본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정상인에서 성격 요인이 사회적 의사결정에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Personality Factors on Social Decision-Making in Healthy Subjects

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정신과학

초록

Objectives:This study investigated the role of personality trait in the Ultimatum game and the Trolley game. Methods:Eighty subjects were recruited. The participants conducted the Big Five Inventory-K-10(BFI-K-10), the Ultimatum game and the Trolley game. The Ultimatum game consisted of two sets of questions : 48 questions with the role of a responder ; 6 with that of a proposer. The trolley game consisted of 8 scenarios, and the subjects were asked to answer whether the scenario was morally acceptable or not. Results:Openness scores were significantly associated to acceptance rate of 9 : 1 offer(r=0.269, p<0.05) and 8:2 offer(r=0.225, p<0.05) in the Ultimatum game. Agreeableness scores were associated to acceptance rate of 7 : 3 offer(r=-0.235, p<0.05) in the Ultimatum game. As a proposer in the Ultimatum game, neuroticism scores were associated to money distribution(r=-0.24, p<0.05). In the Trolley game, Openness scores were associated to acceptance rate of loop(r=-0.254, p<0.05) and loop obstacle(r=-0.254, p<0.05). Other personality traits including Extraversion and Conscientiousness showed no significant results. Conclusion:Participants with high openness scores tended to accept unfair offers in the Ultimatum game and choose decisions based on the deontological ethics in the Trolley game more than participants with other traits. Participants with high agreeableness scores showed higher rejection rates of 7 to 3 offers in the Ultimatum game. Participants with high neuroticism scores offered more money in the Ultimatum game.

