본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

하종오 시의 ‘트랜스담론’과 ‘민족공동권’ 소고

Essay on ‘Trans discourse’ and ‘Joint ethnicity’ of Ha, Jong‐oh’s poem

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

Ha, Jong‐oh’s poem is beyond the simple diaspora literature since it shows that the situation of in‐depth origins of the Republic of Korea is not much different than the surface through the vague voices of immigrant workers because even ethnic narrative related to the origin in ‘Trans space’ is questioned. In other words, it was shown that immigrant workers drawn by him are not the subjects welcomed in Korea as multi‐cultural guests, but rather that self‐evident ethnic origin is just the ‘flowing surface’ by separating the character of the state from the nation state, Republic of Korea. That is, their ‘external character’ rescales the Republic of Korea. The results of the study are as follows:First, he reveals through the gaze of immigrant workers who show 'curiosity' about Korea that Korea is not a place only for Korean anymore but also a place which can be ‘used’ by occupiers. Second, this question was implemented as a cross‐question about Korea's National Ethics while comparing the lives of immigrant workers with the lives of animals. That was a question about globalism concerning manifold forms of violence, in other words, it was a question about the laws of Korea. Third, the poet knew that the national history of Korea was a place in conjunction with the 'transnational history' of immigrants as a random narrative. If the first one was nothing but the nation’s rhetoric, the two were not opposing but related in parallel. That means that existing Korea was softened by setting Korea as a new space: through looking not at 'citizens / non‐citizens', but as 'occupiers', he tries to set both histories as one joint ethic. Ha, Jong‐oh’s poem is a ‘Trance Nation literature’ by trying to show that Korea’s ‘being Korea’ is not a matter of noble ethnicity, but consists of a ‘nation effect’. This new ‘sovereign place’, which has been used only by Koreans, is now used by ‘occupants’. This leads to global publicity which is the possibility of sovereign occupation of the immigrant workers and new publicity and universality.

Abstract

Ha, Jong‐oh’s poem is beyond the simple diaspora literature since it shows that the situation of in‐depth origins of the Republic of Korea is not much different than the surface through the vague voices of immigrant workers because even ethnic narrative related to the origin in ‘Trans space’ is questioned. In other words, it was shown that immigrant workers drawn by him are not the subjects welcomed in Korea as multi‐cultural guests, but rather that self‐evident ethnic origin is just the ‘flowing surface’ by separating the character of the state from the nation state, Republic of Korea. That is, their ‘external character’ rescales the Republic of Korea. The results of the study are as follows:First, he reveals through the gaze of immigrant workers who show 'curiosity' about Korea that Korea is not a place only for Korean anymore but also a place which can be ‘used’ by occupiers. Second, this question was implemented as a cross‐question about Korea's National Ethics while comparing the lives of immigrant workers with the lives of animals. That was a question about globalism concerning manifold forms of violence, in other words, it was a question about the laws of Korea. Third, the poet knew that the national history of Korea was a place in conjunction with the 'transnational history' of immigrants as a random narrative. If the first one was nothing but the nation’s rhetoric, the two were not opposing but related in parallel. That means that existing Korea was softened by setting Korea as a new space: through looking not at 'citizens / non‐citizens', but as 'occupiers', he tries to set both histories as one joint ethic. Ha, Jong‐oh’s poem is a ‘Trance Nation literature’ by trying to show that Korea’s ‘being Korea’ is not a matter of noble ethnicity, but consists of a ‘nation effect’. This new ‘sovereign place’, which has been used only by Koreans, is now used by ‘occupants’. This leads to global publicity which is the possibility of sovereign occupation of the immigrant workers and new publicity and universality.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 니시카와나가오, "국민을 그만두는 방법" (2010), 역사비평사
  2. 맹정현, "리비돌로지" (2009), 문학과지성사
  3. 권택영, "욕망이론" (1996), 문예출판사
  4. B․앤더슨, "상상의 공동체" (2003), 나남출판
  5. J․랑시에르, "감성의 분할" (2008), 도서출판b
  6. G․스피박, "누가 민족국가를 노래하는가" (2010), 산책자
  7. S․지젝, "폭력이란 무엇인가", pp.275~ (2012), 난장이
  8. 이성민, "부정적인 것과 함께 머물기" (2007), b
  9. 김서영, "시차적 관점" (2009), 마티
  10. 남윤봉, "이웃과의 법률관계" (2010), 동방문화사
  11. 구자광, ""도래할 민주주의": 지젝 vs. 데리다", 라깡과 현대정신분석, 10(2), pp.7~26 (2008), 한국라깡과현대정신분석학회
  12. 김성곤, "디아스포라를 넘어서:트랜스내셔널리즘 시대의 문학", 병주하동국제문학제 학술대회, (10), pp.95~ (2012)
  13. 김신정, "다문화 공간의 형성과 ‘이주’의 형상화 ― 한국 시에 나타난 다문화의 양상", 국어교육연구, (26), pp.113~143 (2010), 국어교육연구소
  14. 김홍진, "이주외국인 하위주체와 타자성에 대한 성찰 - 하종오의 시를 중심으로 -", 한국문예비평연구, (26), pp.161~184 (2008), 한국현대문예비평학회
  15. 류찬열, "다문화시대와 현대시의 새로운 가능성—하종오의 시를 중심으로", 국제어문, (44), pp.281~301 (2008), 국제어문학회
  16. 류찬열, "하종오 시에 나타난 다문화 연구-시집 '입국자들'과 '제국'을 중심으로-", 다문화콘텐츠연구, (11), pp.265~286 (2011), 문화콘텐츠기술연구원
  17. 박선주, "트랜스내셔널 문학의 소속과 지평", 한국현대문학회 학술발표회자료집, pp.26~30 (2010)
  18. 박준상, "행위로서의 외존(外存) -레비나스에 대한 하나의 반성-", 철학과 현상학 연구, (27), pp.53~70 (2005), 한국현상학회
  19. 박혜정, "민족적인 것의 경계를 넘어서 - 트랜스내셔널 히스토리를 통한 민족사 패러다임의 극복 가능성 -", 독일연구 - 역사·사회·문화, (20), pp.177~208 (2010), 한국독일사학회
  20. 서경식, "한국문학’과 ‘세계문학’을 둘러싼 단상-‘새로운 보편성’을 찾아서", 실천문학, (100), pp.278~260 (2010)
  21. 송정란, "트랜스내셔널 문학으로서의 최명희의 <몌별> 분석", 한국언어문화, (48), pp.135~157 (2012), 한국언어문화학회[DOI]
  22. 신형기, "일국문학ㆍ문화의 탈", 경계 -포스트내셔널리즘적 관점의 성과와 전망-, 2011, pp.(45), 7~33[DOI]
  23. 오윤호, "탈경계 주체들과 문화혼종 전략 - 디아스포라 소설을 중심으로", 비교문학, (55), pp.81~108 (2011), 한국비교문학회
  24. 윤수종, "안토니오 네그리와 마이클 하트의 『제국』- 제국주의에서 제국으로", 문학과 사회, 14(2), pp.722~ (2001)
  25. 이길연, "다문화시대 코리아드림의 다중성과 디아스포라 :하종오 시집 『입국자들』을 중심으로", 평화학연구, 12(4), pp.287~302 (2011), 사단법인 한국평화연구학회
  26. 좌담회자료, "이동성과 로컬리티", 로컬리티인문학, 10, pp.26~29 (2011), 부산대학교한국민족문화연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)