본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

From Intellectuals to Opportunists: Redefining the Satirical Archetype of the "Chameleon" in the Works of Ch'ae Mansik

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Perhaps one of the most remarkable characteristics of the work of Ch’ae Mansik is his capacity for satire within a deeply traumatic historical context. Although he is known as a satirist, academic studies have approached his categorization from different perspectives. Given the significance of satire in identifying Ch'ae's legacy, this article aims to provide a classification of his works in which satire plays a crucial role. In addition, through literary analysis, it proposes a theory concerning the archetypal character often found in his satirical novels. The article focuses on works that depict the "chameleon"–an opportunist archetype willing to do anything and disregard ethical considerations in order to attain material wealth and social acceptance. Furthermore, it explores the contrasting ways in which this archetype differs from the satirical portrayals of intellectuals found in some of his works from the 1930s. In so doing, this study seeks to elucidate how a focus on the chameleon archetype can contribute to a better understanding of literary legacy of Ch’ae Mansik.

Abstract

Perhaps one of the most remarkable characteristics of the work of Ch’ae Mansik is his capacity for satire within a deeply traumatic historical context. Although he is known as a satirist, academic studies have approached his categorization from different perspectives. Given the significance of satire in identifying Ch'ae's legacy, this article aims to provide a classification of his works in which satire plays a crucial role. In addition, through literary analysis, it proposes a theory concerning the archetypal character often found in his satirical novels. The article focuses on works that depict the "chameleon"–an opportunist archetype willing to do anything and disregard ethical considerations in order to attain material wealth and social acceptance. Furthermore, it explores the contrasting ways in which this archetype differs from the satirical portrayals of intellectuals found in some of his works from the 1930s. In so doing, this study seeks to elucidate how a focus on the chameleon archetype can contribute to a better understanding of literary legacy of Ch’ae Mansik.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Baldick, Chris, "The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms" (2001), Oxford University Press
  2. Booth, Wayne C, "A Rhetoric of Irony" (1974), University of Chicago Press
  3. 채만식, "A Ready-Made Life: Early Masters of Modern Korean Fiction", pp.55~80 (1998), University of Hawai‘i Press
  4. 채만식, "아름다운 새벽", 每日新報, ~ (1942)
  5. 채만식, (1996), Tosŏ Ch’ulp’an Pogosa
  6. 채만식, (1948), Minjung Sogwan
  7. 채만식, "蔡萬植全集 Vol. 10", pp.20~27 (1989), Ch’angjak kwa Pip’yŏngsa
  8. 채만식, "蔡萬植全集 Vol. 5", pp.169~290 (1989), Ch’angjak kwa Pip’yŏngsa
  9. 채만식, "민족의 罪人", 白民, 4(5), pp.33~46 (1948)
  10. 채만식, "My Innocent Uncle" (2003), Chimmundang
  11. 채만식, "Translated by Chun Kyung-ja" (1993), M. E. Sharpe
  12. 채만식, "세길로", 朝鮮文壇, 3, pp.10~16 (1924)
  13. 채만식, "蔡萬植全集 Vol. 6", pp.273~402, Ch’angjak kwa Pip’yŏngsa
  14. 채만식, ". Vol. 1" (2014), Aep’ŭl P’uksŭ
  15. 채만식, ". Vol. 3" (2014), Aep’ŭl P’uksŭ
  16. 채만식, "도야지", 文章, 3(5) (1948)
  17. 채만식, "女子의 一生", 朝光, ~ (1943)
  18. 조지향, "채만식의 해방 직후 소설에 나타난 풍자성 연구", MA, pp.2005
  19. 조동일, ". Vol. 5" (1988), Chisik Sanŏpsa
  20. 정홍섭, (2004), Yŏngnak
  21. "PhD", Sŏul Taehakkyo, 2003
  22. 최기우, "채만식 소설 “흥부전” 발견", 전북일보, ~ (2004)
  23. 최택균, "해방 공간 채만식의 풍자소설 연구 - 주체의 분열에 따른 풍자성의 약화를 중심으로", 어문학 교육, 21, pp.511~542 (1999)
  24. 최유찬, "아름다운 새벽의 알레고리 연구", 한국학연구, 39, pp.49~80 (2011)
  25. Dentіth, Ѕіmon, "Bakhtinian Thought : An Introductory Reader" (1995), Routledge
  26. Fulton, Bruce, "Sunset: A Ch’ae Mansik Reader" (2017), Columbia University Press
  27. 한미애, "채만식의 풍자소설에 나타난 아이러니 번역 양상: “치숙”과 “태평천하”의 영역본을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 16(5), pp.183~111 (2015)
  28. Hughes, Theodore, "Literature and Film in Coldwar South Korea. Freedom’s Frontier" (2012), Columbia University Press
  29. Hutcheon, Linda, "Irony’s Edge : The Theory and Politics of Irony" (1994), Routledge
  30. "개벽", 1921, 136~148
  31. Kim, Su Yun, "Claiming Colonial Masculinity: Sex and Romance with Japanese Women in Ch’ae Mansik’s Colonial Fiction", Acta Koreana, 21(1), pp.255~282 (2018)
  32. 공종구, "일제 강점기 민족문학작가와의 대화: 염상섭, 채만식, 김사량" (2022), Yŏngnak
  33. 권영민, ". Vol. 1" (2002), Minŭmsa
  34. Lee, Peter H., "A History of Korean Literature" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  35. Mostow, Joshua S, "The Columbia Companion to Modern East Asia Literature" (2003), Columbia University Press
  36. Muecke, D. C, "Irony and the Ironic" (1982), Methuen and Co
  37. "MA", Kŏn’guk Taehakkyo, 2003
  38. 노상래, "근대를 우회하는 ‘창백한 얼굴’들: 채만식의 「창백한 얼굴들」을 중심으로", 인문연구, 80, pp.137~172 (2017)
  39. 오현, (2000), Sіna Ch’ulp’ansa
  40. 박수빈, "해방기 채만식 문학의 자기풍자와 시대감각 연구", 현대소설연구, 75, pp.157~189 (2019)
  41. 방민호, "과도기: 채만식 처녀작 (친필원고)" (2006), Yeok
  42. Park, Chul, "The Reception of Don Quixote in Korea", Review of Japanese Culture and Society, 18, pp.46~56 (2006)
  43. Pavlovskis-Petit, Zoja, "A Companion to Satire, edited by Rueben Quintero", pp.510~524 (2007), Blackwell Publishing
  44. "친일작가 채만식, 그를 미워할 수 없는 까닭" (2014)[URL]
  45. 송하춘, "작가의 육성과 소설의 실제: 카프와 채만식의 문학적 거리", 현대소설연구, 24, pp.7~24 (2004)
  46. 송하춘, "채만식: 역사적 성찰과 현실풍자" (1994), Kŏn’guk Taehakkyo Ch’ulp’anbu
  47. Stevenson, Joel, "Short Fiction of the Liberation Period : Ch’ae Mansik and Constable Maeng", Acta Koreana, 2(1), pp.125~144 (1999)
  48. Textor, Cindi, "Radical Language, Radical Identity: Korean Writers in Japanese Spaces and the Burden to ‘Represent", PhD, pp.2016
  49. "채만식 ‘아름다운 새벽’은 친일소설" (2006)[URL]
  50. 이병렬, "잘난 사람들: 채만식의 풍자소설", pp.345~368 (1996), Pogosa
  51. 이상경, "일제 말기의 여성동원과 軍國의 어머니", 페미니즘 연구, 2, pp.203~241 (2002)
  52. "PhD", Hanyang Taehakkyo, 2021

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)