본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상사의 이직의도가 부하의 이직의도에 미치는 영향: 이직의도, LMX, POS의 상호작용 효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Supervisor's Turnover Intention on Subordinate's Turnover Intention: Interaction Effect between Turnover Intention, LMX and POS

0

조회

0

다운로드

30

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구에서는 상사의 이직의도가 부하의 이직의도에 미치는 영향과 상사의 이직의도와 부하의 이직의도 사이의 관계에 미치는 상사-부하관계(LMX)와 조직지원인식(POS)의 상호작용효과를 조사하였다. 자료 수집을 위하여 상사의 이직의도를 측정하기 위한 상사용 설문지와 부하의 이직의도 및 관련 변수를 측정하기 위한 부하용 설문지를 구성하였으며 상사 1명 당 부하 1명을 쌍으로 연결하여 설문을 진행했다. 일반 영리기업에 다니는직원을 대상으로 설문을 진행한 결과 총 107쌍의 설문이 자료 분석의 대상이 되었다. 먼저 상사의 이직의도가부하의 이직의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미침을 확인하였다. 또한, 상사-부하관계(LMX)의 질이 높을수록 상사의 이직의도가 부하의 이직의도에 더 강한 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 나아가 상사-부하관계의 질에 의해 조절되는 상사와 부하의 이직의도 관계가 조직지원인식에 의하여 또한 조절됨을 확인하였다. 구체적으로, 조직지원인식을 낮은 수준으로 지각하고, 상사-부하관계의 질이 높을 때 상사의 이직의도가 부하의 이직의도에 미치는영향이 가장 강한 것으로 확인되었다. 연구결과 및 시사점과 함께 향후 연구 과제를 논의하였다.

Abstract

Employee turnover increases costs of selection and training, and causes adverse effects on organizational effectiveness. Researchers have examined antecedents and processes of employee turnover and have attempted to find factors that prevent employees from leaving their organizations. The present study investigated how supervisors’ turnover intention would influence subordinates' turnover intention and how Leader-Member Exchange Perceived Organization Support would moderate the relationship between supervisor and employee turnover intention. The data for the study were collected through a paper-based survey toward 300 pairs of employees in private companies located in South Korea (each supervisor was paired with a subordinate). In total, 107 paired survey respnoses were collected and used for data analyses. The results were provided such that there was a positive relationship between supervisor turnover intention and employee turnover intention. This suggested the positive moderating effects of LMX on the supervisor-employee turnover intention relationship, while there was no significant moderating effects of POS. This positive relationship was found to be stronger when LMX was higher. Finally, when the three-way interactive effects of supervisor turnover intention, LMX, and POS on employee turnover intention was examined, it was found that the supervisor-employee turnover intention relationship was strongest when LMX was higher and POS was lower. This study contributes to the current literature by shedding light on how supervisors’ turnover intention coupling with employees’ social exchange relationships on the job would jointly influence their own turnover intention, based on theoretical foundations of social exchange and social information theory. As practical contributions, first, given the effects of supervisor turnover intention on employee turnover intention, companies which desire to reduce employee turnover intention might need to reduce supervisor turnover intention. Our results also provide an interesting solution to prevent supervisor turnover intention from affecting employee turnover intention. When POS was high, supervisor turnover intention was found to be not a significant determinant of employee turnover intention. This suggests that, even when supervisors intended to quit their job, companies may keep employee turnover intention to be low as long as having those employees develop a good relationship with their organizations. This study explains process how supervisor's intention(or attitude) affects subordinate's intention(or attitude), based on SIP(Social Information Processing Theory), and examines two-way interaction between Supervisor's turnover intention and LMX(Leader-Member Exchange), further, three-way interaction between supervisor's turnover intention, LMX and POS(Perceived Organization Support).