Abstract

Objectives:This study investigated the role of personality trait in the Ultimatum game and the Trolley game. Methods:Eighty subjects were recruited. The participants conducted the Big Five Inventory-K-10(BFI-K-10), the Ultimatum game and the Trolley game. The Ultimatum game consisted of two sets of questions : 48 questions with the role of a responder ; 6 with that of a proposer. The trolley game consisted of 8 scenarios, and the subjects were asked to answer whether the scenario was morally acceptable or not. Results:Openness scores were significantly associated to acceptance rate of 9 : 1 offer(r=0.269, p<0.05) and 8:2 offer(r=0.225, p<0.05) in the Ultimatum game. Agreeableness scores were associated to acceptance rate of 7 : 3 offer(r=-0.235, p<0.05) in the Ultimatum game. As a proposer in the Ultimatum game, neuroticism scores were associated to money distribution(r=-0.24, p<0.05). In the Trolley game, Openness scores were associated to acceptance rate of loop(r=-0.254, p<0.05) and loop obstacle(r=-0.254, p<0.05). Other personality traits including Extraversion and Conscientiousness showed no significant results. Conclusion:Participants with high openness scores tended to accept unfair offers in the Ultimatum game and choose decisions based on the deontological ethics in the Trolley game more than participants with other traits. Participants with high agreeableness scores showed higher rejection rates of 7 to 3 offers in the Ultimatum game. Participants with high neuroticism scores offered more money in the Ultimatum game.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Güth W, "An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining", J Econ Behav Organ, 3, pp.367~388 (1982)
  2. Bergstrom T, "Experiments with economic principles: microeconomics", pp.1999, McGraw-Hill
  3. Dickinson DL, "A bargaining experiment to motivate discussion on fairness", J Econ Educ, 33, pp.136~151 (2002)
  4. Marwell G, "Economists free ride, does anyone else?: experiments on the provision of public goods, IV", J Public Econ, 15, pp.295~310 (1981)
  5. 임재환, "최후통첩게임의 학습전략과 대응전략에 대한 연구", 사회과학연구, 40(1), pp.139~154 (2014), 사회과학연구원
  6. 추지윤, "최후통첩게임 및 독재자게임을 통한 조현병 환자들의 사회적 의사결정에 관한 연구", 생물치료정신의학, 20(2), pp.109~118 (2014), 대한생물치료정신의학회
  7. Osumi T, "The positive side of psychopathy:emotional detachment in psychopathy and rational decision-making in the ultimatum game", Pers Individ Dif, 49, pp.451~456 (2010)
  8. Bartels DM, "The mismeasure of morals:antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas", Cognition, 121, pp.154~161 (2011)
  9. Csukly G, "Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study", Psychiatry Res, 187, pp.11~17 (2011)
  10. Foot P, "The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect", ~ (1967)
  11. Thomson JJ, "Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem", Monist, 59, pp.204~217 (1976)
  12. Thomson JJ, "Turning the trolley", Philos Public Aff, 36, pp.359~374 (2008)
  13. Thomson JJ, "Double effect, triple effect and the trolley problem: squaring the circle in looping cases", Yale Law J, 94, pp.1395~1415 (1985)
  14. Hauser M, "A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications", Mind Lang, 22, pp.1~21 (2007)
  15. Kornreich C, "Polysubstance dependent patients display a more utilitarian profile in moral decisionmaking than alcohol-dependent patients, depressive patients and controls", Drug Alcohol Depend, 132, pp.434~440 (2013)
  16. Carmona-Perera M, "Moral decision-making in polysubstance dependent individuals", Drug Al-cohol Depend, 126, pp.389~392 (2012)
  17. Carmona‐Perera M, "Impaired decoding of fear and disgust predicts utilitarian moral judgment in alcohol-dependent individuals", Alcohol: Clin Exp Res, 38, pp.179~185 (2014)
  18. Gleichgerrcht E, "Selective impairment of cognitive empathy for moral judgment in adults with high functioning autism", Soc Affect Neurosci, 8, pp.780~788 (2013)
  19. Kim SH, "Manic patients exhibit more utilitarian moral judgments in comparison with euthymic bipolar and healthy persons", Compr Psychiatry, 58, pp.37~44 (2015)
  20. Zhao K, "Prosocial personality traits differentially predict egalitarianism, generosity, and reciprocity in economic games", Front Psychol, pp.7~ (2016)
  21. Williams KM, "Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation", J Exp Psychol App, 16, pp.293~ (2010)
  22. Haruno M, "Activity in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala underlies individual differences in prosocial and individualistic economic choices", J Cogn Neurosci, 26, pp.1861~1870 (2014)
  23. Destoop M, "Better to give than to take? Interactive social decision-making in severe major depressive disorder", J Affect Disord, 137, pp.98~105 (2012)
  24. Kagel J, "Personality and cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma games", Econ Lett, 124, pp.274~277 (2014)
  25. Park JY, "Korean Facial Expressions of Emotion(KOFEE)", ~ (2011)
  26. Kahneman D, "Fairness and the assumptions of economics", J Bus, 59, pp.285~300 (1986)
  27. Costa PT, "Revised NEO personality inventory(NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory(NEO FFI): professional manual", Psychological Assessment Resources, ~ (1992)
  28. 김선영, "노인에서 한국판 성격 5요인 척도의 표준화 및 타당도", 생물정신의학, 17(1), pp.15~25 (2010), 대한생물정신의학회
  29. Fehr E, "The nature of human altruism", Nature, 425, pp.785~791 (2003)
  30. Chuah S-H, "Do cultures clash? Evidence from cross-national ultimatum game experiments", J Econ Behav Organ, 64, pp.35~48 (2007)
  31. Pillutla MM, "Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers", Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 68, pp.208~224 (1996)
  32. Wang J-L, "The relationships among the big five personality factors, self-esteem, narcissism, and sensation-seeking to Chinese University students’ uses of social networking sites(SNSs)", Comput Human Behav, 28, pp.2313~2319 (2012)
  33. Keyes CL, "Optimizing well-being:the empirical encounter of two traditions", J Pers Soc Psychol, 82, pp.1007~ (2002)
  34. Kupferberg A, "Social functioning in major depressive disorder", Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 69, pp.313~332 (2016)
  35. Ormel J, "Neuroticism and common mental disorders:meaning and utility of a complex relationship", Clin Psychol Rev, 33, pp.686~697 (2013)
  36. Ehnvall A, "Rejection sensitivity and pain in bipolar versus unipolar depression", Bipolar Disord, 16, pp.190~198 (2014)
  37. Lau JY, "Neural responses to peer rejection in anxious adolescents: contributions from the amygdala-hippocampal complex", Int J Behav Dev, 36, pp.36~44 (2011)
  38. Greene JD, "Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment", Cognition, 111, pp.364~371 (2009)
  39. Greene JD, "An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment", Science, 293, pp.2105~2108 (2001)
  40. Greene JD, "The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment", Neuron, 44, pp.389~400 (2004)
  41. Ciaramelli E, "Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex", Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2, pp.84~92 (2007)
  42. Koenigs M, "Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements", Nature, 446, pp.908~911 (2007)
  43. Mendez MF, "An investigation of moral judgement in frontotemporal dementia", Cogn Behav Neurol, 18, pp.193~197 (2005)
  44. Bartels DM, "Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making", Cognition, 108, pp.381~417 (2008)
  45. Greene JD, "Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment", Cognition, 107, pp.1144~1154 (2008)
  46. Valdesolo P, "Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment", Psychol Sci, 17, pp.476~477 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)