채만식과 루쉰 지식인 소설의 풍자성 비교 연구 - 단편 소설을 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Use of Satire in the Intellectual Novels of Chae Man-shik and Lu Xun: Concentrating on Short Novels
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chae Man-shik and Lu Xun were both widely renowned satirists in Korea and China during the mid-modern and early contemporary periods, when both Korea and China were transitioning from premodern kingdoms to modern states, largely due to the influx of Western ideas. Both writers employed satire as a metaphorical weapon, underlining the absurdity of the societies created in both countries due to continued Japanese interference and also the utter foolishness and fatuousness of the peoples of these societies. They furthermore lamented the fact that they, despite being members of the elite, were powerless to alter the absurdity of the reality they so poignantly described. The process that led to the formation of their views regarding satire can largely be ascribed to their upbringing in their native countries and also the Western ideas they were exposed to. This paper investigates and explains the unique features of their views of satire in their literary works, mainly by analyzing their personalities and their societal backgrounds. A sample of eight novels were selected for detailed analysis, namely Chae Man Shik’s A Ready-Made Life, Tomorrow, My Innocent Uncle, and A Little Madness, and LuXun’s A Happy Family, In the Drinking House, The Misanthrope, and Sadness. By examining the manner in which satire is expressed in the aforementioned novels, certain conclusions regarding the similarities and differences between novels written by the elite, as represented by Chae Man-sik and Lu Xun, can be made. In analyzing the contents of the aforementioned novels, the types of satire analyzed were divided into two categories, namely the satire of the elite and the satire of society and the others. Similarly, in analyzing the techniques used in satires, two categories were employed, namely use of irony and tone. Through this analytical process, certain conclusions were made regarding the satire of Chae Man-shik and Lu Xun, and also the consciousness with which they faced reality.
Abstract
Chae Man-shik and Lu Xun were both widely renowned satirists in Korea and China during the mid-modern and early contemporary periods, when both Korea and China were transitioning from premodern kingdoms to modern states, largely due to the influx of Western ideas. Both writers employed satire as a metaphorical weapon, underlining the absurdity of the societies created in both countries due to continued Japanese interference and also the utter foolishness and fatuousness of the peoples of these societies. They furthermore lamented the fact that they, despite being members of the elite, were powerless to alter the absurdity of the reality they so poignantly described. The process that led to the formation of their views regarding satire can largely be ascribed to their upbringing in their native countries and also the Western ideas they were exposed to. This paper investigates and explains the unique features of their views of satire in their literary works, mainly by analyzing their personalities and their societal backgrounds. A sample of eight novels were selected for detailed analysis, namely Chae Man Shik’s A Ready-Made Life, Tomorrow, My Innocent Uncle, and A Little Madness, and LuXun’s A Happy Family, In the Drinking House, The Misanthrope, and Sadness. By examining the manner in which satire is expressed in the aforementioned novels, certain conclusions regarding the similarities and differences between novels written by the elite, as represented by Chae Man-sik and Lu Xun, can be made. In analyzing the contents of the aforementioned novels, the types of satire analyzed were divided into two categories, namely the satire of the elite and the satire of society and the others. Similarly, in analyzing the techniques used in satires, two categories were employed, namely use of irony and tone. Through this analytical process, certain conclusions were made regarding the satire of Chae Man-shik and Lu Xun, and also the consciousness with which they faced reality.
참고문헌 (25)
- 채만식, "한국현대대표소설선3" (1996), 창작과 비평사
- 채만식, "(白菱)채만식 중· 단편 대표 소설 선집" (2000), 다빈치
- 채만식, "自作案內", 靑色紙, 5 (1939)
- 채만식, "文學을 나처럼 해서는 : 나의 文學十年記" (1940), 문장사
- 루쉰전집번역위원회, "루쉰 전집: 제2권 외침·방황" (2010), 그린비
- 魯迅 著, "魯迅全集:第六卷" (1981), 人民文學出版社
- 魯迅, "魯迅全集 : 第十一卷" (1981), 人民文學出版社
- 魯迅, "노신문집Ⅴ" (1987), 일월서각
- 권영민, "한국 현대 문학사1" (2002), 권영민
- 김상선, "채만식 연구" (1989), 약업신문사
- 김용성, "한국 현대 문학사 탐방" (1984), 현암사
- 김활 편저, "최재서 평론집" (1982), 김활
- 신진호, "중국 현대 문학사" (2008), 학고방
- 이래수, "채만식 소설연구" (1986), 二友出版社
- 정홍섭, "채만식 연구" (2010), 태학사
- 정홍섭, "채만식 문학과 풍자의 정신" (2004), 역락
- "與魯迅相遇" (2007), 生活·讀書·新知 三聯書店
- 王士靑, "루쉰전 : 루쉰의 삶과 사상" (1992), 다섯수레
- Arthur Pollard, "풍자" (1978), 서울대학교 출판부
- M.H. Abrams, "문학용어사전" (1985), 대방출판사
- 김홍기, "채만식의 숨겨진 필명과 작품고", 先淸語文, 18(1) (1989), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 임명진, "채만식 소설의 판소리 수용에 관한 연구", 한국언어문학, 37 (1996)
- 張明明, "루쉰과 채만식 지식인상 비교연구", 석사, 현대문학, pp.2011
- 정홍섭, "채만식 문학의 풍자적 특질", 한국문학이론과 비평, 6(1), pp.31~57 (2002), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 周清葉, "關於魯迅筆名的研究", 井岡山學院學報, 30(5) (2009)
