최후통첩게임 및 독재자게임을 통한 메스암페타민 사용자들의 사회적 의사결정에 관한 연구
Social Decision Making in Methamphetamine Users Using Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study aimed to compare social decision-making between healthy controls and methamphetamine users using ultimatum game (UG) and dictator game (DG). In addition, the purpose of this study was to identify the effect of personality factors on social decision-making. Methods: The study included 39 methamphetamine users from a drug abuse center and a probation office, as well as 46 individuals in the control group. The UG and DG were conducted, where participants played the roles of proposers and responders. Also The Korean version of the Personality Factor Scale was used to assess personality factors among methamphetamine users. Results: The results showed that methamphetamine users had significantly lower acceptance rates compared to the control group in all proposed ratios in the UG. Additionally, the proposed amount of money (South Korean Won, KRW) in the DG were higher for methamphetamine users when the proposer had a happy facial expression and lower when the proposer had an angry facial expression. In addition, methamphtetamine users, who are more neurotic, had lower acceptance rates, but offeres more money when acting as the proposer. Conclusions: The findings suggest that methamphetamine users exhibit lower acceptance rates in social decision-making tasks, indicating a conflict between self-interest and rejecting unfair offers. The study highlights the importance of considering social decision-making in the treatment and rehabilitation of methamphetamine users to address social maladjustment factors.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare social decision-making between healthy controls and methamphetamine users using ultimatum game (UG) and dictator game (DG). In addition, the purpose of this study was to identify the effect of personality factors on social decision-making. Methods: The study included 39 methamphetamine users from a drug abuse center and a probation office, as well as 46 individuals in the control group. The UG and DG were conducted, where participants played the roles of proposers and responders. Also The Korean version of the Personality Factor Scale was used to assess personality factors among methamphetamine users. Results: The results showed that methamphetamine users had significantly lower acceptance rates compared to the control group in all proposed ratios in the UG. Additionally, the proposed amount of money (South Korean Won, KRW) in the DG were higher for methamphetamine users when the proposer had a happy facial expression and lower when the proposer had an angry facial expression. In addition, methamphtetamine users, who are more neurotic, had lower acceptance rates, but offeres more money when acting as the proposer. Conclusions: The findings suggest that methamphetamine users exhibit lower acceptance rates in social decision-making tasks, indicating a conflict between self-interest and rejecting unfair offers. The study highlights the importance of considering social decision-making in the treatment and rehabilitation of methamphetamine users to address social maladjustment factors.
참고문헌 (41)
- Arunogiri S, "Emotion recognition and impulsive choice in relation to methamphetamine use and psychosis symptoms", Front Psychiatry, 10, pp.889~ (2019)
- Franklin TR, "Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients", Biol Psychiatry, 51, pp.134~142 (2002)
- Tanabe J, "Medial orbitofrontal cortex gray matter is reduced in abstinent substance-dependent individuals", Biol Psychiatry, 65, pp.160~164 (2009)
- Kim YT, "Alterations in cortical activity of male methamphetamine abusers performing an empathy task : fMRI study", Hum Psychopharmacol, 25, pp.63~70 (2010)
- Kim SY, "A study on personality disorder of methamphetamine abuse or dependent patients in Korea", J Korean Soc Biol Ther Psychiatry, 9, pp.204~212 (2003)
- Homer BD, "Methamphetamine abuse and impairment of social functioning : a review of the underlying neurophysiological causes and behavioral implications", Psychol Bull, 134, pp.301~310 (2008)
- Uekermann J, "Social cognition in alcoholism : a link to prefrontal cortex dysfunction?", Addiction, 103, pp.726~735 (2008)
- Anglin MD, "History of the methamphetamine problem", J Psychoactive Drugs, 32, pp.137~141 (2000)
