본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

오장환 초기시에 나타난 이중성의 폭로와 욕망의 문제

Disclosure of Duplicity and Desire in Oh Jang-hwan's Early Poems

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper aims to examine early poems of Oh Jang-hwan from the perspective of disclosure of duplicity and desire from his first published poem 'Mokyokgan' (Public Bath) to first poem book Seongbyok(Castle Walls). The characteristics of Oh's early poems have been defined as criticizing or denying problematic tradition, however, without specifically designating the object of criticism or denial. This paper will specify the object as the duplicity of premodern and modern society and that various layers of desire are at the bottom of that duplicity. Here, the duplicity indicates the deceptive behaviors of Yangban, ruling class of premodern society who cover the desire of individual and group up with Confucian ideology and the strategy of segregation and separation of forced modernization hidden behind the glamourous exterior. Modern and premodern society are identical in that they are deceptive and hypocritical. Oh Jang-hwan's early poems criticize the universal desire of modern and premodern society by disclosing the duplicity. In 'Camera Room' and 'Mokyokgan', Oh describes the survival of premodern ideology which had already lost its value, class distinction, racial discrimination and the matter of desire in modern and premodern society. In 'Seongbyok'(Castle Walls), 'Jeongmoon'(Gate of Filial Piety) and 'Seongssibo'(Genealogical Record), he discloses deceptive behaviors of premodern ruling class, including himself. In 'Oncheonji'(Hot spring) and 'Suboo'(Capital), he reveals the strategy of class distinction and separation of modern society by contrasting the brightness and darkness of modern city. In this way, Oh Jang-hwan expresses his awareness of crisis in modern society. By including himself in the criticism on modern and premodern society, his crisis awareness shows tragic features and his criticism can be justified. This tragic features of Oh Hang-hwan's early poems is one aspect of aesthetic modernity closely related to the reality of Korea in mid 1930s.

Abstract

This paper aims to examine early poems of Oh Jang-hwan from the perspective of disclosure of duplicity and desire from his first published poem 'Mokyokgan' (Public Bath) to first poem book Seongbyok(Castle Walls). The characteristics of Oh's early poems have been defined as criticizing or denying problematic tradition, however, without specifically designating the object of criticism or denial. This paper will specify the object as the duplicity of premodern and modern society and that various layers of desire are at the bottom of that duplicity. Here, the duplicity indicates the deceptive behaviors of Yangban, ruling class of premodern society who cover the desire of individual and group up with Confucian ideology and the strategy of segregation and separation of forced modernization hidden behind the glamourous exterior. Modern and premodern society are identical in that they are deceptive and hypocritical. Oh Jang-hwan's early poems criticize the universal desire of modern and premodern society by disclosing the duplicity. In 'Camera Room' and 'Mokyokgan', Oh describes the survival of premodern ideology which had already lost its value, class distinction, racial discrimination and the matter of desire in modern and premodern society. In 'Seongbyok'(Castle Walls), 'Jeongmoon'(Gate of Filial Piety) and 'Seongssibo'(Genealogical Record), he discloses deceptive behaviors of premodern ruling class, including himself. In 'Oncheonji'(Hot spring) and 'Suboo'(Capital), he reveals the strategy of class distinction and separation of modern society by contrasting the brightness and darkness of modern city. In this way, Oh Jang-hwan expresses his awareness of crisis in modern society. By including himself in the criticism on modern and premodern society, his crisis awareness shows tragic features and his criticism can be justified. This tragic features of Oh Hang-hwan's early poems is one aspect of aesthetic modernity closely related to the reality of Korea in mid 1930s.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김학동, "오장환 전집" (2003), 국학자료원
  2. 최두석, "오장환 전집 1" (1989), 창작과비평사
  3. 최두석, "오장환 전집 2" (1989), 창작과비평사
  4. 김백영, "지배와 공간-식민지도시 경성과 제국 일본" (2009), 문학과지성사
  5. 김학동, "오장환 평전" (2004), 새문사
  6. 백철, "신문학사조사" (1980), 신구문화사
  7. 서준섭, "한국 모더니즘 문학 연구" (1988), 일지사
  8. 정한숙, "현대한국문학사" (1982), 고려대학교출판부
  9. 마샬 버만, "현대성의 경험" (2004), 현대미학사
  10. M. 칼리니스쿠, "모더니티의 다섯 얼굴 (2판)" (1994), 시각과 언어
  11. 김기림, "『성벽』을 읽고-오장환씨의 시집, 조선일보, 1937. 9. 18", ~ (1937)
  12. 김승희, "정신분석적 기호학으로 본 서정주와 오장환의 시세계", 한국문학이론과 비평, 8 (2000), 한국문학이론과 비평학회
  13. 김용희, "식민지 지식인의 근대 풍경에 대한 내면의식과 시적 양식의 모색 - 1930년대 오장환의 경우 -", 한국문학논총, (43), pp.229~258 (2006), 한국문학회
  14. 김학동, "오장환 시의 시적 변이와 지속성의 원리", 시문학, 4(7) (1990)
  15. 김현정, "오장환 시에 나타난 탈식민성 연구", 어문연구, 49, pp.285~306 (2005), 어문연구학회
  16. 박민규, "오장환 시의 댄디즘에 나타난 근대 비판의 성격", Comparative Korean Studies, 15권(1호), pp.225~253 (2007), 국제비교한국학회
  17. 박윤우, "오장환 시 연구", 석사, pp.1989
  18. 심재휘, "오장환 시 연구", 석사, pp.1989
  19. 오세영, "탕자의 고향발견. in: 월북문인연구" (1989), 문학사상사
  20. 이명찬, "오장환 시의 時·空間的 특징", 한중인문학연구, (8), pp.260~298 (2003), 한중인문학회
  21. 이봉구, "『성벽』시절의 장환. in: 성벽" (1946), 아문각
  22. 이현승, "오장환 시의 부정의식 연구* - 초기시를 중심으로", 한국시학연구, (25), pp.227~248 (2009), 한국시학회
  23. 임화, "신춘 조선 시단 전망(3), 조선일보, 1934.1.4", ~ (1934)
  24. 장만호, "부정의 아이러니와 환멸의 낭만주의 - 오장환 초기시의 시의식", 비평문학, (32), pp.173~196 (2009), 한국비평문학회
  25. 장영수, "오장환과 이용악의 비교연구", 박사, pp.1987
  26. 조해옥, "근대인의 불안과 허무의식", 한남어문학, 22 (1997)
  27. 주영중, "오장환 시의 낭만성 연구- 『성벽』과 『헌사』를 중심으로", Comparative Korean Studies, 16(1), pp.419~448 (2008), 국제비교한국학회
  28. 최두석, "오장환의 시적 편력과 진보주의" (1989), 창작과비평사
  29. 최윤정, "기호학적으로 읽는 오장환 시의 탈식민성", 한국문학이론과 비평, 13(4), pp.121~146 (2009), 한국문학이론과비평학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)