조직구성원의 혁신행동에 직접적으로 영향을 미치는 선행요인으로 심리적 임파워먼트, 직무만족과 창의적 리더십을 제시하였다. 창의적 리더십은 혁신행동에 상대적으로 적은 영향력을 미치지만 심리적 임파워먼트, 직무만족에 큰 영향을 미치는 선행변수로 중요한 의미를 갖는다고 할 수 있다(
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of the relationships between creative leadership, psychological empowerment(meaning, competence, self-determination, impact), job satisfaction and innovative behavior. For these purposes, the authors has developed several hypotheses as follows: H-1: The creative leadership is associated with the innovative behavior of employer. H-2: The creative leadership is associated with the psychological empowerment of employer. H-3: The creative leadership is associated with the job satisfaction of employer. H-4: The psychological empowerment is associated with the job satisfaction of employer. H-5: The psychological empowerment is associated with the innovative behavior of employer. H-6: The job satisfaction is associated with the Innovative Behavior of employer. Data has been collected from 259 respondents for this study using a questionnaire method. The survey for the actual analysis of the research was done and analyzed with the employer at 3 firms in Seoul, Korea. The positive analysis was done with SPSS 12.0K statistics package and visual PLS program using the analysis techniques of frequency analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and factor analysis. In addition, structural equation modeling was conducted using AMOS 5.0. The data was analyzed by frequency analysis using SPSS 12.0 and structural equation modeling using AMOS 5.0. The result of the overall model analysis is as follows: Chi-Square = 378.306, d.f. = 107, p-value = 0.0, GFI = .904, AGFI = 0.863, IFI = 0.939, NFI = 0.917, RMSEA = 0.079, TLI = 0.922. The results of the overall model analysis were coherent. The following study results were revealed: First, creative leadership was related positively to psychological empowerment, job satisfaction and innovative behavior. Second, psychological empowerment was related positively to job satisfaction and innovative behavior. Finally, job satisfaction was related positively to innovative behavior. Based on the results, the study offers strategic implications for human resource management in firms. Looking from these results of the study, it was found out that employer’ innovation behavior can be increased when firms members demonstrate their creative leadership indirectly through methods members recognize organization justice higher and through methods promoting organization psychology empowerment of members instead of directly exercising their creative leadership on managers for increasing members’ innovation behavior.
참고문헌 (49)
- 김성국, "조직혁신의 선행요인에 관한 이론적 연구", 경영논총, 16(1), pp.79~92 (1998), 이화여자대학교 경영연구소
- 김원인, "관광호텔의 리더십 유형에 따른 조직성과 연구", 관광학연구, 15(2), pp.113~134 (2000), 대한관광경영학회
- 김일천, "혁신적 업무행동의 선행요인에 관한 연구", 경영연구, 19(2), pp.281~316 (2004), 한국산업경영학회
- 박원우, "한국내 임파워먼트의 사례를 통해 본 서구 경영개념의 도입과 확산과정", 경영학연구, 30(4), pp.1265~1289 (1997), 한국경영학회
- 송병식, "직무특성과 혁신행동간 창의성의 매개효과에 대한 탐색적 연구", 대한경영학회지, 18(4), pp.1483~1503 (2005), 대한경영학회
- 손은일, "셀프리더십과 혁신행동과의 관계에서 상사신뢰의 매개효과에 관한 연구", 대한안전경영과학회지, 10(4), pp.275~286 (2008), 대한안전경영과학회
- 유시정, "리더십 유형이 임파워먼트, 직무태도, 서비스 품질에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 서비스경영학회지, 7(4), pp.3~27 (2006), 한국서비스경영학회
- 유향자, "부하특성,LMX질,임파워먼트,그리고 혁신행동간의 관계", 석사, pp.2006
- 이덕로, "변혁적⋅거래적 리더십이 부하의 추가노력,직무만족 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 인사관리연구, 18(1), pp.167~191 (1994)
- 이문선, "창의성과 혁신행동의 관계와 집단특성의 조절효과", 조직과 인사관리연구, 27(1), pp.1~22 (2003), 한국인사관리학회
- 이지우, "심리적 임파워먼트와 조직지원이 종합병원 직원들의 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향", 보건행정학회지, 13(1), pp.46~68 (2003), 한국보건행정학회
- 이화용, "변혁적 리더십이 조직의 유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 조직과 인사관리연구, 28(4), pp.4~317 (2004), 한국인사관리학회
- 임준철, "부하에 의해 인지된 상사의 변혁적 및 거래적 리더십이 부하의 혁신성향에 미치는 영향(자기권능감의 매개역할을 중심으로)", 인사조직연구, 7(1), pp.1~42 (1999), 인사조직학회
- 장재윤, "창의적 리더의 4가지 역할", 한국산업 및 조직심리학회 추계학술대회 및 심포지움 발표논문집, pp.27~46 (2006)
- 최만기, "조직혁신에 관한 연구모형의 개발과 연구명제의 설정", 경영학연구, 27(5), pp.1331~1360 (1999), 한국경영학회
- Amabile, T. M., "A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations", in Organization Behavior, 15(1), pp.187~209 (1998)
- Bennis, W. G., "On Becoming a Leader" (1994), Perseus Books
- Chebat, J. C., "The Impact of Empowerment on Customer, Contact Employees’ Roles in Service Organizations", Journal of Service Research, 3(1), pp.66~ (2000)