- Kahneman D, "Choices, values, and frames", Am Psychol, 39, pp.341~350 (1984)
- Schwartz H, "Herbert Simon and behavioral economics", J Soc Econ, 31, pp.181~189 (2002)
- Eckel CC, "Altruism in anonymous dictator games", Games Econ Behav, 16, pp.181~191 (1996)
- Park SJ, "The effects of decision-making situation in ultimatum game", Korean Manag Sci Rev, 25, pp.1~12 (2008)
- Jeon YE, "The effect of social anxiety on social decisionmaking in the ultimatum game: focusing on the mediating effect of paranoid thought", pp.2022
- Güth W, "An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining", J Econ Behav Organ, 3, pp.367~388 (1982)
- Fehr E, "The nature of human altruism", Nature, 425, pp.785~791 (2003)
- Chuah SH, "Do cultures clash? Evidence from cross-national ultimatum game experiments", J Econ Behav Organ, 64, pp.35~48 (2007)
- Kahneman D, "Fairness and the assumptions of economics", J Bus, 59, pp.S285~S300 (1986)
- Costa PT, "Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): professional manual", Psychological Assessment Resources, ~ (1992)
- Kim SY, "Standardization and validation of big five inventory-Korean version (BFI-K) in elders", Korean J Biol Psychiatry, 17, pp.15~25 (2010)
- Pillutla MM, "Unfairness, anger, and spite : emotional rejections of ultimatum offers", Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 68, pp.208~224 (1996)
- Chapman HA, "In bad taste : evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust", Science, 323, pp.1222~1226 (2009)
- Sanfey AG, "The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game", Science, 300, pp.1755~1758 (2003)
- Damasio AR, "Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions", Nat Neurosci, 3, pp.1049~1056 (2000)
- Phillips ML, "A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust", Nature, 389, pp.495~498 (1997)
- Miller EK, "An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function", Annu Rev Neurosci, 24, pp.167~202 (2001)
- Wagner AD, "Prefrontal contributions to executive control : fMRI evidence for functional distinctions within lateral prefrontal cortex", Neuroimage, 14, pp.1337~1347 (2001)
- Zhai T, "Functional connectivity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicts cocaine relapse : implications for neuromodulation treatment", Brain Commun, 3, pp.fcab120~ (2021)
- Yu X, "Others' facial expressions influence individuals making choices and processing feedback : the event-related potential and behavioral evidence", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 20, pp.568~ (2022)
- Aguilar de Arcos F, "Experience of emotions in substance abusers exposed to images containing neutral, positive, and negative affective stimuli", Drug Alcohol Depend, 78, pp.159~167 (2005)
- Bechara A, "Decision-making and addiction(part II) : myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward?", Neuropsychologia, 40, pp.1690~1705 (2002)
- Iidaka T, "The role of the superior temporal sulcus in face recognition and perception", Brain Nerve, 64, pp.737~742 (2012)
- O’Dell SJ, "Repeated administration of methamphetamine damages cells in the somatosensory cortex : overlap with cytochrome oxidase-rich barrels", Synapse, 37, pp.32~37 (2000)
- Kim YT, "Impairments of facial emotion recognition and theory of mind in methamphetamine abusers", Psychiatry Res, 186, pp.80~84 (2011)
- Urry HL, "Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predict the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults", J Neurosci, 26, pp.4415~4425 (2006)
- Payer DE, "Neural correlates of affect processing and aggression in methamphetamine dependence", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 68, pp.271~282 (2011)
- Loewenstein G, "Handbook of affective sciences", pp.619~642 (2003), Oxford University Press
- Schwartz B, "Self-determination. The tyranny of freedom", Am Psychol, 55, pp.79~88 (2000)
- Destoop M, "Better to give than to take? Interactive social decisionmaking in severe major depressive disorder", J Affect Disord, 137, pp.98~105 (2012)
- Brocklebank S, "Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games", Pers Individ Differ, 51, pp.881~886 (2011)
- Landegren H, "Self-image concerns and dictator game giving:an experimental analysis", pp.2017
- Bailey PE, "Age-related differences in social economic decision making : the ultimatum game", J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 68, pp.356~363 (2013)
