본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

크리스티앙 메츠의 거대 통합체에 대한 비판적 고찰

A Critical Study on the Grand Syntagmatique of Christian Metz

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

This article deals with the film semiotics of the French film theorist Christian Metz. At first, it introduces the film theories before Metz, which saw the cinema just as like a language. They are the explanations of the following theorists: Riccioto Canudo, Louis Delluc, Béla Balász and the Russian formalists, Tynianov and Eikhenbaum etc.. And then it has been explained, under which background Metz sees the cinema as the language. Metz tried to search for what corresponds to Saussure’s ‘langue’. For him, it is the purpose of the film semiotics to find the langue as the signification system in the cinema. According to Metz, however, the film does not constitute the same system as the language system, because the film lacks in 'arbitrary sign', 'minimal unit' and 'double articulation'. Nevertheless, the film gets in the end the systemic feature, for it is the systemic language in that it has the matter of expression, and in the metaphoric sense. For Metz, The Grand Syntagmatique is a systemic language in the cinema. Therefore, this article explains especially its eight types. But the given studies in Korea tends to explain only the background of the Metzian film semiotics and its some terms superficially. For that reason, this article introduced the eight types in detail, so as to overcome the limits of those studies and to make use of the eight syntagmas in the practice of the film analysis.

Abstract

This article deals with the film semiotics of the French film theorist Christian Metz. At first, it introduces the film theories before Metz, which saw the cinema just as like a language. They are the explanations of the following theorists: Riccioto Canudo, Louis Delluc, Béla Balász and the Russian formalists, Tynianov and Eikhenbaum etc.. And then it has been explained, under which background Metz sees the cinema as the language. Metz tried to search for what corresponds to Saussure’s ‘langue’. For him, it is the purpose of the film semiotics to find the langue as the signification system in the cinema. According to Metz, however, the film does not constitute the same system as the language system, because the film lacks in 'arbitrary sign', 'minimal unit' and 'double articulation'. Nevertheless, the film gets in the end the systemic feature, for it is the systemic language in that it has the matter of expression, and in the metaphoric sense. For Metz, The Grand Syntagmatique is a systemic language in the cinema. Therefore, this article explains especially its eight types. But the given studies in Korea tends to explain only the background of the Metzian film semiotics and its some terms superficially. For that reason, this article introduced the eight types in detail, so as to overcome the limits of those studies and to make use of the eight syntagmas in the practice of the film analysis.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김 숙, "크리스티앙 메츠의 영화 기호학 연구 - 영화의 의미화 작용 구조를 중심으로", 석사, 미학과, pp.1998
  2. 김시무, "구조주의적 영화 기호학 연구", 한국영화학회 영화연구, (22) (2003)
  3. 발라즈, 벨라, "영화의 이론" (2003), 동문선
  4. 조창연, "영화 인지기호학" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
  5. 정병국, "영화 기호학의 전개과정에 관한 연구", 석사, 영화학과, pp.1997
  6. 헤이워드, 수잔, "영화 사전" (1997)
  7. Metz, Christian, "Film Language" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  8. Metz, Christian, "Sprache und Film", pp.1973, Frankfurt
  9. Stam, Robert, "New Vocabularies in Film Semiotics" (1994)
  10. 게티노, 옥타비오, "불타는 시간의 연대기 (The Hour of the Furnaces)", ~ (1968)
  11. 고다르, 장뤽, "기혼녀 (A Married Woman)", ~ (1964)
  12. 그리피스, D. W, "밀가루 독점 (A Corner in Wheat)", ~ (1909)
  13. 김기덕, "비몽", ~ (2008)
  14. 말, 루이, "앙드레와의 만찬 (My Dinner with André)", ~ (1981)
  15. 브룩스 (James L. Brooks), "Mary Tyler Moore Show", ~ (1970)
  16. 에이젠슈타인, S. M, "시월 (October)", ~ (1928)
  17. 웰즈, 오손, "시민 케인 (Citizen Kane)", ~ (1941)
  18. 히르쉬비겔, 올리버 (Oliver Hirschbiegel, "엑스페리멘트 (Das Experiment)", ~ (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)