- Conkel, D., "The Labor Crunch in the Hospitality Industry: a Question of Supply and Demand" (1988), Executive Housekeeping Today
- Conger, J. A., "The Empowerment Process; Integrating Theory and Practice", Academy of Management Review, 13(2), pp.470~484 (1988)
- Damanpour, F., "Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of Organizational Lag", 29Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), pp.392~409 (1984)
- Drucker, P. F., "Management Challenges for the 21st Century" (1999), HarperCollins
- Fiedler, A. M., "The Effect of Vision Congruence on Employee Empowerment, Commitment, Satisfaction, and Performance", 박사, pp.1993
- Fuller, J., "The Effects of Psychological Empowerment on Transformational Leadership", The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), pp.389~391 (1999)
- Hechanova, M., "Psychological Empowerment, Job Satisfaction, and Performance among Filipino Service Workers", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), pp.92~78 (2006)
- Houghton, J. D., "Toward a Contingency Model of Leadership and Psychological Empowerment: When should Self-Leadership be Encouraged?", Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12 (2005)
- House, R. J., "The Change Nature of Work : Leadership in the Twenty-First Century" (1995), The Joessey-Bass Management Series
- Howell, J. M., "Champions of Technological Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), pp.317~341 (1990)
- Janssen, O., "Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behavior", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), pp.287~302 (2000)
- Judge, T. A., "Another look at the Job Satisfaction-life Satisfaction Relationship", Journal of Applied Psydtolagy, 78(3), pp.939~948 (1993)
- Kahn, S., "The Key to Beinga Leader Company: Empowerment", Journal of Quality and Participation, 32(3), pp.1548~1566 (1997)
- Kanter, R. M., "The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation" (1983), Simon and Schuster
- Kimberly, J. R., "Organizational Innovation: the Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations", Academic Management Journal, 24(4), pp.689~713 (1981)
- Laschinger, H. K., "Staff nurse Work Empowerment and Perceived Control over Nursing Practice. Conditions for Work Effectiveness", Journal of Nursing Administration, 26(1), pp.27~35 (1996)
- Locke, E. A., "The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. in: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" (1976), Rand McNally
- Lovelace, R. F., "Stimulating Creativity Through Managerial Intervention", R&D Management, 16(1), pp.161~174 (1986)
- Makri, M., "Exploring the Effects of Creative CEO Leadership on Innovation in High-Technology Firms", The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), pp.75~88 (2010)
- Manz, C. C., "The New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves" (2001), Berrett-Koehler
- Newstrom, J., "Organisational Behaviour:Human.Behaviour at Work 9th Ed" (1998), McGraw Hill
- Oldham, G. R., "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work", Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), pp.607~634 (1996)
- Pelz, D. C., "Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development" (1966), Wiley
- Rice, R. W., "Facet Importance and Job Satisfaction", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), pp.1~39 (1991)
- Scarpello, V., "Job Satisfaction and the Fit between Individual needs and Organizational Rewards", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56(4), pp.315~328 (1983)
- Scott, S. G., "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace", Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.580~607 (1994)
- Spreitzer, G. M., "Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace; Dimensions, Measurement and Validation", Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), pp.1438~1465 (1995)
- Steers, R., "Motivation and Work Behavior" (1983), McGraw-Hill
- Thomas, K. W., "Cognitive Elements of Empowerment; An Interpretive Model of Intrinsic Task motivation", Academy of Management Review, 15(4), pp.666~681 (1990)
- Vecchio, R. P., "Leadership and Gender Advantage", The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), pp.643~671 (2002)
- Worsfold, P., "Leadership and Managerial Effectiveness in the Hospitality Industry", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 8(2), pp.145~155 (1989)
