본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

탈주하는 성, 한국 현대소설 -1910~20년대 소설의 동성애적 모티프에 나타난 탈식민주의적 연구

Sex on the Run and Modern Korean Novels - A post-colonial study on the homosexual motifs of novels in the 1910s and 1920s -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study set out to investigate the ways the subject perceived modern times and his or her post-colonial perceptions through homosexuality embodied in novels from the 1910s and 1920s. Post-colonial reading is a process of taking away our subjecthood from the standpoint of the subject as we became colonial others inside. The separated sexual subject is not actually separated but takes separation itself as the essence of the subject, trying to exist as the sexual subject of separation, who establishes him or herself as the subject in the patterns of separated sex and thus perceives others, making resistance against the distorted modern times in the form of subversion and appropriation. In the 1910s and 1920s, homosexuality remained in the area of purity until it gradually fell into the grips of power and became the other by increasingly supervision, punishment, and suppression. The discourse about homosexuality those days saw it as something negative that should be watched out and defined it as a primitive act based on the rational logic of medicine and science. In that process, basic human desire innate in sex as a violation or homosexuality erupted, threatening the modern order and causing disruption for rebellion. The homosexuality embodied in works pursued health and purity rather than pathological symptoms. The writers disclosed abominable and corrupted aspects of human through heterosexuality and pulled chaste love out of homosexuality. As the colonial situations turned worse, purity for homosexuality became greater. Such patterns of homosexuality were the allegorical devices for the writers to reflect the times. They were expressed in camaraderie, friendship, and sibling love, which presented the colonial situations in the way of subversion in their suppressed forms and criticized the colonial reality through the forms of love on the run. Is It Love? and Yun Gwang-Ho display desire for and resistance against Japanese imperialism through the mixed subjecthoods through homosexuality. Tears of Sympathy, You with a Shallow Mind, and To My Young Friend reveal the hypocrisy of the substance of love as homosexuality is hidden with a metaphorical device of friendship and heterosexuality is cut and practiced by an institutional device. They show the points where the modern order breaks down and the expression of pure physical love between the same sex individuals. No Love presents homosexuality in the form of sisterly love and instills hidden fellowship, demonstrating the diversity of desire that resists by bursting out suppression. Homosexuality's power of subversion lies in that the problematic consciousness of modern enlightenment is reproduced through women that are the lower-level subjects. The perceptions of post-modernity are closely related to the subject perceptions of our modernity. Thus they are the resutis of a theoretical effort to overcome colonial modernity and, at the same time, claim validity as the methodological device to see the real aspects of our modern times right.