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 곽원준, "Supervisory Voice Appraisal: Why Different Appraisal for the Same Behavior?", 조직과 인사관리연구, 37(2), pp.217~244 (2013), 한국인사관리학회
  2. 권기욱, "고성과자와 저성과자의 이직의도: 전반적 조직공정성 지각의 역할", 기업경영연구, 22(2), pp.109~129 (2015), 한국기업경영학회
  3. 박경규, "신인사관리" (2002), 홍문사
  4. 윤석범, "LMX와 조직시민행동의 관계에서 내재적 동기부여의 매개역할", 기업경영연구, 24(1), pp.1~17 (2017), 한국기업경영학회
  5. 임서영, "팀장의 리더십이 구성원의 경력몰입과 이직의도에 미치는 영향 -감성지능의 조절효과-", 기업경영연구, 17(3), pp.1~22 (2010), 한국기업경영학회
  6. 전무경, "조직지원과 조직성과간의 관계에서 LMX와 관시(Guanxi)의 조절효과에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 23(5), pp.2483~2499 (2010), 대한경영학회
  7. Abbasi, S. M., "Turnover : The real bottom line", Public Personnel Management, 29(3), pp.333~342 (2000)
  8. Allen, D. G., "The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process", Journal of Management, 29(1), pp.99~118 (2003)
  9. Baron, R. M., "The moderator– mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)
  10. Blau, P. M., "Exchange and power in social life" (1964), Transaction Publishers
  11. correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, "Applied multiple regression", pp.2003, Cohen, J.
  12. Cotton, J. L., "Employee turnover : A meta-analysis and review with implications for research", Academy of Management Review, 11(1), pp.55~70 (1986)
  13. Dansereau, F., "Multiplexed supervision and leadership : An application of within and between analysis", Leadership : Beyond Establishment Views, 81, pp.103~ (1982)
  14. Dawson, J. F., "Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression : development and application of a slope difference test", Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), pp.917~926 (2006)
  15. Dienesch, R. M., "Leader-member exchange model of leadership : A critique and further development", Academy of Management Review, 11(3), pp.618~634 (1986)
  16. Eisenberger, R., "Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation", Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), pp.51~59 (1990)
  17. Eisenberger, R., "Perceived organizational support", Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, pp.500~507 (1986)
  18. Gouldner, A. W., "The norm of reciprocity : A preliminary statement", American Sociological Review, 25(2), pp.161~178 (1960)
  19. Graen, G. B., "Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing", Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, pp.175~208 (1987)
  20. Graen, G. B., "Relationship-based approach to leadership : Development of leader-member exchange(LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years : Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective", The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), pp.219~247 (1995)
  21. Krackhardt, D., "Informal networks", Harvard Business Review, 71(4), pp.104~111 (1993)
  22. Lee, T. W., "Voluntarily leaving an organization : An empirical investigation of Steers and Mowday's model of turnover", Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), pp.721~743 (1987)
  23. Levinson, H., "Reciprocation : The relationship between man and organization", Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4), pp.370~390 (1965)
  24. Masterson, S. S., "Integrating justice and social exchange : The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships", Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.738~748 (2000)
  25. Miller, K. I., "Social information and employee anxiety about organizational change", Human Communication Research, 11(3), pp.365~386 (1985)
  26. Mobley, W. H., "Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover", Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), pp.237~240 (1977)
  27. Mobley, W. H., "Employee turnover, cause, consequences, and control" (1982), Addison-Wesley
  28. O'Reilly III, C. A., "The commitment and job tenure of new employees : Some evidence of postdecisional justification", Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), pp.597~616 (1981)
  29. Robbins, S. P., "Organizational behavior" (2012), Prentice Hall
  30. Salancik, G. R., "A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design", Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), pp.224~253 (1978)
  31. Schnake, M. E., "The social information processing model of task design conflicting cues and individual differences", Group and Organization Management, 12(2), pp.221~240 (1987)
  32. Settoon, R. P., "Social exchange in organizations : Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity", Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), pp.219~227 (1996)
  33. Tett, R. P., "Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover : path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings", Personnel Psychology, 46(2), pp.259~293 (1993)
  34. Uhl-Bien, M., "Implications of leader-member exchange(LMX)for strategic human resource management systems : Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage", Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, pp.137~186 (2000)
  35. Van Dyne, L., "Organizational citizenship behavior : Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation", Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), pp.765~802 (1994)
  36. Wayne, S. J, "The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior", Human Relations, 46(12), pp.1431~1440 (1993)
  37. Wayne, S. J., "Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange : A social exchange perspective", Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), pp.82~111 (1997)
  38. Wayne, S. J., "The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leadermember exchange", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), pp.590~598 (2002)
  39. White, S. E., "Job enrichment versus social cues: A comparison and competitive test", Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(1), pp.1~9 (1979)
  40. Zalesny, M. D., "A Field Study of Social Information Processing Mean Differences and Variance Differences", Human Communication Research, 13(2), pp.268~290 (1986)
  41. Zalesny, M. D., "Extending the social information processing perspective : New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(2), pp.205~246 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)