Abstract

This study set out to investigate the ways the subject perceived modern times and his or her post-colonial perceptions through homosexuality embodied in novels from the 1910s and 1920s. Post-colonial reading is a process of taking away our subjecthood from the standpoint of the subject as we became colonial others inside. The separated sexual subject is not actually separated but takes separation itself as the essence of the subject, trying to exist as the sexual subject of separation, who establishes him or herself as the subject in the patterns of separated sex and thus perceives others, making resistance against the distorted modern times in the form of subversion and appropriation. In the 1910s and 1920s, homosexuality remained in the area of purity until it gradually fell into the grips of power and became the other by increasingly supervision, punishment, and suppression. The discourse about homosexuality those days saw it as something negative that should be watched out and defined it as a primitive act based on the rational logic of medicine and science. In that process, basic human desire innate in sex as a violation or homosexuality erupted, threatening the modern order and causing disruption for rebellion. The homosexuality embodied in works pursued health and purity rather than pathological symptoms. The writers disclosed abominable and corrupted aspects of human through heterosexuality and pulled chaste love out of homosexuality. As the colonial situations turned worse, purity for homosexuality became greater. Such patterns of homosexuality were the allegorical devices for the writers to reflect the times. They were expressed in camaraderie, friendship, and sibling love, which presented the colonial situations in the way of subversion in their suppressed forms and criticized the colonial reality through the forms of love on the run. Is It Love? and Yun Gwang-Ho display desire for and resistance against Japanese imperialism through the mixed subjecthoods through homosexuality. Tears of Sympathy, You with a Shallow Mind, and To My Young Friend reveal the hypocrisy of the substance of love as homosexuality is hidden with a metaphorical device of friendship and heterosexuality is cut and practiced by an institutional device. They show the points where the modern order breaks down and the expression of pure physical love between the same sex individuals. No Love presents homosexuality in the form of sisterly love and instills hidden fellowship, demonstrating the diversity of desire that resists by bursting out suppression. Homosexuality's power of subversion lies in that the problematic consciousness of modern enlightenment is reproduced through women that are the lower-level subjects. The perceptions of post-modernity are closely related to the subject perceptions of our modernity. Thus they are the resutis of a theoretical effort to overcome colonial modernity and, at the same time, claim validity as the methodological device to see the real aspects of our modern times right.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. 이광수, "사랑인가" (1981), 문학사상
  2. 이광수, "어린 벗에게", 청춘, (9) (1917)
  3. 이광수, "윤광호", 청춘, (13) (1918)
  4. 이광수, "H군에게", 창조, (7) (1920)
  5. 이광수, "무정" (1983), 중앙서관
  6. 이광수, "H군을 생각하고", 조선 문단, (2) (1924)
  7. 김동인, "마음이 옅은 자여", 창조, (3) (1919)
  8. 백악, "동정의 루", 학지광, (19) (1921)
  9. 羽太銳治, "一般性慾學" (1921), 實業之日本社
  10. 羽太銳治, "近代 性慾學" (1922)
  11. "동성애, 여자교육상에 있어서 새로운 의의", 부인공론, 7(8) (1922)
  12. 소춘, "요때의 조선신여자", 신여성 (1923)
  13. "작부 2명이 정사-동성연애가 염세증이 되어 월미도 앞에 허리 매고 빠져, 시대일보, 1924,5,6", ~ (1924)
  14. "성교육으로 본 동성애의 폐해, 아무리 동성애라도 생리적으로 방임하면, 동아일보, 1924,11,3.", ~ (1924)
  15. "여학생과 동성연애문제", 신여성, 2 (1924)
  16. 차상찬, "전라남도 답사기", 개벽 (1925)
  17. "남녀동성애자살, 일본 吳市前吉浦町에서, 동아일보, 1926,1,22", ~ (1926)
  18. 정석태, "성욕의 생리와 심리:남녀 양성의 성욕고", 별건곤, (19) (1929)
  19. "인간계에서 모르고 있는 여학교 기숙사의 비밀", 별건곤, (15) (1928)
  20. "성욕의 생리와 심리", 별건곤, (19) (1929)
  21. "성교육으로 본 동성애의 폐해, 중외일보, 1929.11.3", ~ (1929)
  22. "동성애로 여인가출,봄바람을 딸아(평양), 동아일보, 1929.4.10", ~ (1929)
  23. "동성애로 정사, 동아일보, 1929.6.11", ~ (1929)
  24. "여류명사의 동성연애기", 별건곤, (34) (1930)
  25. "동성애도 끊이어 음독자살한 죄수, 동아일보, 1930.3.29", ~ (1930)
  26. "청춘 두 여성의 철도자살사건과 그 비판", 신여성, 5(4) (1931)
  27. "그 여자들은 왜 철도자살을 하엿나", 별건곤, (40) (1931)
  28. "최근에 빈번한 동성애와 자살, 한떨기 장미화는 철로 위에, 중앙일보, 1931.12.30", ~ (1931)
  29. "박사와 논문집", 별건곤, (36) (1931)
  30. "사원지상망년회", 별건곤, (46) (1931)
  31. "동성애와 자살, 중앙일보, 1931,12,30", ~ (1931)
  32. 이석훈, "동성애 만담1, 동아일보, 1932.3.17", ~ (1932)
  33. 윤치왕, "결혼과 임신 좌담회", 조광 (1932), 1932,11월.
  34. "극도의 동성애로 살인까지, 조선중앙일보, 1933,11,24", ~ (1933)
  35. "부여의 살인사건은 동성연애의 갈등, 조선중앙일보, 1933, 12,9", ~ (1933)
  36. "두 송이 낙화! 강수에 스러진 혼백-동성애에 희생된 두 처녀, 동아일보, 1937,9,7", ~ (1937)
  37. "외설죄에 중벌, 동아일보, 1938, 12,27", ~ (1938)
  38. "여학교 기숙사감 일기", 삼천리, 11(7) (1939)
  39. "윤치왕 외홍옥임과 심정택의 자살 사건, 동아일보, 1929,6,11. 조선일보, 1931,5,5. 조선일보 1938,5,11. 별건곤・신여성・삼천리 5월호", ~
  40. 김윤식, "이광수와 그의 시대 1" (1999), 솔
  41. 고길섶, "탈식민주의 담론과 세계지도 다시 그리기", 문화과학, (17)
  42. 권성우, "1920~30년대 문학비평에 나타난 ‘타자성’ 연구", 박사, pp.1994
  43. 김성곤, "탈식민주의 시대의 문학", 외국문학 (1992)
  44. 나병철, "한국문학의 근대성과 탈근대성" (1996), 문예출판사
  45. 미셸 푸코, "비정상인들" (2001), 동문선
  46. 미셸 푸코, "감시와 처벌" (1994), 나남
  47. 미셸 푸코, "광기의 역사" (1993), 인간사랑
  48. 민승기, "바바의 모호성", 현대시사상 (1996)
  49. 방민호, "이광수의 자전적 문학에 나타난 작가의식 연구", 어문학논총 (2003), 국민대학교 어문학연구소
  50. 빌 애쉬크로프트, "포스트 콜로니얼 문학이론" (1996), 민음사
  51. 바트 무어 길버트, "탈식민주의! 저항에서 유희로" (2001), 한길사
  52. 신지연, "1920~30년대 ‘동성(연)애’ 관련 기사의 수사적 맥락", 민족문화연구, (45), pp.265~292 (2006), 민족문화연구원
  53. 엠마뉴엘 레이노, "강요된 침묵-억압과 폭력의 남성 지배문화" (2001), 책갈피
  54. 이성희, "이광수 초기 단편에 나타난 ‘동성애’ 고찰", 관악어문연구 (2005), 서울대 국어국문학과
  55. 이승렬, "분신의 정치학-스피박의 탈식민주의 이론에 대한 비판적 읽기", 현대시사상 (1990)
  56. G. C, Spivak, "하위주체가 말할 수 있는가?", 세계사상, (4) (1987)
  57. G,실비안, "이광수 초기 문학에서 드러나는 동성애 모티프에 관한 계보학적 연구", 박사, pp.2007
  58. 제프리 윅스, "섹슈얼리티: 성의 정치" (1997), 현실문화연구
  59. 죠르쥬 깡길렘, "정상적인 것과 병리적인 것" (1996), 인간사랑
  60. Friedrich Nietzsche, "권력에의 의지" (1988), 청하
  61. 한승옥, "동성애적 관점에서 본 <무정>", 현대소설연구, 20, pp.7~30 (2003), 한국현대소설학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)